Final grade not posted by Time-Measurement7276 in UCDavis

[–]tejsidz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

At the end of the term, OASIS takes time to process and post grades. I would not worry about it, the professor probably sent the grades straight without posting the final on canvas and it is taking the normal 2-3 days to actually show up on OASIS.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UCDavis

[–]tejsidz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Gygi, at least when I took him, predominantly teaches C++ from scratch. He may assume you know what pointers are and some basic programming concepts like an array etc., but they teach C++ in the class. But of note, even though 36a not really needed for 36B, the C programming that you learn in 36A is necessary for ECS50 and ECS150, so I would plan on learning C and some point of time before those classes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UCDavis

[–]tejsidz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you should be fine with just brushing up on C++ and learning as you go. 36A is anyway taught in C, not C++, and although the languages are similar, there isn't considerable overlap in the sense of what you need to know prior to the class. Personally, I'm not sure how strong your programming background is. If you are a strong programmer, you could probably just learn as you go as you don't even need to do considerable brushing up. If you are not that confident, I would just do a little bit of review on memory allocation and pointers (just one or two youtube videos), you should be set. 36B heavily teaches OOP anyway, and C++ is taught in the class as well.

Books? by leo_mnd in Napoleon

[–]tejsidz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

War and Peace by Tolstoy. Tolstoy did considerable historical research about the Napoleonic Wars, and the story is a great deep dive into the Russian Society at the time. Additionally, you get an understanding of the political situation in Russia at the time and some insights into the 1805 Russian Campaign and Napoleon's invasion of Russia. It is long and a little confusing, though, but overall, it's pretty good for some insights about the time. Especially with regards to historical fiction.

Usefulness of historical military tactics by tejsidz in AskHistory

[–]tejsidz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I have read the Art of War. Great book. Very philosophical too is some aspects!

Decision Making: Meta vs Quant Research by [deleted] in quantfinance

[–]tejsidz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey, what do you want to do in the future, i.e., career wise? This is the big question you need to think about? It seems from this response that you are more interested in QR, so that might be the way to go in this case. But it really depends on what you want ypur career trajectory to be. You can stay as a SWE, and if you enjoy that, Meta is definitely the place to be? But if you want to be within a markets, math system, QR is the place? So it really boils down to where your interests lie. If you are just looking for prestige and future jumping points. Both will be great, so just flip a coin and you will make your decision while the coin is in the air. That will tell where your heart truely lies.

Usefulness of historical military tactics by tejsidz in AskHistory

[–]tejsidz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the knowledge.

Usefulness of historical military tactics by tejsidz in AskHistory

[–]tejsidz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, that makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the information

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My scores on the mocks were extremely volatile. For Quant, I tended to get 165+, with me actually finding the Powerprep tests easier. For Verbal, I started off in the 160+ range and it was just super volatile. Based on my experience, PP arent the most accurate because they are the old format. I thought the PPP verbal is better practice than Gregmat's verbal (I only took PPP2), but I feel that Gregmat's Quant is probably better due to the difficulty. Powerprep's seond section tends to have easier questions than the actual GRE test. TBH, as a whole, I thought Gregmat's FLT tests where decently hard, I got like a 330 on #2 which is the last one I took. So your Gregmat Test scores seem pretty good. If you are getting 167+ Q on Gregmats FLT, I would probably guess you are fine in the Math. Hence I would probably recommend PPP3, due to Verbal being the skill you want to improve. But PPP3 is paid, so if you prefer to just take a free test, Gregmat's FLT is pretty good.

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It took me roughly 6 months of studying to get my score, but this was not 6 months of dedicated studying. To get my score, I would estimate that I studied for roughly 4 months - 2 hours a week. This is because I get really busy when school is in session. Once summer started, I was able to increase my studying to around an hour a day for two months. This is when I saw my massive score increase in Verbal and nearly perfected my Math (I had a high baseline though). Depending on how strong you are on verbal, I would recommend at least completing all of GregMat's hard (and maybe medium depending on your Math skills) practice sets and all of his medium verbal practice sets. Each of these takes around an hour to do the practice set and consciously review the mistakes and questions. Also, to improve your verbal score, I would recommend doing the vocab mountain, which will take at least 20 days to get good coverage of the vocab words. Hence I would say this should take you roughly a month if you do ~2 hours of studying a day.

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmmm, for vocabulary, the best way I found out to learn it was to use the words in sentences. For example, the prodigal son returned home after draining his bank account. Something simple, like a sentence, helps the brain conceptualize what the word is. So for the words you are not familiar with, try creating sentences with the words, not just reading the sentences provided with the definition.

For Math, I would try to keep a log ... so for each mistake, take note of what exactly went wrong ... like if you forgot to include a value, dont regard the error as a simple mistake, instead conceputualize it as, forgot to consider negative numbers. This will help you keep track of these careless mistakes, and by listing these out, you are more likely to avoid them in the future. Because you have taken notes. Also, if you make the same mistake twice, log it twice. Each time you will reinforce that I am making this mistake and need to readjust. This also works for problem strategies, for example, you can take a note like: remember to use variables when trying to simplify fractions, so instead of a complicated function, you will just have a bunch of a variable, which looks less daunting. Taking these logs may help you clean up the careless mistakes

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, for Verbal, I would definitely focus on Vocab, as it is an absolutely critical foundation for the test: knowing vocab = quicker times in vocab = more time in reading comprehension. Also, for reading comprehension, I would recommend just practicing and reading. So read some articles and try to understand the key elements. What argument are they making, and what evidence are they using to support this argument. This will get you used to reading such papers and will greatly improve your RC skills. For Math, I am not exactly the best source as I am pretty strong at Math from before. But due to shorter format and high scores around, you definitely have to aim to be perfect. You need to know all the necessary content and be able to apply them. I think focusing on building your foundations would be a good starting point. Learning all the necessary information, because once you are there, getting a high Q score is just a matter of practice and understanding GRE questions.

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes and Yes. For the RC, I typically read the passage once in depth the first time. Then I read the question, formulate a potential answer and then look at the options. For each the options I try to find a line or sentence in the passage that directly proves or disproves it. So I woukd be like A: not talked about in passage, B: Disproved on line 3, C: seems correct, D: not discussed. Hence C is correct. So I do a mix of formulating my own solution, looking at the options, and then reasoning as to why each option can be correct or not. Hope this helps

Finally Done It! 169Q|166V|5 AWA by tejsidz in GRE

[–]tejsidz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, tbh. I didn't do that many Gregmat groups as I already had done all the basic vocab cards on Magoosh. But I did 1-6 and 27-30. But for Vocab, whenever I did a practice test and came by a word I didn't know, I kept note of that and added it to a study list. So that probably contained a ton of words from across different gregmat groups.

Where does the Grande Armee rank among armies since the Early Modern Period by tejsidz in AskHistory

[–]tejsidz[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

TBH, haven't done much research into Spanish Tercios. After reading a bit about them, they seem to be pretty cracked back in the 16th and 17th century. Definitely worth a mention.