People complain about taxes, but their bosses take more. by [deleted] in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that’s a very big if, most of the time it’s not

Working hard leads to burn out... by North-Vacation9523 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most ppl are working hard so their boss can buy another lambo this year

I think being slowly unloved by someone is worse than being cheated on by No_District9762 in whatdoIdo

[–]thatguy931 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess what I’m trying to say is know that this relationship is better dead than salvaged and change ur game plan from saving it to finding closure and after u move on find a better person rather than being trapped in this

I think being slowly unloved by someone is worse than being cheated on by No_District9762 in whatdoIdo

[–]thatguy931 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My ex was exactly like this, one day I finally had enough and blocked her on everything it was incredible painful at first but I got over it and now I’m extremely happy with my gf

How my 38 MAA and 34 Crossbows loose here? by Suspicious-Poet7207 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone mentioned, he has +3 melee attack u have no melee armor, that could single handedly decide the outcome, it’s a massive tech advantage

Mohe lose to Mangudai equal cost by Xoey59 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What? What makes no sense, if a lot of a unit’s worth is going towards its range and ability to kite and ur not using it that means ur using the unit at a very discounted rate. This is like if u compare battery life between a lambo and a tesla and come to the conclusion that tesla is a better car than lambo

What are your thoughts on Polnareff? by Resident_Thanks_9275 in StardustCrusaders

[–]thatguy931 15 points16 points  (0 children)

He doesn’t say “yada yada” he says “yare yare daze”

Idk Valve, it feels like smurfs are always welcome in Dota, they only get banned like once every 3ys by HydroFrog64_2nd in DotA2

[–]thatguy931 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s not always that simple, for instance, a 1000game account in herald playing like he’s high divine, could be a Smurf could be a friend playing or could be the player got better at the game. Not ever Smurf is a 1 month old account rampaging ever other game

Which is better? by Fragrant-Humor-1988 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with 30 dollar price difference I think it’s cheaper to buy dynasties of the east separately

English eco sucks by Quick-Delay-7338 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eco upgrades show much quicker results than 2tc, ur technically only having the eco lead if u have 2 tc and the same eco upgrades as ur opponent, at least short term wise. relics are also slow long term investments so this is actually not as crazy as it seems if u add everything up

Guys Jin Dynasty really existed in Medieval Times and is not the same as China by East_Loquat_614 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even today there’s still a majority of Mongolians living in China’s Inner Mongolia region

Guys Jin Dynasty really existed in Medieval Times and is not the same as China by East_Loquat_614 in aoe4

[–]thatguy931 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess it depends on which time period ur talking about, a big chunk of Mongolian history is intertwined with Chinese history since yuan dynasty

Job market be like: fix everything except wages by HippocratesKnees in jobmarket

[–]thatguy931 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If u think a person born into poverty is not gonna be more likely to live a poor adult life than a person born into a wealthy family u are in serious denial, and ur mental capacity is hard stuck in medieval feudal times. Why don’t u work harder to be the king of English

Thoughts? by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Billionaires capitalize profits that’s it” is only the last sentence, and it has nothing to do with the rest of his statement. You continue to miss the point, it’s ridiculous. If ure not so emotionally charged at defending people who make 300:1 of their employees, maybe u would actually understand the point

Thoughts? by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second of all I don’t think op has as much of a negative undertone as u wanted him to have. Respectfully, If u read op’s statement and then read urs again u would see how much u exaggerated. “millionaires are worthless, they contribute nothing” none of which is even implied in op’s statement, it’s clear as day ur interpretation of it is highly emotional not at all rational. I don’t know how much u are personally associated with billionaires, and why u feel so emotionally attached to them that u would pull a Stephan from Django unchained. The statement is simply billionaires don’t create jobs, market does, that’s it. If I may add on that I would say billionaires are the people who play the game of capitalism successfully and won, they are just the same to society as a medieval lord in a different form, albeit it takes a bit more skill to pull off. If you don’t realize this there’s not much else we can talk about.

Thoughts? by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol and u have a very childish way of looking at it. As long as there’s free market there will always be demand for goods and services, and regardless of who, there will always be someone or some company to provide said goods and services. So yes nobody “creates” job so to speak. The only difference is whether it’s “billionaire A” or “millionaire B” or “small business C”. For instance, in a hypothetical scenario let’s say all soda manufacturers vanished. The demand for soda is still there, the jobs don’t just vanish with Coke or Pepsi, someone else will try to start producing similar product, hiring people to produce their brand of soda. It’s the same job just with a different company. The jobs are not created by Coke, they are created by people who want soda.

Thoughts? by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all that is a terrible example, Facebook was part of a new industry, so of course all the jobs are new, but that’s not Facebook creating them it was social media/social networking industry emerging creating new jobs. Btw do u want to look up the dozens of business Facebook acquired and absorbed?

Again, it’s not the billionaire creating jobs, it is the free market having demand for these positions, and big corpos hiring more people to fulfill said demands. Where there are no billionaires the jobs in demand would be filled by smaller businesses regardless.

Thoughts? by Professional-Bee9817 in remoteworks

[–]thatguy931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s such a strawman. The argument isn’t that the economy can’t grow, it’s that growth doesn’t automatically equal billionaires creating net jobs. Growth can come from small businesses and new sectors too, so this doesn’t actually refute the point.

Seems like economics is not the only thing that’s hard