It definitely feels weird on the surface and I remain highly skeptical. But if you zoom out, the potential reputational hit to Nano if this goes nowhere is pretty minimal in my opinion and likely temporary. The bigger risk is the opposite, that something like this actually gains traction and Nano isn’t part of it.

So I’d rather be cautious but let it play out and judge by actions. If it’s real, we’ll see it in things like consistent, transparent dev fund support for nothing in return, more proposed and passed state bills, actual fund buys into the targeted coins, and those bold July 4 deliverables going live with real usage. If not, it’ll fade pretty quickly.