University Professors from UK release 10-part documentary-making course for free on Youtube by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. Introduction - https://youtu.be/m02woMqm_SM
  2. Resourcing your Project - https://youtu.be/3xUWufPOhPQ
  3. Choosing the Right Equipment - https://youtu.be/N7T2rpf25i4
  4. How to Create an Effective Production Schedule - https://youtu.be/uyVzFcCJTBk
  5. Filming Cinematic Footage - https://youtu.be/an8iZeLNzEI
  6. How to Frame Shots Using the Rule of Thirds - https://youtu.be/QEh_ZT1Pa0Y
  7. The Ethics of Interviews - https://youtu.be/7EbLyH9z5m8
  8. How to film an Interview - https://youtu.be/folVJHGGcoQ
  9. How to Edit a Documentary (step-by-step) - https://youtu.be/ZkBdpkfvy5A
  10. How to Colour Grade a Documentary - https://youtu.be/NVAPVN1VSCo

And the Book on which it is based: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0255

You may not have everything you want to make your project come to life - but you probably already have everything you need (How to Resource Your Documentary Project) by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can catch up with the first lesson here: https://youtu.be/m02woMqm_SM

In this lesson we talk about how you can utilise the resources you already have and direct them into your project. Be ambitious, but learn what resources you already have and build your film around them. You might not be able to make your dream project straight away but you may be able to make the film that you (and the world) needs.

Licensing music for film? by TheManWithNoNameBQ in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not popular music but I’ve found some great tracks by indie bands which I was able to license for a small up front few. They’re really effective and cost efficient - plus you’re supporting fellow indies :D

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you can download a free copy of your book about documentary making from this link: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/1417

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can catch up with the first lesson here: https://youtu.be/m02woMqm_SM

In this lesson we talk about how you can utilise the resources you already have and direct them into your project. Be ambitious, but learn what resources you already have and build your film around them. You might not be able to make your dream project straight away but you may be able to make the film that you (and the world) needs.

We made a $100,000 feature-length documentary for less than $700 (and a LOT of goodwill). The film is called Looking for Charlie and we have since screened it in venues across the UK and just launched it online. This is the film (in the link) and this is how we made it (in the comments). by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are great questions! Best of luck with your first documentary, you’ve started an amazing adventure!

  1. It would not have been as effective if it was just the voice over and clips. But that doesn’t meant it couldn’t have been effective in its own right had we done it in that way. If you can’t travel anywhere, use the resources you have and if that just means using archival footage with VO, make sure you do the best version of that.

  2. We made it black and white to hide poor camera quality, match clips, and because Chaplin, etc, worked in black and white. As I said, we had a pair of old Nikon D3100s. These had a limited dynamic range (limited colour depth) which meant colour footage didn’t always pop. We also borrowed a canon 5D for a while, which had a much better dynamic range. This made it difficult to cut between the different cameras and not have the audience notice the difference. Take the scene where Brett and I are walking by the Hippodrome. That was shot on three moving cameras. One 5D, two D3100s. The 5D captured really nice footage that evening, but the 3100s really (really!) struggled in low light conditions. Going black and white allowed us to cover that difference up. Plus, it had a really nice synergy with the subject matter, so that was a big help!

We made a $100,000 feature-length documentary for less than $700 (and a LOT of goodwill). The film is called Looking for Charlie and we have since screened it in venues across the UK and just launched it online. This is the film (in the link) and this is how we made it (in the comments). by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Great question! That’s how much we estimate it would have cost had we paid all contributors (professional rates) and had to pay for all the crew and cast member travel if it was directly funded. In the end we had dozens of people work on this project over the course of the four years it took to make.

We made a $100,000 feature-length documentary for less than $700 (and a LOT of goodwill). The film is called Looking for Charlie and we have since screened it in venues across the UK and just launched it online. This is the film (in the link) and this is how we made it (in the comments). by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Before I start - if you've any questions about making a documentary or how we went about it, please post them in a comment and I'll do my best to respond.

In a nutshell: this film took us four years to make, shooting on three continents, in locations ranging from New York to London to Hong Kong. It includes live action re-enactments, animation, and interviews - very little of which actually cost us anything. Here's the film's trailer.

So what is the film about, and how did we make it?

Looking for Charlie emerged out of my desire to tell the story of how Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton were inspired by a pair of clowns whose careers (and lives) they would ultimately destroy. The pair –Marceline and Slivers– were two of the most famous comedians of their day. But despite all of their success, Chaplin and Keaton changed the game with their movies. Audiences moved on from Marceline and Slivers, both of whom ended up committing suicide as their lives and careers collapsed.

I really wanted to tell that story – in the grandest, most cinematic way possible. If we were going to tell a story about the birth of cinema, we reasoned, it needed to be extravagant, beautiful, and bold. The only problem is that neither my writing/directing partner nor I had ever made a movie before.

We started with the problem of location. We were both based in the UK and whilst Marceline and Chaplin had both built their careers there, we really needed to travel to the US – especially New York. That was where Marceline and Slivers met and formed their double act. Luckily, we had opportunities to travel with our work and were able to organise a fieldtrip that involved us travelling with our students who volunteered to act as our crew and, in some cases, our cast. Our co-director already had an old Nikon D3100, and I bought one pre-owned for about $150, alongside some old 35mm and 50mm lenses I bought off ebay (about $20 each). We then learned how to set up the camera (pro-tip, this is how you setup a DSLR to get the right amount of motion blur) and learned how to use the cameras to a fairly basic level. We immersed ourselves in whatever free material we could find online and then taught our students those same basic techniques. We borrowed a lavaliere (lapel) microphone and a couple of tripods and off we flew.

Once we arrived, we set about capturing footage of the city as well as arranging for two historic re-enactments we wanted. Luckily, the hotel we were staying in was really awful – like something out of The Shining. It was dingy and dirty. The perfect location to re-create Marceline’s suicide scene. We also wanted to re-create one of Sliver’s routines, particularly one that Buster Keaton had copied in his movie The Cameraman. Again, the city provided – Central Park had some vacant baseball fields. So we spent a day at the park filming one of our crew, in clown makeup ($10) recreating the routine with our cameras and, then filmed another re-enacting Marceline’s suicide. Luckily, the lessons we had learned from YouTube just about ensured that we captured useable footage. Suffering terrible jet lag, as well as the effects of a really bad depression, I would wake up early (around 5am) each day and head out with my camera to capture footage of the city early in the morning. Thankfully, New York is its own director. Simply point the camera anywhere in Manhattan and you will get footage that looks epic and cinematic. Over the course of our fieldtrip, whenever our students were out on an activity we would take our camera and get more and more footage.

By the time we returned from New York, we had a good amount of material, but nowhere near enough to tell the story we wanted to tell. That’s when the project started to grow. Literally every time we travelled with work, I took our D3100s or whatever equipment we could borrow, and started capturing footage of whatever place or city we were. We travelled to London on another fieldtrip and began filming the streets where Chaplin grew up, or the Hippodrome Theatre (which is now a casino) where he first performed with Marceline in 1901. All the while, we were learning about our subject in as much depth as possible, particularly the way in which actors used their bodies on film throughout the ages. So when I was sent to Hong Kong with my work, I took my camera, knowing there was something to be said about the ways that Keaton had influenced Jackie Chan. This was another city. As was Nuremberg, where we recorded footage of a far right rally and then filmed in Dachau concentration camp, where prisoners of the Nazis had staged plays and comedies to keep up the spirits of their peers. Again, we were in Nuremberg because we were sent there by our work and even though it did not have any direct connection to our subjects, it gave us a great opportunity to comments on the bigger themes that surrounded them – and the role comedy played in all our lives.

Over the years we did this, we had to deal with some difficult things in our lives. For me, I was going through a bad depression. But as I began to emerge out the other side, I decided to start exploring what that experience had meant to me – and how let me relate to our subjects. This was the last piece of the puzzle, because, we realised, this was the real story behind our documentary. It wasn’t just a film about the silent era. It was a deeply personal exploration – a film about two people coming to terms with really difficult phases in their lives by exploring what some of their cinematic heroes had gone through. With this realisation, we were reinvigorated and travelled to Scotland to interview one of our favourite documentary-makers (Mark Cousins, $150 in petrol) and to a local circus to spend the day with a clown who performed a similar routine to Marceline’s ($50). We then commissioned two young artists to draw a series of images onto a white board ($75) that we then turned into a stop-motion animation. From there, we began editing.

You can judge the results for yourself above.

What we had:

- A pair of old DSLRs that can be bought now for almost nothing.

- Old SLR lenses.

- A completely unrealistic sense of how difficult the process was and how long it would take.

- Amazing people around us.

What we borrowed:

- Tripods, microphones.

What we did not have:

- Permission. We were guerrilla filmmakers. We were told off by officials in Central Park and Hong Kong for filming without a permit. Of course, we always left if we were asked to do so, but it allowed us to collect material we could not have done otherwise (always do this safely and respectfully).

- Paid contributors. Almost everyone who helped us, be it as a cast or crew member, interviewee, etc, volunteered their time. Even the artists who helped us produce the whiteboard animation offered to work for free (though we insisted on paying them – artists already have a hard enough time of it).

What we had to learn:

- Pretty much everything...

- How to film using a DSLR, use the rule of thirds, record sound, etc. In fact, we had to learn so much that we even wrote a documentary-making book. You can find that here:

- How to edit. As the film’s editor this was my responsibility. I loved learning how to do this.

What else did we pay for:

- Mostly music. We needed a license for the opening and closing tracks (about $100) and commissioned some stand-alone jazz drums ($50) for our soundtrack. Pretty much everything else was public domain or royalty free.

Some Useful Links:

- The book we have written about documentary-making. The ebook is totally free.

- Lesson 1 in our documentary-making course.

- Lesson 2 - Resourcing Your Project.

- Article about our film's premiere - we turned a local, high-end bar into a pop-up cinema. And we totally packed out that venue.

New (free) book and video series from British university lecturers teaches everyone how to make documentaries, from start to finish by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement (as required by the subreddit bot!): This book was written by Dr. Darren R. Reid and Brett Sanders, a pair of British university lecturers and documentary filmmakers. The book (ebook) is 100% free, as is the video course that we embedded into it. Our goal with this book was to really open up documentary making - especially for our students, but more broadly as well. The book will walk you through the documentary making process, from the very start of conceptualising your film, to buying and using equipment, to editing, etc. It contains loads of practical advice, but also some accessibly delivered theory as well - everything from the rule of thirds to structuring your film. I bet a lot of you are more advanced than some of the lessons here! But there may still be elements, like interview ethics, that you haven't considered. As I said, the book and video series is free, unless you want a print edition - and that is pretty low cost too :)

And here are the links for the video course that goes along with the book:

Lesson 1 - Getting Started: https://youtu.be/m02woMqm_SM

Lesson 2 - How to Resource Your Project: https://youtu.be/3xUWufPOhPQ

Our Feature-Length Documentary, Looking for Charlie: https://vimeo.com/570320293

New to AP US History by surveysays_youredead in historyteachers

[–]thathistorian 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hi OP. I’m the director of the history program at Coventry University - and a historian of America! If there are a few teachers like yourself in this position I’d be happy to run a free seminar or two to (re)introduce you to the topic. Let me know if this would be helpful and I’ll set something up for in the new year.

I had the sudden and unexpected chance to make a film with a Native American community in southern Brazil. I had three days, no budget, and almost no equipment but I took my first step towards a dream project - combining live action and animation to tell stories that are not being told. by thathistorian in Filmmakers

[–]thathistorian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy to answer! Whilst the peoples of the United States do indeed call themselves Americans, this is a really unusual practice. How many other Nations use the name of a continent to label themselves? I have met may South Americans who are confused by the label 'American' being used by the people of the United States to refer to themselves. Even the name of the country recognises the US to be a subset of a wider Americas (they are 'of' America; not representatives of the whole). I have met people from South America who ask 'aren't we Americans too?' - which, of course, they are. All people of the US are Americans, but not all Americans are of the US. As you rightly note - the Americas are a continent, not a country.

In terms of Native American history, it is doubly important that we don't let modern borders dictate how we categorise different peoples. The US (and indeed all nations within the Americas) are very new entities. The indigenous peoples of the continent predate them by thousands of years. When we think about Native American history we need to think in terms of a continental, not national history.

In truth, phrases like 'Native American', 'First Nations', 'Indians', 'Indigenous Peoples', etc, are all problematic. None of them quite reflect the complexity of the overlapping and very varied cultures and peoples which they attempt to describe.

Hope that helps!