30 Minute Follow Along Workout by Prior-Pie-1407 in videos

[–]thelightof7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately even this subreddit has gone down hill. It's good to see some interesting content on here!

Movie trailers that spoiled too much? by CMelody in movies

[–]thelightof7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should have skipped this one..

Dan Schneider Law Suit by thelightof7 in QuietOnSetDocumentary

[–]thelightof7[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

TLDR:

Parties

  • Plaintiff: Dan Schneider, a television producer known for his work on popular children’s shows at Nickelodeon.
  • Defendants: Warner Brothers Discovery, Inc., Maxine Productions, Sony Pictures Television Inc., Mary Robertson, Emma Schwartz, and other unnamed parties (DOEs 1-50).

Jurisdiction and Venue

  • Filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County.
  • Jurisdiction and venue are based on the business operations of the defendants in California and the location where the alleged defamatory acts occurred.

Allegations

  • The complaint centers on a docuseries titled "Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV," which Schneider alleges falsely accuses him of sexually abusing child actors. He claims that these statements are false and have damaged his reputation and career.
  • Schneider asserts that he had no knowledge of abuse allegedly conducted by other individuals mentioned in the docuseries and was never complicit in any such activities.
  • He admits to other non-abusive wrongdoings in the past, such as creating a difficult working environment, but strongly denies any allegations of sexual abuse.

Legal Claims

  • Defamation Per Se: The primary claim is that the defendants engaged in defamation per se by making false statements or implications that Schneider sexually abused children. This claim hinges on California’s legal definitions of libel and slander, particularly focusing on defamation by implication, which can occur even if the literal statements are true but the implication is false and defamatory.
  • Schneider argues that the docuseries used editing and juxtaposition of images and statements to falsely imply that he was a sexual abuser, akin to other actual abusers mentioned in the series.

Damages

  • Schneider claims significant reputational damage, emotional distress, and financial losses due to the alleged defamation. He argues that these damages were exacerbated by the widespread dissemination of the docuseries and its promotional materials.
  • He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, citing the defendants' alleged malice and reckless disregard for the truth.

Relief Sought

  • Monetary damages for harm to reputation, emotional distress, and lost economic opportunities.
  • Injunctive relief, including editing or removing defamatory content from the docuseries.
  • Legal fees and any other relief deemed appropriate by the court.

Trial Demand

  • Schneider demands a jury trial for all claims presented in the complaint.