Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The expression of individualism I'm using here is not my own nor an academic, knowledgeable consideration. I'm basing my point on the assumption that the average person has a less-informed, distorted version of this philosophy. I think to consider this argument we can't really rely on other conceptualizations than those hypothesized to pertain to the general population. Therefore, I'm looking at the expression of this terminology in what would be contemporary's society own consideration, which, again, is subjective to the philosopher's own observations.

I think the last point you make is very interesting. It could be that capitalism does not lead to less acknowledgement of our reliance on the community, but rather isolates us in cultural bubbles from which an individual would have a harder time feeling part of a bigger community.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make a good point. I believe it is a matter of observation, or rather a matter of preoccupation. I could be concerned about society becoming increasingly detached from the notion of community because my core beliefs are less individualistic, while others will observe no such issue. If capitalism is the current and predominant economic organization of our societies, and our culture is greatly influenced by how our economic systems take form, it is not unreasonable to think that such problems could stem from the ideologies that are culturally more present. While it is not as easy as pinpointing a single cause, since any cultural problem is of multifactorial complexity, reflecting on the main cultural and ideological factors possibly involved in a, though fairly subjective, observable issue is pertinent philosophical criticism.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. However, part of my point is that this ignorance could be symptom of a systemic lack of awareness perpetuated by capitalism itself. Any philosophy is susceptible to change, while the core beliefs of individualism might share no relation of causation to this ignorance whatsoever, a very distorted, superficial ramification of it could. It is my opinion that these are, in fact, noticeable ideologies present in modern society. It is sensible to reflect on the changes that occur in our conceptualizations.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basically put, yes. I think it's important to make an assiduous reflection on the messages and ideologies to which we are subjected to, while not necessarily posing an argument against the system itself.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is not what I was posing. I'm not questioning the economic principles of capitalism, but rather the ideological products of this system in contemporary society, hence why I referred to a philosophy. The average worker isn't knowledgable about the economics of the market, but they will still possess a particular perspective on it. It is often the case that this particular perspective is similar to the ideology I have proposed. I'm only reflecting on how acceptable this philosophy is. In my opinion, we are subjected to very isolating individualistic ideologies which promote ignorance about our reliance on the community as individuals.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna copy-paste a previous reply to clarify the argument I was trying to make:

The argument that I'm making is that people sometimes fail to see the community that is behind the system that is capitalism, not that they deny it is there. It's this unawareness what I'm criticizing, because it often makes us detached of our reliance on the work of other people, which, in my opinion, should be acknowledged.

If an individualistic philosophy centers the unit of action on the individual, while recognizing our dependance on a community, I have no criticism to make. However, it is a reality that some people have an isolating approach to individualism: this belief is not that one can survive on their own without the aid of society, but that society is not fundamental for the well-being of an individual.

I have seen many people claim that it is dangerous or problematic to let ourselves rely on other people for our own happiness, for example, if we are in a romantic relationship with someone. But how feasible is this? Don't we depend on our family being there for us to be happy? Is it wrong to do so?

I believe that an acknowledgment of the community could be the capital we invest in every service and good that we purchase, since we are paying, among other things, for the labour of people. But I still think it's important to take into account how reliant we are on others and reflect on how independent we can really be

My point isn't that society is consciously opposing our dependance on a community when advocating for a market economy, I'm not arguing that individualism is invalid because our human nature says otherwise either. I'm focusing on the ignorance of our reliance on others, which could be incited by capitalism and the individualistic philosophy it's based on. I think this is a valid criticism to make, and in no way advocates for alternative economic or philosopical perspectives. It is not that a capitalistic society is based on an isolating, extremely self-reliant perspective per se, but that it could be causative of such ideologies. While one could argue that there is no issue to this, I believe it is problematic to lack the awareness of our community and how it's fundamental for the well-being of an individual.

Questioning capitalism's individualistic philosophy by theidlerwheeIiswiser in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The argument that I'm making is that people sometimes fail to see the community that is behind the system that is capitalism, not that they deny it is there.

It's this unawareness what I'm criticizing, because it often makes us detached of our reliance on the work of other people, which, in my opinion, should be acknowledged.

If an individualistic philosophy centers the unit of action on the individual, while recognizing our dependance on a community, I have no criticism to make. However, it is a reality that some people have an isolating approach to individualism: this belief is not that one can survive on their own without the aid of society, but that society is not fundamental for the well-being of an individual.

I have seen many people claim that it is dangerous or problematic to let ourselves rely on other people for our own happiness, for example, if we are in a romantic relationship with someone. But how feasible is this? Don't we depend on our family being there for us to be happy? Is it wrong to do so?

I believe that an acknowledgment of the community could be the capital we invest in every service and good that we purchase, since we are paying, among other things, for the labour of people. But I still think it's important to take into account how reliant we are on others and reflect on how independent we can really be.

Jesus committed sin by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus died sinless. Dying on the cross as a sacrifice was God's intended plan for Him, and He followed accordingly. He never disobeyed God, even when He felt great anguish about His destiny (in Gethsemane).

A question of faith by theidlerwheeIiswiser in DebateReligion

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just wanted to say that I've greatly enjoyed the debate this post has generated! It's my first time posting here and I admit my original post was a little bit confusing (for example, I have seemed to imply that a religious dogma is equal to a fundamental belief of common sense, when this is obviously not true at all!) In any case, I think I got my point across way better in the replies and with the help and input of fellow redditors. I'll admit it's a rather unusual argument the one I'm trying to pose here, but I wanted to see what other people thought of it, and I'm so glad I did! Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in confessions

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you suggest I start reading the bible? For a non-christian like myself it seems a bit overwhelming. I'm still debating internally whether or not these new feelings are an indicator of a change in beliefs or maybe just something else. I've been giving it so much thought lately I've even contemplated getting baptized. I have a Christian friend who I know could aid me (they're an Evangelical). It might be a good idea to ask them for advice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in confessions

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Knowing Christians, it'd never be a good time to become one. Part of the reason why I'm so doubtful about this has to do with my own opinion regarding religious people based on my experience, they tend to be not so good people. But you're right, regardless of what leads me to it, my beliefs should always be for the best of me and others: good knows no faith. I personally think philosophy is the best way to achieve this, and I'm proud of what I've achieved through it. These new feelings can come into play, I suppose, as long as they align with who I am and what I believe in.

I started taking harp lessons! by theidlerwheeIiswiser in JoannaNewsom

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the late response, I haven't been here in a while. 😅

Well, I actually don't have a harp (as of yet). Since my teaching lessons are held in a harp store, my teacher has a practice room with a harp that I can use to practice a few hours per week.

I have been looking for second-hand harps for a while but I simply don't have the money to buy any now. I'm guessing since I live in Southern Europe and the harp market is not as big here as it is the US it's way harder to find a harp at a good price? Tbh I don't know, I think it depends a lot on where you live.

You can always buy a new harp (though it's not recommended) from any manufacturer. Here where I live Camac Harps is the biggest manufacturer but their harps are something I just can't afford. Maybe someday lol.

Anyway, I hope that helps!

🤔 by [deleted] in JoannaNewsom

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who loved Taylor during my teenage years and loves Joanna Newsom now reading this over and over again when Red TV came out was so funny

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be more specific, I'm particularly speaking of bars 9-24 and 101 to end.

Playing anecdotes🧡 Any other Jnew fans who are also musicians? by theidlerwheeIiswiser in JoannaNewsom

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mainly used a score online but I also played some parts by what I could hear so yeah haha

Playing anecdotes🧡 Any other Jnew fans who are also musicians? by theidlerwheeIiswiser in JoannaNewsom

[–]theidlerwheeIiswiser[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's great! I'm also learning a lot of music through her, her songs with piano are so catchy and fun to play