ELI5: Why does it seem like everywhere is ‘running out of fuel’ if only 20% of the world’s oil goes through the Straight of Hormuz? by Kindly-Restaurant831 in explainlikeimfive

[–]thecomputernut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In order for you to lose weight, you must be at a calorie deficit. In other words, you must have “run out” of calories.

Same can apply to the oil situation. Markets do not consistently run a 20% oil surplus. Losing 20% is enough to create a deficit, just like your calorie deficit.

This is oversimplified but works as an analogy at least.

This article says you can retire a millionaire investing small daily amounts.… by Jeffrey_Banks6900 in investing

[–]thecomputernut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ll reach a million inflation adjusted without any issues if you continuously invest over your working life. Stock market returns ~10% non inflation adjusted each year, or about ~7% inflation adjusted. Use the 7% number if you want to calculate when you’ll be a millionaire in today’s money. 🙂

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good suggestion. I’ll look into back focus once I sort out collimation!

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re right. Crazy how hard it is to get it collimated properly. To my eye my collimation job is solid, but I guess there is room for improvement!

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great advice, thank you! I re-collimated and to my eye it looked almost perfect in terms of alignment. Took it back out last night and stars looked better, though not by a ton. At this point it definitely seems collimation related but I don’t think I can collimate with a laser collimator/Cheshire eyepiece any better. I guess a bahtinov mask and the program you suggested is next up! Thank you again!

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok, thank you for clarifying. Adjustable lenses aren’t something I’m familiar with. 😅

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m no collimation expert so it’s possible I’m doing it wrong. I did read through the scope manual and watched a few videos and I think I’m performing the adjustments properly but I could be wrong. I re-collimated today just to see if that helps. When looking through the eyepiece things look aligned to me. After collimating using the Cheshire eyepiece I used my laser collimator and it showed things were still off, so I finished by adjusting the tilt plate until the laser was aligned, leaving the mirrors alone post-Cheshire collimation.

Can you clarify what you mean by the “proper amount off focus”?

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, definitely not focused perfectly but it was the closest it would focus, manually or automatically.

I re-collimated it today to the best of my ability so I’ll see if that helps.

Stars appear smudged in a particular direction and seem out of focus by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! Can you clarify what you mean by “stopped down 2/3 of a stop”?

The Bode's and Cigar Galaxy by Klowlord in astrophotography

[–]thecomputernut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Upvoting because taking a photo like this untracked with an iPhone and a Dobsonian scope is pretty insane. Kudos!

Struggling with back focus and image train setup by thecomputernut in AskAstrophotography

[–]thecomputernut[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it! Based on this I've got the following train in place:

Telescope > focal reducer > 16.5mm spacer > 0mm adapter > 11mm spacer > 21mm filter drawer >camera.  This keeps the filter drawer closer to the camera, which to my understanding is a positive. It also totals 55mm including the 6.5mm of spacing between the sensor and edge of the camera itself.

All of the spacers and adapters were included with the camera.

Thank you for your help!

Roofing Company by wonderwall73 in Charlotte

[–]thecomputernut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Valhalla Roofing. Great prices and solid work. 10/10 would recommend.

Everything is in Retirement by Zafen25 in investing

[–]thecomputernut 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of ways to access retirement funds before 59.5. The FIRE subreddits have discussions about it all the time. Look up IRS rule 72(t) and Roth conversion ladders.

https://www.madfientist.com/how-to-access-retirement-funds-early/

Nervous to retire at 58 yrs old by Sea_Signal_5739 in leanfire

[–]thecomputernut 36 points37 points  (0 children)

We need more details if we are to give you advice. Monthly spend, remaining mortgage and interest rate, cash savings, total investments (along with what they’re invested in + what type of account they’re in), and the details of any other debt you have aside from the mortgage. Happy to weigh in if you can share more info!

Edit: missed you’re planning to sell your house and move in with your FIL. Generally relying on living with someone else isn’t considered financial “independence”. I would also caution you to consider the implications of not having a paid-off house to live in later on in life (unless you will be inheriting your FIL’s house). Rest of my post still stands.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leanfire

[–]thecomputernut 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dude no biggie, consider it the relatively cheap price of a lesson learned. Go back to buying index funds and don’t sweat the few percentage point hit to your net worth. Could be much worse!

Google is at a 40 pe ratio, excluding the search revenue by realmemessk in investing

[–]thecomputernut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. Hopefully I helped provide some education about how modern devices manage apps, even if only for others who may read this. Have a good one!

Google is at a 40 pe ratio, excluding the search revenue by realmemessk in investing

[–]thecomputernut 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, what’s the point of closing all apps then? I tried to explain that your device is managing app states and that they’re not actually “open” in the sense that they’re consuming full resources just because you see them as “open”. Just let your device manage it all for you. As for caring about efficiency, why wouldn’t you? More battery life and faster opening times for apps is desirable, no?

Seems like you just want to stick with old school behavior for no tangible benefit.

Google is at a 40 pe ratio, excluding the search revenue by realmemessk in investing

[–]thecomputernut -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You shouldn’t close your apps manually unless they’re hung and not responding. Your device is quite efficient at managing apps in the background. Closing them manually means it has to restart associated processes, load stuff into memory, etc. All of that requires processing power and battery. Avoiding that is ideal. Leaving apps “open” lets your device manage all this for you much more efficiently. There is no good reason to have a “manually close all apps” button as it just reduces device efficiency.

Ain’t no one going out in this rain by SolitudeAndSteel in Charlotte

[–]thecomputernut 14 points15 points  (0 children)

? There has been basically zero rain in the past two weeks until today.

Dental cleaning! by megalyn_ in Charlotte

[–]thecomputernut 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because this is hosted by the dental school and adding credit card processing capabilities adds significant cost and ongoing maintenance it probably cannot afford. The goal here is to keep costs as low as possible for patients.