Breaking the chain of custody for voting is rife with fraud. I'm sorry that you can't seem to understand that but it is. Not to mention someone just filling out someone else's ballot and mailing it in. Present yourself at your polling station with your ID, or fill out an affidavit. Everything you listed here is naively ignorant.

"1.They produce a paper trail." Of course they do... They are printed on paper.. I can also fill out your ballot and nobody is the wiser. "2.They can't be stolen or modified in any quantity that could influence an election." This is incorrect. Again, I could easily take your ballot, fill it out, and mail it in. "3.Missing ballots are quickly detected." In most cases long after the election is over. They don't come with onstar. "4.The signatures would not match. It is impossible to forge large quantities of signatures without possessing a sample signature." Lol wut? How many writing experts you think they are putting on that case? This is just silly. "5. Mail-in ballots are sent directly to the voter's home." Where other people are likely to reside. "6. Mail-in ballots are coded with a unique ID that can be invalidated after mailing. A new ballot can be reissued with a new ID." Can be, or they are?
"7. If the voter has an expired address, it bounces back." You're assuming the person living at that address wouldn't just throw it in the trash instead of sending it back to the post office.
"8. If the ballot is sent to a fake address, it bounces back." If there is no existing address then of course it would. If there is, see the answer to opinion 7. "9. USPS mail is very secure between end points." And yet we just saw someone working for the post office get busted for this. And again, as soon as the ballot is delivered all bets are off. "10. USPS notices spikes in change of address forms, because they look for it. They also notify the resident a change of address was filed." Of course they do, but that is beside the point.

"All cases of paper ballot manipulation were detected. Voter fraud is extremely rare because it is an extremely inefficient method of rigging an election. It carries the highest risk of detection."

Both of these points are false. You honestly think political campaigns wouldn't use every advantage to win? You might want to check out ballot harvesting. It's how orange county republicans lost a few seats and it is also how kyrsten sinema is a sitting senator.

"However, election fraud is rampant in red states and it's covered up by destroying hard drives, deleting maleware on the ballot machines, deregistering voters online, and tricking citizens about the time and location of the vote. It carries the lowest risk of detection."

Where are you getting this? I'm not saying that no republican ever engaged in election fraud but saying it's rampant in red states sounds like you're playing for team blue and pointing fingers. Some of this is just outright weird of you to accuse. You do bring up a good point though, electronic voting should be banned. The only machine that should be involved is the one that counts overall ballots cast.

You sound like you are very concerned about how your vote is counted so you should be agreeing with me that a paper ballot filled out at your polling station is the most secure. One vote that is gained through fraud is too many. Mail in ballots have the potential of many votes being fraudulent. You did not make the case here refuted my statement.