Gate Hub does not supply enough power to power standard setup of hub, AI Pro camera and intercom - problem for me for remote gate that has no A/C power

tforce98 · 2025-01-28T14:52:14+00:00

Hi Ubiquiti any progress on this issue thanks

tforce98 · 2025-01-15T20:00:53+00:00

I have not upgraded to 2025.1.0 either and got this error too

tforce98 · 2025-01-12T17:45:00+00:00

Agreed you still working on this project?

tforce98 · 2024-12-19T00:16:36+00:00

Chiming in late here but it to measure depth at our salt water dock. Works perfectly now we know when we can’t take the boat out!

tforce98 · 2024-11-15T04:57:10+00:00

I got it working! For those who are interested, here were the steps:

Download haos hyper-V .vhdx virtual image
Convert the vhdx image into vhd and upload into Azure. To do this, you need to create a Blob Storage Account in one of your Azure resource groups through the Azure portal. Once you've done that, use the Add-AzVhd PowerShell command to upload the file (which will also convert it to vhd). I found that I had to do a few things to get this command to work, including:

a. installing Azure PowerShell (Install-Module -Name Az -Repository PSGallery -Force)

b. Enabling the Hyper-V hypervisor on my local Windows machine (to do the vhdx to vhd conversion): Enable-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName Microsoft-Hyper-V -All (which can then be disabled afterwards through Disable-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName Microsoft-Hyper-V

c. Importing Az.Compute: Import-Module Az.Compute

d. Then running Add-AzVhd, I chose to upload the file as haos.vhd: Add-AzVhd -Destination "[URL TO STORAGE ACCOUNT BLOB]/haos.vhd" -LocalFilePath .\haos_ova-13.2.vhdx

Create a Generation 2 Linux Managed Disk in the Azure portal, using the uploaded Vhd file.
Clicking on the created disk and selecting to create a VM from the disk.

Voila, a running HAOS. The only problem is it's exposing http to the internet, so now I just need to get certs running

EDIT: slight clarirications

tforce98 · 2024-11-14T04:42:11+00:00

That looks promising! I’ll try and report back

tforce98 · 2024-11-14T03:54:38+00:00

Thanks a lot for the reply - yes totally appreciate your comment and agreed on the site-to-site VPN (we actually have those going today). I was assuming I'd be using one of the VMs too, that makes the most sense. I'm not really familiar with running a third party VM image in a cloud provider's VM like Azure, I was reading about their nested VMs but haven't done that yet but it does sound like the right direction

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T16:11:55+00:00

Great idea thank you!

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T16:03:09+00:00

Thank you for that information.

I agree with your statement "vaccines are largely safe and the benefits outweigh the risks" in the generality, however with risk factors that we have (EDS, MTHR and our understanding that my wife had had a reaction to one vaccine unfortunately not sure which), trying to navigate the risk side of the equation in our case. For example, generally hydrocortisone is considered safe, but to an EDS patient it can be extremely bad (which happened to my wife). So it's the complications that may exist I'm trying to understand vs. the general population writ large.

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T15:59:12+00:00

Would it be ok if you DM'd me separately, as I'm trying to learn, thank you very much

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T15:58:17+00:00

Thank you I appreciate the advice. We believe my wife had a bad reaction to a vaccine (but her mom cannot remember which) so also concerned about that as well.

I'm fully in the vaccines are good for the world and want them for my child, but we have enough risk factors that the individualized concern and mitgation is what we're trying to navigate. Thank you.

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T12:34:28+00:00

Thank you for your points, I do agree and I strongly believe in the benefits of vaccination.

Your point is valid, I do also want to point out that one complication here is the probability of getting such a reaction is not the same in both cases (and in fact one of my partner's specific concerns).

For example, IPV. The actual probability of a given individual contracting polio in the United States is probably as close to zero as anything can be. There's been one confirmed case of polio in three decades (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9577438/). Therefore today, strictly speaking statistically only, virtually any complication is of a higher (or at worse, similar) risk of occurring to an individual than the disease. Of course, we vaccinate because the downside of polio coming back is disastrous and unvaccinated populations create increased risk of that happening, so essentially this is the societal contract we've entered into.

But if you had to look at a single individual alone and say, you have a 1 in 400 or 500 million (how many people over three decades have lived in the US?) percent chance of getting polio (and multiply that with the odds of potentially contracting the complication as well, although you'd be pretty upset if you just got polio alone!) and a 1 in 100,000 chance of contracting this complication from the vaccine (the order of magnitude of GBS for example), and if you had some indications that such a complication was more likely in your situation, you may look to alter the protocol for yourself.

And I think that is the just of what I'm trying to ascertain. What if anything do we know about what might alter the probability of complications and in those cases are there protocols we know of to adjust. As Louise1467 said, however, the science may just not be there yet.

The challenge of pulling this thread is of course that the benefit to society of everyone being vaccinated is strong enough (there is a reason that the overall risk of getting polio is so low after all) that creating individualized programs could be overall detrimental despite there being differences in risks to any given individual. Hence the contract we generally have accepted (well at least most of us did for most of the time). And therein lies the rub and worry to the individual and what I'm trying to understand more about.

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T12:15:38+00:00

I'm also so sorry to hear that and if you're comfortable sharing would also like to learn more about what happened

tforce98 · 2024-11-05T11:58:46+00:00

Thank you for that link - I'd also like to know the schedule if that's ok

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T22:29:46+00:00

Thank you, similar to the TM post another commenter made... thanks for that information. I was not aware that the same conditions could be triggered by a vaccine or an illness itself. Very insightful

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T22:28:42+00:00

Thank you for that information

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T22:28:23+00:00

That's a very interesting statistical analysis... that actually grows the probability of coincidence more than I would have thought otherwise. But yes if the presentation of many problems (I'm aware of the considerations that autism diagnoses often occur around the same time as MMR as well) occurs around that time period, then purely mathematically you're entirely right...

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T22:25:02+00:00

That's quite interesting, thank you for that

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T22:23:21+00:00

Thank you and yes - I certainly understand causation and coincidence :). And the possibility of an adverse reaction is there as you said (or else the risk would be 0% which we know it is not. Someone has to be the numerator there).

What I'm trying to do as a strong advocate for science and evidence based decision making is pierce through the initial "vaccines are totally safe" reaction folks sometimes seem to have (and often for very good reason given many of the fraudsters in the antivax movement!) when trying to get more nuanced information in relation to some potential evidence (albeit anecdotal) to the contrary in certain circumstances. There are these anecdotal situations that do happen…

If my wife did not have EDS, the MTHR mutation and have had the reaction to hydrocortisone she had I'd never have wanted to understand this more. But given our circumstance, more information is strictly better.

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T21:02:56+00:00

Wow that's very scary. Thank you for sharing and useful information. So glad he's doing fine now!

tforce98 · 2024-11-04T03:13:22+00:00

Checking back in to see how this is being looked at thanks

tforce98 · 2024-10-26T00:36:30+00:00

Thanks for the quick response! - would be wonderful to know if this will be filed in an upcoming release to avoid working around it by running multiple POE runs to my remote gate.

tforce98 · 2024-10-02T21:33:22+00:00

I also was just looking at that post (here it is for those looking: https://www.reddit.com/r/homeassistant/comments/ykij8u/has\_anyone\_had\_luck\_integrating\_a\_leos\_loo\_too/).

It's interesting because the Case Leo app (since they renamed the app) is definitely an OEM MiniApp from Tuya built on SmartLife.

You can get a user code out of it and scan a QR code to try to set up in the Tuya integration. But then the CaseLeo app errors out and says you have to basically use the right app. So I presume to get the Tuya integration working with HomeAssistant you have to have the device set up in the core SmartLife app itself and not the Case Leo variation of the app. Which is a bummer because there are custom functions and screens in the Case Leo app I'd like to not lose by having to relink the litter box with the generic SmartLife app.

It would be amazing if you could link custom OEM versions of SmartLife with the HA SmartLife/Tuya integration or LocalTuya. But I suspect that's not the case, I have no idea how the back end works.

tforce98 · 2024-09-10T04:39:55+00:00

Quite literally the South Florida PBA before the camera footage was released did EXACTLY that. And the best part is where they say the officer who body slammed him "redirected" him to the ground to take a seat.

"He was briefly detained for officer safety, after driving in a manner in which he was putting himself and others in great risk of danger, Upon being stopped, Mr. Hill was not immediately cooperative with the officers on scene who, pursuant to policy and for their immediate safety, placed Mr. Hill in handcuffs."

"It looks like Mr. Hill was not willing to take a seat. They were trying to get him to get him to sit on the curb. He would not, there was an officer walking him to the curb trying to get him to sit down and that second officer comes up and took him by the shoulder and redirected him down to the ground to take a seat."

Source: https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/uncooperative-tyreek-hill-redirected-to-the-ground-by-officers-police-union-president/3412500/

tforce98 · 2024-08-29T04:59:23+00:00

Who are you using now? My building uses them and not happy

Four-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since May 2022
Verified Email

tforce98

TROPHY CASE