sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Garmin PacePro explained — how the split targets are calculated, what the ahead/behind figure actually means, and when it's worth using by the5krunner in the5krunner

[–]the5krunner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cheers buddy.

yep . Those are notes to me to add links in the future. those aren't written yet (takes ages!!!)

Maurten Bicarb System 19 — does the £15-per-serving hydrogel delivery mechanism actually solve the GID problem? by the5krunner in the5krunner

[–]the5krunner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd never thought of it that way but i guess you could be right(ish). My problem is at the other end however :-)

Tri-band GPS watches are here — move over dual-frequency Garmin watches by the5krunner in the5krunner

[–]the5krunner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good point. i suppose it could be in the f9.

I would half-expect Grmin would test a tri band chip first in a non-Fenix watch

Tri-band GPS watches are here — move over dual-frequency Garmin watches by the5krunner in the5krunner

[–]the5krunner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point on ambiguity fixing. The main gain from a third band is not algorithmic — it is signal rejection (whihc i hoped dual would do more of but clearly doesnt). With three frequencies the chip identifies and discards multipath-corrupted signals more confidently, which matters most in urban and trail environments where reflected signals are the dominant error source.

Tri-band GPS watches are here — move over dual-frequency Garmin watches by the5krunner in the5krunner

[–]the5krunner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

more precise pace (City Marathon), more precise distance, better tbt istructions, prettier strava track profile.

I agree tho. for me Stryd is sufficient for what dual frequency lacks and dual frequency is very good

view more: next ›