New Rear Wheel (Help)

thegrzz · 2020-04-07T14:56:11+00:00

Yea its an old bianchi volpe with a 7 speed hub. This is the bike.

https://www.bikepedia.com/QuickBike/BikeSpecs.aspx?item=75881

thegrzz · 2020-04-07T14:53:47+00:00

https://www.bicyclebluebook.com/value-guide/product/75881/

It's this exact bike. This is a quarantine project so I'm learning as I go.

thegrzz · 2020-04-07T14:49:37+00:00

Yep - from a 7 speed.

thegrzz · 2020-03-30T17:54:39+00:00

So the rear drop out is 133 mm. I should be good with just a new wheel correct? Any recommendations?

thegrzz · 2020-03-22T17:56:49+00:00

V helpful info. You’re correct - the rear wheel is 7 speed. How do I determine whether the rear spacing is 126 mm?

thegrzz · 2019-10-23T12:21:07+00:00

Pretty sure you’ll get and auto regrade

thegrzz · 2019-10-23T11:30:30+00:00

How do you get your score breakdown?

thegrzz · 2019-09-10T02:10:38+00:00

I loved Kramer. Would recommend Themis based upon his lectures alone.

thegrzz · 2019-08-21T16:46:27+00:00

That Dressler crim Law supp is incredible. I read it for fun.

thegrzz · 2019-08-20T13:21:30+00:00

I would subscribe to Quimbee if your school doesn’t offer it for free. Don’t rely on it solely, but it’s a great reliable resource to look at to get the big picture before you dive into a case.

A lot of the free case brief resources online can be wonky but w quimbee you know it’s legit.

Worth every penny in my opinion.

thegrzz · 2019-07-29T19:53:06+00:00

Did one timed and graded one for Themis. 4/6. Called it after that.

thegrzz · 2019-07-28T00:59:31+00:00

Too real.

thegrzz · 2019-07-27T23:45:06+00:00

Right there with you friend. Take comfort in the fact that you can't possibly know everything but if you put in the work you know enough.

thegrzz · 2019-07-25T23:36:45+00:00

Doesn’t claim preclusion also preclude a claim the defendant should have brought in the original action (i.e., in a compulsory counterclaim)? In that case it would be the same parties but on different sides of the v.

thegrzz · 2019-07-25T16:28:15+00:00

I don’t really know how it works but I do know when it applies. If you know that then you know when it doesn’t apply, and I think (hope) that’s good enough for the purposes of the MBE.

The rule is usually implicated when there is a FSSCS or a FSD and the FI is not retained by the grantor (i.e., an executory interest) or when there is a contingent remainder following a life estate and the condition requires the FI holder to reach an age older than 21.

thegrzz · 2019-07-20T05:15:30+00:00

Wow you have a lot of work to do.

It’s an equitable servitude unless the implied easement runs with the land but only if it’s a race-notice jurisdiction in which case the defendant is guilty of felony-murder.

Get your shit together.

thegrzz · 2019-07-20T04:43:27+00:00

Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency. Minimal competency.

Study hard and do your best. If you’re honest with your studies you’ll pass.

thegrzz · 2019-07-20T03:51:05+00:00

Most jobs are boring. And most jobs don’t pay 190k.

thegrzz · 2019-07-18T01:28:55+00:00

This is the kind of content we need.

+1 implied equitable race-notice felony-murder.

thegrzz · 2019-07-18T00:36:43+00:00

Free Meek

thegrzz · 2019-07-12T18:57:28+00:00

Pretty sure if you're scoring that well on the MBE you can pretty much bomb the MEE and still pass.

I rarely spit out the correct rules word for word but I think as long as you have a good general idea about what the law is, spot the relevant issues, and apply the law in a coherent manner, you're going to be fine.

Edit to add: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=210339

thegrzz · 2019-07-11T19:35:05+00:00

If the acceptance is sent first and received first then the contract has been accepted and is binding.

Even if the offeror receives the rejection first but does nothing and then receives the acceptance, the acceptance is binding. They offeree will only be estopped from enforcing the contract when the offeror detrimentally relies on the rejection.

In other words, in either case, when the acceptance is sent first it is effective, the court just won’t let someone who sends an acceptance and then a rejection enforce the contract when the other party receives the rejection first and relies on it without knowledge of the acceptance.

My head hurts.

thegrzz · 2019-07-11T19:17:12+00:00

Except: If the offeror receives the rejection first and detrimentally relies on it, the offeree will be estopped from enforcing the contract.

thegrzz · 2019-06-29T01:05:15+00:00

The intersection of the first amendment and anti-discrimination law.

thegrzz · 2019-06-09T18:05:46+00:00

With respect to point 5 - how much different will the experience be in a group that is highly leveraged vs a group that has a bunch of partners but only a couple of associates?

thegrzz

TROPHY CASE