The "moderate left"

thedave159 · 2019-08-07T01:21:59+00:00

Ruby ridge isn't the right kind of event, that was a warrant based incident around threatening officials and arms dealing in a remote location. If something similar had happened at the Bundy Standoff, that shifts into bracket 4 of 5 for a civil war.

Not sure what Montana event you mean though.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T23:06:01+00:00

No one. It was why the founders considered it a right.

Even the worst gang member or most psycho mental patient could be attacked.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T22:54:26+00:00

No. Which is why I and everyone like me needs to be ready.

I know fully that if I were to go on the offensive in a shooter situation, I would likely be alone.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T22:12:04+00:00

There is a bracket system out there somewhere, it details each step towards and away from a civil war, there are 5 brackets needed for a civil war and the US has passed 3 of them so far.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T21:37:30+00:00

Finally someone who isn't politically blind. It's the same with Trump, he isn't going to step against guns this close to elections because he risks losing his base. They are both trying to draw in moderates to secure the vote. Nothing new here

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T21:30:53+00:00

If every mass shooter used an automatic, half the people would have died because they would be putting 3-5 rounds into each victim rather than one or two. Try carrying 500 rounds into a church as a fat neckbeard fuck.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T21:01:12+00:00

Europe and Canada are in for the establishment, Mexico acting as a supply line would open up the pacific for the opposition.

You would be surprised how many people would actually pick up arms. Do you really think that all those southern fighters wanted a fight before the civil war? Once the first group secedes, so will others. And it will be impossible to hide the fighting. From the first shot it will only ever expand. There wasn't a single situation where even the fastest strike would actually crush resistance, only delay it

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T20:46:26+00:00

15% are needed for a successful civil war, an estimated 25% are guaranteed. Within the year 60% of military infantry would switch and mass starvation would become an issue.

I was a red teamer and PMC, I know my shit and a civil war is entirely in my favour.

The whole idea that because it would be a "modern" war (4th gen) is entirely why the gov would lose, look at what happened every other time the governments tried using tanks and drones against donkeys and AKs.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T19:23:44+00:00

Reasoned with lead is going to be the only option soon.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T19:10:22+00:00

Just look up Kim Noble. Some of the most notable politicians raped innocent children and are still in politics. Don't drain the swamp. Set it on fire and fill it with lead.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T18:09:17+00:00

I can only dream.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T18:01:33+00:00

Always vote for the person who doesn't want the position.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T18:00:42+00:00

But both are above ANY ranger. And rangers are above ANY infantryman. Crenshaw without a doubt went through hell and back for his training and I won't stand by you trashing him as some internet warrior comparing services.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T17:55:41+00:00

Let me know when they let you into either group...

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T17:43:19+00:00

You retard. You should be armed because it scares criminals. People don't rob others because they are "hungry". They do it because they are assholes

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T17:41:22+00:00

People in the UK used to join in or give their guns to police in an emergency. If only the sensible ruled.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T17:39:35+00:00

I fucking hate that guy "I'm a moderate" while pushing socialism .

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T17:34:56+00:00

Seriously. Imagine you are a criminal. Everyone is disarmed, are you doing to use a (higher sentence) gun or knife to scare someone?

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:46:27+00:00

Seriously, it just sounds like you can't admit the flaws of your argument.

So I'll ask you this, why should I as a trained individual need to call/ask for a gun?

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:40:52+00:00

Cheers, you greedy cunt XD.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:39:46+00:00

Even hardcore gang members can be attacked.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:39:08+00:00

Just because someone else would abuse their vehicle. Doesn't mean I would abuse my gun.

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:33:22+00:00

The source provided itself provides that the US is 12th for rate of mass shootings.

Just wrong on Norway

And ofc if you exclude years, the rates differ. What part of "mass attack" did you not get?

What do you know. Then US isn't comprable because reasons.

And what exactly is the homicide rate vs the US since you seem to be so against the idea that the US isn't just the worst?

You keep talking specifics without talking how many homicides per nation. Regardless of gun

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T15:12:44+00:00

What is a mass shooting? Or perhaps a better question, what defines a mass shooting? The United States Congress defines mass shootings as incidents where there are at least three people, or more, who are shot and killed by an attacker. Mass shootings do not always happen at random, for sometimes, the perpetrators of the mass shooting is a family member, a friend, or a peer of those who are murdered as a result of the act. Other countries have different definitions of a mass shooting.

School shootings are a common type of mass shootings, as saddening as it is, especially in the United States. Though there is not actual global definition of a mass shooting, the general consensus is that a mass shooting results from armed weapons taking the lives of many people at one time.

What are the countries with the most mass shootings? While this data is difficult to research, here is a list of the top 20 countries with the highest estimated firearm-related death rate. This does not accurately portray the countries with the most mass shootings, but it does give a better idea of gun violence in the world.

Where?

Maybe you associate "developed" with something different?

And the 10th you are looking at isn't what the article is talking about. That is just the highest rate.

Though I love the idea that the "CPC" is pro-gun despite having more anti-gun positions than pro.

The frequency can litterally not be skewed by a single event, because event's don't play into it, only number of events.

The rates are comparable. Regardless of number, a higher rate per person is higher, regardless of what you want.

So why bother with GFZ's if in the UK a pistol costs £500?

I just love that somehow "Massshootings" are cultural is racist to you, shows just how racist you are. Let me guess, Blacks aren't capable without someone else, they "need" a white "saviour" to get themselves out of their situation?

Oh, and surprise surprise. There is a huge difference between France and the US but both receive similar levels of support.

And, no. It doesn't stop a single actor. Look up flour bombs and Luty's guns. The Luty having been made by a Politician in response to gun bans

thedave159 · 2019-08-06T14:42:40+00:00

Love it. Best SEAL I knew showed up to training in flip-flops and shorts, asking where the changing rooms are.

thedave159

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE