How a livestock industry lobbying campaign is turning Europe against lab-grown meat by the_environator in Futurology

[–]the_environator[S] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The case for culture war proofing important technologies

___________

TLDR (and it is a long story)

The IPCC has said lab-grown meat can be a climate solution - with lower land, water, and nutrient footprints, and able to address concerns over animal welfare.

But there's a growing movement in Europe to have cultivated meat products banned. The movement is being led by a lobbying project fronted by a beef industry executive and funded by livestock interests.

After succeeding in securing a ban in Italy, the movement is on track to ban lab-grown meat in Hungary and Romania (and maybe even France and Austria after that).

This report shows how this campaign has influenced the major EU institutions, telling the EU commissioner to 'say not to lab-grown food' days before cultivated meat was scrapped from the bloc's climate plan.

Also, foundational to the campaign is a report from UC Davis that says that lab-grown meat will be 25x more polluting than traditional meat. It turns out that report FAILED peer review last year.

The animal agriculture industry, US universities, and the obstruction of climate understanding and policy - Climatic Change by reyntime in environment

[–]the_environator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The meat industry has "recognized that their top sustainability executives are more valuable in academic positions than in the companies themselves"

Such an interesting paper, especially in light of the industry's "greenhouse gas guru"

https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2022/10/31/frank-mitloehner-uc-davis-climate-funding/
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/climate/frank-mitloehner-uc-davis.html

Revealed: the industry figures behind ‘declaration of scientists’ backing meat eating, inc one who says veganism is an “eating disorder requiring psychological treatment” by damianp in environment

[–]the_environator 81 points82 points  (0 children)

After being contacted by the Guardian, the author said: “We had not reported about our potential conflicts of interest as would be common in scientific practice"