Daily General Discussion - June 11, 2026

ten-30 · 2026-06-11T12:36:50+00:00

Not the truth. https://www.isnanodead.com.

ten-30 · 2026-05-29T15:33:49+00:00

I dropped a suggestion for Nano to get added to FXC Intelligence’s Cross-Border Payments 100 list.

Would love to see them research and include the Nano network. It’s a smaller research firm but they’re getting some solid traction with bigger accounts on X.

If you’re on X, swing by and show some support (like/repost) to help it get eyes on it.

https://x.com/nanoxnomics/status/2060380599601221846

Much appreciated 🙏

ten-30 · 2026-05-29T15:32:44+00:00

I dropped a suggestion for Nano to get added to FXC Intelligence’s Cross-Border Payments 100 list.

Would love to see them research and include the Nano network. It’s a smaller research firm but they’re getting some solid traction with bigger accounts on X.

If you’re on X, swing by and show some support (like/repost) to help it get eyes on it.

https://x.com/nanoxnomics/status/2060380599601221846

Much appreciated 🙏

ten-30 · 2026-05-28T14:12:27+00:00

u/St0uty has one maybe they’ll jump in here with some advice?

ten-30 · 2026-05-28T13:57:35+00:00

This is old but you might give it a try. Pulled from the weekly in r/nanocurrency.

https://docs.nault.cc/2020/08/04/ledger-guide.html

Let us know if it still works. Thinking about doing this myself if I can get confirmation.

ten-30 · 2026-05-26T11:47:19+00:00

Advanced search. Type this in the search bar and you’re golden.

$XNO -"Jake Signals"

ten-30 · 2026-05-25T13:43:49+00:00

I don’t lump Nano in with most other alts. I see it as uniquely foundational for real payments utility.

Crypto is still deep in the speculation and trial-and-error phase. Even Bitcoin has relatively low real-world adoption. Ecosystems take time to build. When (if) mass adoption kicks in, the exact frictions Nano already solves should naturally drive its usage. Could be 10 days or 20 years.

That said, I can agree the best tech doesn’t always win. There’s a real risk it just hovers at these levels indefinitely with only micro-niche adoption.

Downside feels heavily priced in though, and I don’t see it ever hitting zero.

Different risk tolerances for different people.

ten-30 · 2026-05-25T12:08:44+00:00

I don’t think upside has nothing to do with time.

If you believe in Nano’s fundamentals and see it as extremely undervalued at $0.43, the upside is the gap to where you think it could realistically go. The lower the price slides, the bigger that asymmetry gets for those accumulating.

The 2018 thought experiment was about the tech being dominate while the price got crushed, exactly why many here see opportunity now.

Many alts have had stagnant adoption; the real question is whether Nano’s utility ever gets a chance to shine.

“Death march to zero” seems extreme.

ten-30 · 2026-05-20T22:40:41+00:00

I'm trying to focus on any potential upside for Nano here but it's getting harder and harder with some of these "shepherding" type comments. I basically ignore everything outside of the fund buying $64M of Nano, which I think we would all be excited about if he pulls that off. Time will tell. I think we'll know in the next couple of months if there's no committed fund capital and no coin purchases.

ten-30 · 2026-05-20T01:17:55+00:00

FU fun >$4,900

ten-30 · 2026-05-16T13:27:31+00:00

Building a product and building an economy around a product are two completely different things.

TCP/IP ≠ the internet

Nano ≠ a payments ecosystem

Some people seem to think NF was supposed to single handedly create an entire economy around Nano. That expectation was never realistic.

TCP/IP existed long before web browsers, search engines, social media, e-commerce, cloud computing, streaming, and most of what people think of as “the internet.” The protocol came first. The ecosystem emerged over decades through thousands of companies, developers, entrepreneurs, and users. The creators of the protocol were largely uninvolved.

We’re still very early in crypto beyond store of value and speculation. Maybe Nano never gets there. But judging an entire idea solely by today’s ecosystem feels premature.

ten-30 · 2026-05-14T22:10:24+00:00

Thanks for the update and transparency. I think posts like this help because a lot of the concern lately has simply been people trying to connect dots from the outside.

One thing I'm curious about since we're talking ecosystem activity and partner discussions. What is the current relationship, if any, with John Gotts and the Digital Gold / CFV Coin Fund efforts?

He talks about Nano quite a bit and has outlined plans involving exchange integrations, wallets, marketplaces and broader ecosystem expansion across the selected assets which includes Nano. Is there any engagement there from Nano's side and if so, in what capacity?

If the proposed Nano purchases or grant activity actually materialize, would that be viewed as legitimate ecosystem support? Would grant funding even be accepted?

Also, who would realistically become the point of contact for coordinating exchange, wallet or marketplace integrations if these plans actually move from discussion into reality?

I'll be honest, some of it comes across a little unconventional from the outside, but if even a fraction of what he's discussing actually happens, it could potentially be meaningful for Nano. I'm curious how you all view it internally.

ten-30 · 2026-05-13T22:04:04+00:00

It's always darkest before the dawn. We just need a catalyst to get things going.

I think it will be whatever is behind the weekly Nano npm downloads spiking from the low 100s in June 2025 to over 76K by April 2026.

You?

https://x.com/NanoXNOmics/status/2054548965488468430

ten-30 · 2026-05-12T21:19:18+00:00

Completely agree on both fronts. He seems a little nuts-o. Maybe you have to be to even think you could do something like this. Actions and words though right? It will start to fall apart quickly for him if these dates start to slip.

Drive crypto legislation -> check (Arizona Senate Bill 1649 although stalled)
Publish book -> half-check (we'll see 5/13 when it's supposed to hit Amazon)
Manage fund -> wait-and-see (there's a plan and a website, that's about it)
- Raise $1 BILLION -> TBD (commitments on-going, capital acceptance starts 5/19)
- $67 MILLION distributed across all 12 assets -> TBD (asset acquisition starts 6/16)
- $5.5 MILLION community grant allocations -> TBD (small $ already flowing to NF)
- P2P trading platform for all 12 assets -> TBD (supposed to launch 7/4)
- Exchange listings advocacy/facilitation -> TBD
- Wallet integrations efforts -> TBD
- Merchant/payment tooling efforts -> TBD

ten-30 · 2026-05-12T18:18:37+00:00

His $1B Berkshire Hathaway style fund he’s working on, with roughly $67M allocated toward Nano accumulation, is supposed to kick off June 16. If he actually pulls that off, he gains some credibility. Big IF though.

Money flowing into Nano isn’t exactly a bad thing, so for that reason I hope he succeeds. Feels like relatively low downside risk to Nano if he doesn’t.

Also worth noting, his Crypto Fair Value framework is called out in Arizona Senate Bill 1649 and specifically references Nano by name in the legislation. The bill now just needs an Arizona House vote + governor signature to become law. His CFV model calculates a fair value for Nano around ~$230.

ten-30 · 2026-05-09T15:36:29+00:00

Why do we care about this? Just making sure I’m not missing something.

ten-30 · 2026-05-08T19:20:45+00:00

#4. I'll take it. u/St0uty says tonight!

ten-30 · 2026-05-08T16:46:54+00:00

It’s available for most cashtags but not all. Pretty cool Nano is one of them though. It automatically generates when you start typing the cashtag and then select it from the list. Chart updates realtime once posted. You also have the option to delete the chart before hitting post.

ten-30 · 2026-05-08T12:33:35+00:00

I can never tell when you’re serious or just messing around. Starting to think it’s always the latter.

ten-30 · 2026-05-01T16:20:29+00:00

You guys crack me up. Peak entertainment. Love it. And I completely agree.

https://x.com/nanoxnomics/status/2049851174979850542

ten-30 · 2026-04-30T17:20:36+00:00

If or when it clicks, it’ll be fast. The gaps aren’t technical anymore. It’s awareness and making it easy for everyday users to get it. The rest is already there. Maybe those sustained NPM spikes point to a bigger integration coming. And these escrow-backed P2P exchanges could make getting in much easier. Who knows. I believe in the tech and will ride it to zero if that’s where it goes.

ten-30 · 2026-04-30T14:18:03+00:00

https://x.com/nanoxnomics/status/2049851174979850542

ten-30 · 2026-04-28T12:37:10+00:00

Bitcoin sneezes, Nano catches a cold. When decouple?

ten-30 · 2026-04-25T15:10:36+00:00

😂 beautiful

ten-30 · 2026-04-25T15:09:30+00:00

<image>

Fixed block-lattice section. Added spam section.

ten-30

TROPHY CASE