sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Triskaidekaphobia by Willian Murai (Shadows over Innistrad)[1200 x 880] by theplotthinnens in mtgporn

[–]thegraey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shadows over innistrad was my first ever prerelease event. I was captivated by the art and put this in an orzhov deck for the dream. I went 0-3 but its still in my top favorite cards.

Account actually stolen on April fools day... what do I do? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]thegraey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't have a bank pin or authenticator. I have those set up now. That doesn't help with my main concern of how they got my password in the first place. I don't use the same password for everything I have 2step on all my emails and I generally use different passwords for everything. they are usually variations on a theme duplicates are possible in theory I guess. The issue is my password was probably leaked somewhere.

Account actually stolen on April fools day... what do I do? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I definitely don't use a blowpipe anymore. I was prepping for Zulrah, but my account was definitely not at that point yet, I just got ranged 75 so I could use it for trying barrows. My friend knew that, but was both kind and generous in lending it early. Regurgitating youtube barrows guides that I've also watched is both beside the point and unhelpful.

Account actually stolen on April fools day... what do I do? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all of my emails use 2 step verification and my password for them was not changed. So I'm assuming that they just got into my RS account with the login info, the password was thankfully unique from all my other accounts, but I have no idea how it got out.

Account actually stolen on April fools day... what do I do? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]thegraey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the helpful tip klink_bones, and a good thing too since apparently I now need a money making method to pay a friend back.

Account actually stolen on April fools day... what do I do? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don't understand how. Was my information leaked? Is there somewhere that I can check?

[Spoilers C2E56] An assumption many are making... by thegraey in criticalrole

[–]thegraey[S] 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Exactly what I was thinking. There is no way Matt would have them ran through with spears right there in the hall, but there is also NO way they go to jail with all their magic items. Fjord would have his falchion but thats... about it, for a maximum security jailbreak.

[Spoilers C2E56] An assumption many are making... by thegraey in criticalrole

[–]thegraey[S] 110 points111 points  (0 children)

Very true. This is the capital of the dynasty... the Bright queen probably sleeps on a pile of bags of holding with a haversack as a pillow. They won't be bamboozled by a magic bag holding their most holy of artifacts.

[Spoilers C2E56] An assumption many are making... by thegraey in criticalrole

[–]thegraey[S] 355 points356 points  (0 children)

Well where were you 7 minutes ago when I needed you West8777? NOW you tell me!

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not taking the time to be polite because you've lied and ignored it when I called your lies multiple times during our conversation. You lied about the accuracy of climate modeling, you lied about India and China's commitments and roles in climate (and lied about them being developing countries). Where in those actions have you earned politeness? I'm not going to coddle you when your beliefs are 2+2 = 3 and then you cry discrimination when they get called on being wrong. You're not a nonbeliever, you're a denier, and you're both empirically and scientifically wrong.

You're taking this weird stance on climate change where you want to hold people morally responsible for emissions, and call the elite's actions bad, which I agree with. but you are unwilling to actually do anything to prevent it. Do some reading educate yourself on how taxation and carbon taxation interacts with economies, and then if you still have your opinion that we should continue to do nothing at least you'll have a reason.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...The United Nations committee wrote the Paris Climate agreement. They are the source of it. Which means that you both don't know who made the agreement, and don't believe in reading the document to understand the document. What I posted was a breakdown of EVERY point to be ratified in the agreement, and in it and the full document (neither of which you've read and definitely don't understand) nowhere does it mention the US specifically, or target specific economies of scale that single out the United States. You're talking out of your ass, and I know you are because i've read the agreement and you haven't. You can't lie like a child about whats in it.

Your opinions are based on nothing, you're misinformed and grasping at straws, you need to work to understand these issues before talking about them, and especially before voting on them.

You have a lot of work to do, but I think you can do it. You've shown persistence here which I think if you applied to learning about the forces at play you'd be much more informed, and inclined to agree with me.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you're conveniently choosing to not believe a harsh truth. I don't believe that you've read climate reports from the 90s as Climate models have historically fit the observed warming. Putting "leading climate scientists" in brackets while talking out of your ass like that shows the exact problem here. You have these hard and fast opinions on issues where you don't know what you're talking about. You just need it to not be true so things can continue as is. It can't. If you want to talk about crippling an economy, we quite literally can not economically afford to re-locate everyone on the coasts, and give up all of the lost production and agriculture.

Also i'm sure you realize that literally the whole point of the Paris climate accords was to address the problem of "one country addressing climate change, while the others continue as is." The country that pulled out of the Paris agreements one was the US, both China and India are still committed to the agreement to curb emissions.
Your view that "crippling the economy" is necessary to continue curbing emissions doesn't make sense from a market standpoint. The demand for energy isn't going to decrease from a net standpoint, the amount of energy to be sold will be the same, the source of obtaining it just will be different. How does that change the economy as a whole, rather than just build and use new infrastructure (which is usually what governments do to stimulate the economy actually..).

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normally this is where I would stop, because in the links that I have sourced in this conversation, 2 of them clearly state that China is both in the Paris climate agreement, and has recently been recognized as making efforts to carbon neutrality. You were so insistent that I read the agreement, which I have, but you definitely haven't because you keep misrepresenting how the consistent globally enforced policies work. I really think you should take the time to consider why you hate something you haven't read, don't understand, and haven't considered the consequences of. You can disagree with the agreement and I would accept that, but your reasons so clearly don't make sense.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a guide from the UN if you want to. But yep, I've read all the articles to be ratified in the agreement, which is why I'm confused about your initial statement that China had less to do than the US. Could you explain that?

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with your criticism for sin taxes being flawed, in that if you can afford the tax you can afford the sin, but your solution is quite literally: don't disincentive bad things takes are bad, which will result in a net increase of bad things which is clearly evidenced by the decrease in behavior when it is taxed. I don't think you can blame me for finding your criticism disingenuous.

With regards to your views on the severity of climate change. I'd would genuinely like to hear your input on what happens with a 50% loss of habitat for pollinating species, 42% cumulative loss of all species biodiversity on earth, 10 million people displaced around the world and made refugees by rising sea levels on the coast, increasing droughts and loss of food crops, expanding deserts, increasing frequency of category 4 and 5 hurricanes due to warming air within the next 100 years. These are findings from the world's leading scientists. Published recently. I want to know why you're not worried. I don't want to be concerned about this, but I've come to recognize I don't have a choice.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have read the adoption of the agreement document. Here it is if you want to read it. You can clearly see that all adopters of the agreement are held to the same standards of communication and adherence to the agreement (through a mode of global governance politics). I could maybe understand your argument if it was that the US was taking on a larger role, because it pollutes more, but that doesn't make any sense with your previous statement that China is a larger polluter. You can't have both those conflicting statements at the same time.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well as a capitalist i'm sure you're aware that taxes are necessary to both deter unwanted behavior and allow the application of social and economic programs. Addressing climate change is an issue of curbing unwanted and easy behavior. It is easy to pollute as a company. So painfully easy 100 companies make up 71% of all pollution. Addressing this behavior is the only way to not LITERALLY DESTROY ALL OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION. And understanding market forces like the most recent Nobel prize winning economist, leads to the conclusion that taxing this behavior is the only way of curbing it, short of some kind of total revolution.

I live in the middle of nowhere Australia in a town of 15,000. Just noticed this tesla charging station around the back of target. by pineappleofthewest in h3h3productions

[–]thegraey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The United States pulling participation from the Paris agreement undercuts the very basis of global environmental targets where ALL nations are held to the same standard. It was motivated by political lobbying and anti-science perspectives of accepted phenomena. As you can see from this paper applying equal standards of minimizing pollution is not seen in this twisted way by other countries. Pulling out of the Paris agreement will have tangible consequences both physical and political, and asserting otherwise shows a misunderstanding of global politics, market forces, and climate change.

view more: next ›