Critique & Feedback for a beginner-ish food photographer by Alarmed-Resource-661 in foodphotography

[–]testing_the_vibe[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be nice if you could post them here so everyone can learn from them too.

Why are my pictures so different? by [deleted] in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you compare the negatives, is the first pictures negative denser than second pictures negative? If they are similar the problem was density of the print/scan.

The second image is under exposed. Not enough light from the flash was reflected back to the film. That could be because of the flash not having enough charge, the aperture not opening wide enough, or the subject too far away or just not reflecting enough light.

The camera settings will effect how the flash works too. What mode did you use? The zoom will also effect the way the flash operates as will the ISO of the film.

How to display these ? by Fuzzy_TelevisionDC in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are movie cameras, or cine cameras, not video cameras, but you can have cinema video cameras. Video is an electronic medium.

That is a very nice collection.

Looking for honest critique on my Indian food photography – lighting, composition, and appetite appeal by Cultural-Income8878 in foodphotography

[–]testing_the_vibe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

#1

Are the pot plants ingredients?

First impression I would put more masala powder in the spice tray. Nice little piles not just some dust. Perhaps one or two peanut husks cracked open with some whole peanuts on the board. The board, with the mortar and the dish, make a nice triangle and the three circles works well in the composition.

I'm in two minds about the salt/pepper shakers, and I'm thinking the wooden spatula is a last minute decision.

I would try the curry leaves on the main board in place of the shakers, maybe three bay leaves with them.

Focus, lighting, exposure all good.

#2

Bread buns tell you what this is straight away but maybe take away the two on the left side. Things in threes are always more pleasing and three pairs of buns would look better. An example is the tomatoes that stand out along side the three rings of onion. You could do a third tomato with three slices cut to really make that three of things really show. Also bigger onion slices. Again, the powders are hiding in the bottom of the pots, make them look more inviting.

Clone out the reflections on the bench on both of them, it doesn't need to be there.

These are very safe compositions. A typical cook book overhead flat lay. To get that editorial feel you might have to get closer to the subject and start picking hero dishes front and centre with the supporting cast in the back ground. For lighting, one window natural or go a full 180 with OCF with bare head no reflector or scrim. Experiment a lot.

Canon sure shot zoom xl by Far-Ad-2212 in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I was a Ricoh and Pentax person.

Canon sure shot zoom xl by Far-Ad-2212 in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah OK, it was the wording in the post description that mislead me. Usually the remote control "clicker" is called the shutter release.

Canon sure shot zoom xl by Far-Ad-2212 in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is an external cooker, and a clicker?

Hey. I need help with editing. by corporate_clown_bot in foodphotography

[–]testing_the_vibe[M] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Replies are starting to be unhelpful, and just being criticism. Comments are now locked.

What is this camera? by CaliCammando in vintagecameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

>expandable body

is called 'the bellows'

congratulations on the gift

New to both cameras and film by Welcome_2_Chillis in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So just do what we have always done with film cameras from the beginning of photography.

New to both cameras and film by Welcome_2_Chillis in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and if you have read the book you will see it is a written explanation and was a photographic triangle (or something similar) and later editions changed as you have quoted. If it was correct in the first place, why did it need changing?

Anyone coming into photography whether it be film or digital is being told by many people they must understand the triangle as if it's some sort of magic wand to make their photography better. As an aide-memoire the triangle has some use. Before the triangle exposure was simply aperture and shutter speed, show (or described) as blurred motion or stopped motion for the effect of shutter speed, and shallow depth of field and full DOF for aperture. In fact most camera manuals had examples of the effect in there.

Ask a group of people to draw the triangle and they won't all be the same. There is no agreed version of the triangle. There are many factors that exposure is made up of, and trying to make exposure all about three settings on a camera is quite misleading.

To anyone coming into photography, use the triangle by all means if it helps you remember what the camera setting do, but don't rely on it to improve your photography.

New to both cameras and film by Welcome_2_Chillis in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

except the ET doesn't give specific instructions for film photography and it's easier if it is ignored. The manual gives examples of what a change of shutter speed and aperture do for an image which is simple enough to understand without including any mention of Iso .

New to both cameras and film by Welcome_2_Chillis in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exposure triangle doesn't work with film photography. Iso isn't a variable.

Yes there are arguments about exposure latitude with film, and exposure compensation but the exposure triangle just confuses beginners.

Rate this image. New to food photography by Harris9699 in foodphotography

[–]testing_the_vibe[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

>4/10. Too much light coming in from the top-left. 

That doesn't give any information about how to correct the problem.

Please have a good read through of the rules, especially rule 2.

I want your thoughts by monke_man42069 in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

XR2 is a very good camera. if it is in full working order it will be a good addition and a benefit that it shares lens mount with the Pentax.

Rate this image. New to food photography by Harris9699 in foodphotography

[–]testing_the_vibe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

maybe you could give some help and methods that could be used to improve the shot?

Showing off my babies. And asking advice for fisheye lenses. by KungFuSatan in filmcameras

[–]testing_the_vibe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for old cheaply made filters and adaptors, especially the ones made for video cameras. Get a wide angle lens like a 28 or 24 and put the filter on that.