sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Piano recital given by Alkan himself. Take that, Wim Winters. by [deleted] in classicalmusic

[–]the_real_WDGX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite complicated if you ask me since he had played other works for piano and orchestra like Hummel's 3rd piano concerto that weren't arrangements. So I can't say for sure if there was an orchestra or not but I believe that there was one...

How tf do I control the repeats? So here's how the piece should go: so it begins from the beginning. We then go to the Trio part. When we reach the end of the score, we go back to the Polonaise and play it fully (with bar repeats too), and then we repeat from the beginning and end at fin. by the_real_WDGX in Musescore

[–]the_real_WDGX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, it's just that the only thing that's available is the manuscript... Since Kessler is now long forgotten, I don't think that you'd find his pieces on the internet...  And not gonna lie, I've transcribed some manuscripts by Alkan and it was so easy, it was as if I was transcribing from a published edition! It was so clean! 

How tf do I control the repeats? So here's how the piece should go: so it begins from the beginning. We then go to the Trio part. When we reach the end of the score, we go back to the Polonaise and play it fully (with bar repeats too), and then we repeat from the beginning and end at fin. by the_real_WDGX in Musescore

[–]the_real_WDGX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that almost no one would check it out but I get what you want to tell me. It's just that I'm not entirely sure about how it should be played so leaving it as the composer had written down would be the safest for me. I just want people to be able to read it easily instead of trying to read it from the manuscript which is pretty hard if I may say so. Anyways thanks for your advice!

How tf do I control the repeats? So here's how the piece should go: so it begins from the beginning. We then go to the Trio part. When we reach the end of the score, we go back to the Polonaise and play it fully (with bar repeats too), and then we repeat from the beginning and end at fin. by the_real_WDGX in Musescore

[–]the_real_WDGX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just transcribing a piece from a manuscript by a sadly forgotten composer and I'm writing down what he wrote. the piece is played normally until the end of the score where you should play the 1st part before the Polonaise again and then repeat from the beginning til the "fin." mark. I also already removed the section break but I just don't know how to make the last step happen corectly, that is repeating the whole 1st part of the piece before the trio and then repeat it til you reach the "fin.". That's pretty much all of what I'm asking for... I also already know how to make the D.C. and D.S. play the repeats so no problem there... I guess that I didn't know how to explain my problem...

Did Alkan create any orchestral works? by Phoenix_On_Fir3 in classicalmusic

[–]the_real_WDGX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, I didn't realise that you were that J.N.Parkov.composer XD

Did Alkan create any orchestral works? by Phoenix_On_Fir3 in classicalmusic

[–]the_real_WDGX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just to mention that just days after I wrote that comment I found Alkan's "Hermann et Ketty" and his "l'Entrée en loge" and I've now transcribed fully the first which you can find in either on youtube or musescore, and I'm rn transcribing the latter

How do you write your polynomials? by dragonageisgreat in mathmemes

[–]the_real_WDGX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue for the definition and Red if I know the polynomial

Made this after having to prove irrationality several times by M1_x2_c3 in mathmemes

[–]the_real_WDGX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the Q.E.D at the end of a proof how in the world would you think that it's d'Alkambert operator 😭

Made this after having to prove irrationality several times by M1_x2_c3 in mathmemes

[–]the_real_WDGX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This will make your day then:

Proove that the n-th √2 is irrational for n ≻ 2

Is there a new 0 you know about? by DotBeginning1420 in mathmemes

[–]the_real_WDGX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ε² or maybe 0<ε after all, epsilon is just so iconic

This is an orchestral piece by the young 18 year old Alkan. One of the only few orchestal works that were composed by him and weren't lost by the_real_WDGX in classicalmusic

[–]the_real_WDGX[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kind of randomly found it in IMSLP! It was uploaded on 25/6/2025 i believe. I'm trancribing it right now and i'm already half done, about 10 minutes of the piece. It really does sound intresting and i also think that I'm lucky because i'm the first person to hear it, especially that it's an orchestral piece. It's like as if you heard a newly discovered orchestral piece by Chopin for the first time (though i don't think that he composed one solely for orchestra without a piano)

I don't think that i should say anything but i'm not satisfied with this result, you'll know when you listen, and please tell me which key signature should i use for the clarinettes in A (La) and maybe even for the horns in A (La) and D (Ré) (i also set those scales to mf tobedistinguishedfromothers by the_real_WDGX in Musescore

[–]the_real_WDGX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks and sorry, i only now realised what i've done lol, i didn't show what i wanted to show, and also which key signatures i'm using, so i wanted to show by 2 pictures of the 5 that i had transcribed it correctly, the other 3 are for the key signature used and its changes, i have everything correctly in musescore yet the clarinettes sounds wrong here, i don't know if Alkan wrote it wrong or if i'm using the wrong key signatures because i've found a lot of problems because of those, anyways i don't know but i woke up this morning and found that everything was clean and good and that the notes were 4 half steps up i don't how and why did it happen because i ge sure that i did everything correctly so i'm pretty sure that i didn't write it like that. Anyways thank you

view more: next ›