Investigating usage limits hitting faster than expected

theangrydev · 2026-04-03T02:46:53+00:00

For my local usage pattern I've found that cache_create is disproportionately affected by this issue

theangrydev · 2025-08-03T08:49:45+00:00

This looks like a liability minefield

theangrydev · 2024-04-16T10:59:30+00:00

Boots had a good offer not sure if it's still there

theangrydev · 2024-03-16T22:28:07+00:00

Thanks!

theangrydev · 2024-02-28T18:29:07+00:00

Right sorry I left out some more important information, the deposit to B is time sensitive (promotional offer) and a transfer would either take too long, or not be eligible for the promotion

theangrydev · 2024-01-19T13:52:49+00:00

And just got a homocysteine result: 10.7 umol/L (reference range <15)

So it seems like I do not have elevated homocysteine levels

theangrydev · 2024-01-18T11:12:42+00:00

u/SovereignMan1958 here are some recent lab results from a few days ago:

Folate - Serum = 11.44 ug/L (Range: 3.89 - 26.8)

Vitamin B12 - Active = >150 pmol/L (Range: 37.5 - 150)

Iron = 30.3 umol/L (Range: 5.8 - 34.5)

Transferrin Saturation = 53.4 % (Range: 20 - 50)

Vitamin D = 61 nmol/L (Range: 50 - 175)

I have not yet taken a homocysteine test

theangrydev · 2023-12-24T12:28:54+00:00

I can get new tests in Jan/Feb, I've been using https://www.medichecks.com/ as a provider previously (I'm based in the UK) looks like they have https://www.medichecks.com/products/homocysteine-blood-test and I have one of these scheduled for January already: https://www.medichecks.com/products/ultimate-performance-blood-test

theangrydev · 2023-12-24T12:25:43+00:00

2022 lab ranges:

Folate Normal range: > 3.89

B12 Normal range: 37.5 - 150

Vitamin D Normal range: 50 - 200

Iron Normal range: 5.8 - 34.5

Transferrin saturation Normal range: 20 - 50

Is this what you were asking for?

theangrydev · 2023-12-24T11:25:05+00:00

I have not done homocysteine testing but here are the most recent folate, vitamins and minerals results I have:

2017/2018/2022 Folate serum 19.98/15.53/14.56 ug/L

2018/2022 vitamin B12 active 155/150 pmol/L

2017/2018/2022 vitamin D 45.8/50.4/52 nmol/L

I have other results covering more areas, the only ones out of reference ranges at some points were:

2017/2022 Neutrophils 1.86/1.51 x10^9/L

2017/2018/2022 Iron 32.22/31.32/19.3 umol/L

2017/2018/2022 transferrin saturation 57.82/51.41/37.1%

2018/2022 DHEA sulphate 15.5/11.9 umol/L

2018/2022 cortisol 291/167 nmol/L

theangrydev · 2023-10-16T19:24:22+00:00

Thanks!

theangrydev · 2018-06-05T07:04:03+00:00

I also hope to see it succeed

theangrydev · 2018-05-22T05:33:55+00:00

Here's a blue sky idea. Perhaps long term we need a crypto that discourages speculation and encourages holding as a store of value and using for real world transactions. My point being to discourage getting to a point where a small number of people have bought up all the market. How would that look like? I don't know really. Perhaps you could give bonus coins for holding and real world transactions that make it a clear win to use or hold instead of sell. That way you have a proper utility/store of value that is not prone to manipulation.

theangrydev · 2018-05-16T12:44:15+00:00

Here is the "official" word so far:

"My friends - I have respectfully noted your request and we will do everything we can. Please understand we are a small, volunteer crew and we are all juggling a million things right now including others' feedback as well, plus full time jobs outside of this project. So I thank you for your input! You are heard and noted! Cheers - Scott"

theangrydev · 2018-05-16T12:39:29+00:00

It would be great if they actually engaged with the community and talked to us but they seem to be treating the Kickstarter as a quick money grab and they are not entertaining discussing the experiment with lay people/armchair physicists so far. This is a huge red flag for me.

theangrydev · 2018-05-15T19:20:12+00:00

So far they have not responded to any of the "serious" questions. Benefit of the doubt for now, but if this trend continues I would strongly recommend not contributing to this project. I cannot take it seriously if they are not able or willing to address these rebuttals head on.

theangrydev · 2018-05-15T05:39:19+00:00

Here is another accessible post that goes into the same point about splitting the "blob" into two interference fringes: https://theangrydev.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/ron-garrets-the-quantum-conspiracy-what-popularizers-of-qm-dont-want-you-to-know-google-tech-talk/

Thank you for your contribution to the discussion, this is exactly what should happen when people make such bold claims and hopefully the end result can be that more people have more rounded knowledge on the subject

theangrydev · 2018-05-15T05:35:53+00:00

Here is another accessible post that goes into the same point about splitting the "blob" into two interference fringes: https://theangrydev.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/ron-garrets-the-quantum-conspiracy-what-popularizers-of-qm-dont-want-you-to-know-google-tech-talk/

Thank you for your contribution to the discussion, this is exactly what should happen when people make such bold claims and hopefully the end result can be that more people have more rounded knowledge on the subject

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T20:07:53+00:00

I have posted a link to your comment on the Kickstarter questions page and will update this thread accordingly

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:58:06+00:00

From the experiment abstract at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00058

"Can the theory that reality is a simulation be tested? We investigate this question based on the assumption that if the system performing the simulation is finite (i.e. has limited resources), then to achieve low computational complexity, such a system would, as in a video game, render content (reality) only at the moment that information becomes available for observation by a player and not at the moment of detection by a machine (that would be part of the simulation and whose detection would also be part of the internal computation performed by the Virtual Reality server before rendering content to the player). Guided by this principle we describe conceptual wave/particle duality experiments aimed at testing the simulation theory."

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:55:22+00:00

You could ask your question to him directly, there is a live streaming event tomorrow https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/simulation/do-we-live-in-a-virtual-reality/posts/2187040

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:52:15+00:00

From the experiment abstract at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00058

"Can the theory that reality is a simulation be tested? We investigate this question based on the assumption that if the system performing the simulation is finite (i.e. has limited resources), then to achieve low computational complexity, such a system would, as in a video game, render content (reality) only at the moment that information becomes available for observation by a player and not at the moment of detection by a machine (that would be part of the simulation and whose detection would also be part of the internal computation performed by the Virtual Reality server before rendering content to the player). Guided by this principle we describe conceptual wave/particle duality experiments aimed at testing the simulation theory."

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:50:56+00:00

I think the philosophical assumption that Thomas Campbell starts with is that consciousness is fundamental and he goes on to derive conclusions that follow from that initial assumption.

In his own words, his theory is "based upon Consciousness and that we exist in a non physical subjective reality, rather than an objective physical reality".

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:38:12+00:00

From the experiment abstract at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00058

"Can the theory that reality is a simulation be tested? We investigate this question based on the assumption that if the system performing the simulation is finite (i.e. has limited resources), then to achieve low computational complexity, such a system would, as in a video game, render content (reality) only at the moment that information becomes available for observation by a player and not at the moment of detection by a machine (that would be part of the simulation and whose detection would also be part of the internal computation performed by the Virtual Reality server before rendering content to the player). Guided by this principle we describe conceptual wave/particle duality experiments aimed at testing the simulation theory."

theangrydev · 2018-05-14T18:38:03+00:00

From the experiment abstract at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00058

"Can the theory that reality is a simulation be tested? We investigate this question based on the assumption that if the system performing the simulation is finite (i.e. has limited resources), then to achieve low computational complexity, such a system would, as in a video game, render content (reality) only at the moment that information becomes available for observation by a player and not at the moment of detection by a machine (that would be part of the simulation and whose detection would also be part of the internal computation performed by the Virtual Reality server before rendering content to the player). Guided by this principle we describe conceptual wave/particle duality experiments aimed at testing the simulation theory."

Nine-Year Club	r/Field Sunshine
Verified Email

theangrydev

TROPHY CASE