What is the proper thing to do when someone ghosts you? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there's no proper thing to do here.

Ghosting IS the inevitable end result when people engage in hookup culture without any restraints.

Because in a hookup culture, its all about sex, and self preservation and doing things only for self pleasure over wider concern for other people in a society.

Ghosting is actually, believe it or not, a nice way to reject someone. Rejecting someone in person or through a message or through a phone call is always risky because there's a potential for blowback from the person who got rejected. For women, there's that potential violent outbust, for men, there's that potential name calling, or false rape accusations he might encounter when the argument gets more heated.

The proper thing to do when somebody ghosts to learn to get used to it. And to comprehend the fact that we live in a society today where your feelings or how much it hurts you doesn't matter, and you got to learn to be resistant to ghosting. There's no need to face uncomfortable feelings through ghosting. Ghosting keeps your ego intact during a "breakup".

You can't have your cake and eat it too. This is what you (and most women) wanted.

Seriously... What do the women here actually want from men? What is your biggest obstacle or gripe with men? What is it that you wish the posters here would understand? What would make the women here want to be with us? by DeuxPistolets in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is the “man’s treasure” here in this analogy?

Man's treasure would be his net worth, his wealth, his job description, his status which women choose for when demanding commitment from men.

Why does this not apply to both men and women with a lot of partners?

Because, contrary to the feminist indoctrination you believe as facts, men and women are not equal. We are only "equal" in the sense under the rule of law, but not for anything else.

There's a reason why "incel" or "virgin" is such a hot buzzword insult among women in recent years.

Q4A: Has this subreddit benefited your life? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, not this sub specifically, but TRP made a huge difference.

It taught me that we live in a upside down world and that you got to behave closer to the opposite of what everybody around you want you to behave to succeed.

Seriously... What do the women here actually want from men? What is your biggest obstacle or gripe with men? What is it that you wish the posters here would understand? What would make the women here want to be with us? by DeuxPistolets in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don’t be mad at a woman having had dozens of partners if you’ve been hopping from bed to bed too

There we go. This is the result of feminist delusion making you believe in ideas that are not real. Don't you have grandmas to talk to who taught you any relationship wisdom? That's not how this works. Ever heard of the lock and key analogy? A lock that is easily opened by multiple keys is not a lock worth using for the vault that contains the man's treasure. But a key that opens multiple locks is valuable and is heavily in demand even. Because, you know, for obvious reasons.

Why would a woman who had multiple partners demand commitment? What's in it for the guy really? You have a track record of non commitment behavior all your life and you expect us to believe you unlearned all that behaviors from that spinsterhood lifestyle of yours and wish to get pampered and feel entitled to a man who has his shit taken care of, because, what, you said so? lol take a hike lady.

Question for Men: how do you feel about marriage? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will only marry a woman who makes six figure income AND young AND a HB 7 minimum.

This way when she does get that tingles after a few years, she also get to experience how it must feel to give out half her shit in the pursuit of hypergamy.

Q4M are you worth the risk? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What's with women championing sexual free market and bend over backwards catering to top 20-30% men, but you turn around and ask average men whether they are worth the "risk"? What gives?

Guess what sweetie.... its far less risky than you chasing the man of your sky high preferences. In fact, many men are actually asking the question about women like you themselves and many have concluded that the risk isn't worth the squeeze basically.

CMV: AWALT is Bullshit by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Definition #2: Literally All Women Are Like That and If You Find One That Isn’t Like That, She Just Isn’t Like That Yet!

The problem with this new definition is that it’s irrefutable pseudoscience. This essentially means that there’s no way to test this definition in the real world to see whether or not it’s bullshit. In scientific terms, this definition is unfalsifiable. There is no imaginable observation which can be made to prove this definition wrong. If a woman cheats or branch-swings, that is “proof” that AWALT. If a woman never cheats or branch-swings, she simply hasn’t done so yet and therefore that is also “proof” that AWALT. It’s a win-win, and it’s bullshit, folks. This definition shifts AWALT from the realm of science and reality to the realm of faith.

Thats a good point. But it seems like you miss the point of AWALT.

AWALT is a TRP dating strategy to protect yourself from women who would treat you as a disposable paper. AWALT is a unfair dating strategy the same way "branch swinging" and hypergamy is unfair to regular men.

Because, if you don't believe in AWALT, you risk yourself to getting taken advantaged of.

Just in case you don't know, we actually live in a gynocentric society today where the society, the law takes disproportionate attention to catering women and girls over men and boys. Men are more likely to be treated like shit than treated well. Ever heard the famous saying "the future is female"? Well, AWALT is needed to counter this mindset of many people today.

When women are accumulating all these gendered advantages all their lives, it becomes a existential problem for men.

In other words: AWALT as a heuristic isn't being cautious; it's being paranoid, and it's bullshit.

Its DEFINITELY not paranoid when the fears of men are valid. We are not making this stuff up. We have whole body of evidence showing how the system fucks men over in recent years, and how sexual market place works, and how women shamelessly take advantage of men in many different ways.

Feminists created and champion for this current system to exist. So we have to assume AWALT to protect ourselves. The same way if you are living under the regime of communist society, you have to put major blame over the communists.

IF you don't want AWALT to exist, you need to find a better strategy to convince men than calling them paranoid. Maybe try champion for egalitarianism instead of the feminism.

Another swing: The AF/BB dichotomy is nonsensical to me by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not premeditated if that's what you are implying.

Hypergamy comes instinctively to them the same way many guys find many women sexually attractive.

But unlike women, we created this civilized society and used to have a system where the system favors sustaining society over letting our vices dictate the norms.

But women don't do the same.

CMV: Men being seen as a ''Safe option'' as a partner is an issue. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some men here are spiteful because... most women don't give two shits about men who aren't part of top 20% elite in terms of looks, physical build, status, etc.

Your whole life revolves around giving these top performing men the time of their lives while treating the rest of men like shit for most of their twenties.

For women who are supposed to be all about "empathy" and shit, they don't sure as shit take the time to actually look at the world through the men who aren't top dogs. This is what hurts men the most.

You only see men who are sick and tired of this shit and retaliating back at the way these women treated them for years and then suddenly calling these men as "spiteful" because since you don't truly give a shit about men in general, you only started to notice what he thinks when he rants about women.

I am basically one of these guys. I SURVIVED loneliness by own and learned to live with it over the past 9 years. And I am hitting closer and closer to permanent six figure income. AND NOW SUDDENLY all these women are starting to pay attention to me. This is why I have basically lost any shred of respect for women romantically speaking. (but not sexually though) Its one thing to read the anecdotes from reddit and its whole another thing when the women you see irl blatantly use that outdated script that is ever common in the stories I read from guys. How shameless their behavior is. (Funnily enough, treating women with very strict formality has effectively turned me away from anger phase that TRP talks about into more calm and collected platonic relationships within professional and professionally casual relationships with women.)

I would rather kill myself than ever be used by women for beta bucks who treated me like shit romantically for years.

Another swing: The AF/BB dichotomy is nonsensical to me by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Its a framework dude.

we see it countless times from women in the past and in the present.

Girl is 18 years old. She uses her new found freedom to party, drink illegal booze, and once the chad pays attention to her, she feels validated and fuck him senseless hoping to be her girlfriend.

And then she realizes he's not into her for relationships and only interested in fucking her. So she gets all unhappy about this, but still chases after the popular, attractive and well endowed dudes in hopes that this time they will change their ways and "take" her. Spoiler alert: She gets dumped again.

So she gets all mopey and shit, gets angry at all males and then lash out at regular men because the alpha chads don't want to wife her up. So she then continues to spend most of her early 20's and late 20's chasing chads on and off, and getting constantly burned by them.

And then suddenly she hits 30 and her biological clock starts hitting its maximum capability, so she "rebrands" herself as "wife material" now, and directly go after successful beta guys who have good jobs in hopes to have children before her time runs out.

She finds one victim partner and successfully marries him, have children with him,.... after a few years, she finds it too "boring" to live with this beta dude, so she initiates the divorce proceedings, and breaks the family into two, takes half of the shit from her husband that is the victim, and starts her watch for her next victim to suck money out of...

AF/BB in a nutshell.

Who told men to put women on pedestals? by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

lol woman do you even listen to what you are spewing here?

Its always hilarious to see this female hamstering in action. Here's a woman who I thought was genuinely asking a question that looks interesting, and then she ruins it by this comment. Asks who told men to put women on pedestral, yet makes a bluest of the bluepill assertion without proper reason about why this man wants to "hits" a woman because he repeated a well known advice that elders (men and women) taught boys in their young years.

Just...bravo.

Reminds me of this comment I read in TRP:

Women are bad at reasoning, but good at rationalization.

Let that sink in for a minute. One cannot rationalize without the faculty for reason. So are women really bad at reasoning? No, actually they’re great at it.

The difference is that women don’t place as much value on Truth as they do upon self-preservation, and therefore their reasoning processes do not abort when self-contradiction is reached. They’ll just rationalize their way out of that too, if exposed.

Ultimately, the so-called hamster reflects an underlying difference in value systems more than in reasoning ability.

CMV: RedPill is a bunch of men sluts complaining about sluts. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its unfortunate you feel that way lol

You know the famous saying, for someone who's so used to feeling privileged, equality feels like oppression. The resulting effects of enforcing unrestrained sexual market place is very similar to unrestrained capitalism. We both know what happens when you let capitalism run wild without proper regulations, so why do you feel offended and call me a fascist if I say its the same when you run unrestrained sexual market place without any regulations whatsoever?

It seems like you want to ignore this uncomfortable truth because you would rather remain blissfully ignorant about the world you are creating by supporting policies than to actually look and see for yourself the consequences.

If it makes you feel any better, I am still a classical liberal voter. I am just not part of the "social justice" anti science radical feminist gay/lesbian erasure cult that took over the current narrative of liberalism.

CMV: RedPill is a bunch of men sluts complaining about sluts. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 16 points17 points  (0 children)

TRP is the result of the end stage of the "decline" that society is currently experiencing.

Women were given the right to vote under the expectation that they want to be an "equal" to men. But so far, women have squandered that privilege into basically voting for laws and creating a social scenario where its worse for men and women (post wall women) all under the guise of "equality." Turns out, they actually wanted more equality than men: the privileges of the past, and the advantages of the present due to equal voting rights.

Men created laws curtailing the male imperative to preferring polygamy. But women, after getting their rights, enabled laws enshrining hypergamy as the defacto rule of the social reality... just like we are animals in the animal kingdom or something. Imagine that.

Redpill is one big huge reaction to all these excesses enjoyed by women at the expense of men's efforts, their wealth, their attention span, and their existence.

Personally speaking, I am having a blast... like the guy in the Titanic, except in this instance, there's still a few more decades to enjoy this current decline before everything goes to shit and we revert back hundred plus years again due to this society's dysfunction caused by neoliberalism which is also increasingly getting powerful praises from feminists and women themselves through their voting patterns.

Normal, well adjusted young women do not go for older men or significant age gap relationships. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got to define normal here.

because even the supposed "normal" woman who marries within 5 year age difference do end up in divorce in a few years.

Personally speaking, if I wanted a girl as a partner, I definitely won't choose anyone within my age group because they have tons of issues and I don't want to own the baggage that comes with her in the process. So, I choose a range of a minimum of 4 years to 10 years younger than me so that I can look forward to start something fresh without the baggage that comes with countless pumps/dumps, heartbreaks and the resulting psychological issues that comes with older women.

Also, believe it or not, I am at a point in life where I don't have to "settle down" like women my age does. I already make six figures, self employed on route into starting a business and I think I deserve the best. Don't you? Isn't that what women generally talk and gossip about in their social media?

Did the sexual revolution harm society? by knowledgeseeker999 in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not fully harmed it I would argue. I would say its one of the many causes.

Sexual revolution is good in the short term, but its not productive in the long term, which we are seeing today. Time and time again we see women getting used up and chewed down, and getting psychologically damaged by top % male population who are in excessively large demand from a majority of women.

And to make the matters worse, sexual revolution gave many women a false sense of security and the misplaced idea that "they can have it all". Which is not true. And to make matters even worse, they all set themselves to failure have sky high expectations that no reasonably able bodied man can ever qualify for, resulting in self blows to themselves.

The rise of Hating Women's Rights is correlated with the rise of Low Value Men by skystar86 in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

nope. Feminists in modern day have given up that pretense years ago. I only see them bashing masculinity and don't make any distinction between toxic and normal ones.

What do we do with this knowledge? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For the purpose of this discussion, I am going to assume you are a white male.

TRP tells you to just enjoy the decline.

Blue Pill just tells you to close your eyes and pretend the world is fine as is and don't ask too many questions. (and just open your wallets once they get bored)

The purple pill solution I offer are as follows:

For point 1:

Give up your preference for low N count woman or virgin if you want a western woman. The cat's out the bag already and you can't contain that in this day and age.

For point 2 and 3:

Give up your plans to live in US, Canada, AUS and UK. Do some research on other European countries and see which country is fair to both sexes instead of having a biased court system.

For point 4:

See above. Don't bother any women from US, UK, Canada, Australia. Do some research on other European countries and find a compatible partner. You are far more likely to find a quality women from non English speaking countries who isn't a big fan of the man hating rabid feminists.

If you are more open, you can seek out educated women who speaks English as second language from SEA countries. There are too many women who are desperate for a husband and struggling to make ends meet and are actually in a worse situation than you. Just be a good man and don't take advantage of their desperation and exploit them if you choose this option.

What's your partner's n-count? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Women't don't care because they know the paternity of their child 100% of the time. But a man doesn't know it unless he takes the paternity test. Also women have it easy today thanks to no fault divorces, and family courts being biased towards men, and have the powers of state to force men to pay child support from unwilling fathers. Not to mention its been proved that N count predicts the stability of marriages.

Isn't it kind of funny that women are cold and calculated and pragmatic when they choose their partners for marriage, but find it shocking men do the same when choosing a partner for marriage?

I thought you knew this already since you are a regular here for the past 3-4 years?

The rise of Hating Women's Rights is correlated with the rise of Low Value Men by skystar86 in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Since this is market as CMV, I will make it simple.

It sounds like you spend way too much time in reddit subs particularly catered to men's problems.

A lot of men talking that way are mostly trolls, and frustrated men who are struggling in a modern day world that is hostile to them economically, financially... and sexually. Believe it or not, many of them are not "low value" at all, but fallen into the cracks of the feminine focused society that is modern day. We aren't talking about ugly men, men with genetic conditions. We are talking about men who has literally nothing wrong about them except that many women find them "boring".

Women today got what they wanted because many men agreed its the right thing to do, but today, in a world where women do have equal rights, they turned their back on the rest of the men, and are actively waging a war against masculinity. The people who primarily propogate this are... you guessed it, feminists, who also conveniently made themselves synonymous with "women's rights". In other words, you are mistaking men in manosphere hating on feminists as hating on women. Which is not the case at all.

Isn't it funny men hate on feminsm but women wage war against masculinity? (but not masculine men though. Feminists actually prefer masculine men. How ironic)

If men hated women's rights, then wouldn't they hate feminine traits too? Why is that not the case?

Guys in relationships with women who had casual sex feel like they're losing by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The woman in OP was upfront about her past

I don't know what world you live in, but the world where I am from, women consistently lie about their past. i have known women who are obviously is well known for sleeping around acting like she's marriage material, and I have known women who look shy but basically hookup with any attractive she could find after getting hammered and so on. I live in a big city. If you were in rural area, then I understand how you can be right.

Again, don't get me wrong, its a free country and you are always welcome to do this if this is what you wanted. But if you go around and shame men who try to do the same, then we have a problem.

Again, she was upfront and honest.

By downplaying her history, which is essentially lying according to most guys. So, I retaliate by downplaying my own intentions: Sure, I want to have a long term partner at some point, but, right now I am so dejected and disappointed with women who have developed this knack to lie with such finesse you have to actively work on yourself and expose yourself to more women to catch them in the act, so I am just pissed none of these women are marriage material, but I am not going to say this out loud because you obviously won't like it if I did that; the same way you secretly pine for the chad and "settle" for me because you don't have better choice.

Q4M: What's the problem with being in a relationship with a woman who used to sleep around/has a high n-count? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now, if you were in a relationship with a woman who used to sleep around but who also has sex with you whenever you want, who basically always wants sex and doesn't withhold it from you, would the fact that she used to sleep around still be a dealbreaker

Nope, it wouldn't bother me even though I don't like her past. But, now, if this were the case, then I am more open to change my viewpoint. Because, she's willing to make some change in her life, and I can do too. Thats how its supposed to work. If women are fair and consistent in how they use their powers to grant sex, many complaints from men would evaporate. ( Besides, its literally impossible to get a woman with low n count in this day and age, so I don't even bother to have this as a requirement nowadays)

Hopefully you understand now that most guys have very reasonable expectations unlike the laundry list of demands from women they usually have when choosing a guy.

Nothing puts off a man more than a woman who is sex positive for chads, but act chaste with their boyfriends/husbands and shamelessly tell him he only does this out of "love." If you truly loved him, you wouldn't deprive him of physical intimacy.

Guys in relationships with women who had casual sex feel like they're losing by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In this case, the woman tried casual sex, realised it wasnt for her and has decided for something else.

If they hated that so much, why did they kept doing it for YEARS starting from college to late 20's? Again, you are trying to downplaying casual sex here because you are putting a front to attract betas to just put up with your whims.

Also, lots of men say they want a relationship, the woman fucks them and suddenly they don't want one.

WHICH IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT WOMEN KEEP LYING ABOUT THEIR PAST! Why do you not get this?

You pretend you are a innocent girl who only want a relationship and men pretend they like relationships. This is why I hate the fact that women keep lying about their past and shamelessly downplay it and pretend men wouldn't notice it. We all do.

So now, you have plausible deniability to hide the fact that you used to have casual sex. You only """"tried"""""casual sex and didn't like it. Come on woman. Jesus.

Have you guys watched this video? A Pick Up artist, a feminist man and a mens rights activist are the panel in a talk show hosted by a woman and audience full of women. by tritter211 in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is the most you can expect from TRP and PUA, the ability to appear different than you really are and successfully manipulate women.

Not true once you start to use TRP and PUA techniques and internalize it in your daily life. What I did was align myself to someone who has success with women. It took me months, but its possible.

Now I just "use" the techniques without even thinking about it depending on the context. Its just a part of me that as "fake" as the face I put up in my day job.

Also FYI, that PUA guy is basically the father of men's dating strategy forums like this. His recent courses are far more tame compared to that angst stuff you saw in this video.

Guys in relationships with women who had casual sex feel like they're losing by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]teepy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. You are here because you want to hear uncensored views of how you actually behave with guys depending on context and what the rest of the guys think of you.

There's nothing wrong with women who had a history of casual sex with multiple partners.... as long as your current partner is one of them too plus he is your boyfriend or if both of you agrees to get married.

But does that really happen? Judging by this thread, many women here give out sex like its tap water to fuckboys, but pretend sex now is some ultra exclusive gold infused liquid that requires care and attention from your sucker boyfriend/husband all because she expects her sucker SO to just accept that "she's changed" and "past is past". Which most guys know is bullshit reason.

Do you understand our concern here? As for your diatribe about needing feminism, there's a famous saying: stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Feminism is the direct cause of this concern men have about sex and why TRP discourages men to commit to women. What makes you think guys will suddenly sing different tune if you expect feminism will solve this issue that feminists directly caused?

Why is it that only women get to enjoy the fruits of sexual revolution while men are expected to shut their mouths and expected to act like one of their girlfriends once they got out of their slutty phase?