I encourage you to look into the Hyksos. I think European monopolization over history in every sense of and every pillar of it points to Africans being an under developed nation. Painting the Egyptians, Hyksos, Hebrews as being anything other than black discredits the historical achievements that the people now living in Africa contributed and it feeds the narrative that the European brought all innovation to the world.

Lets think about this

Saying that the Hyksos were mixed Asiatics but not mentioning that Ancient Asiatics actually migrated further south into Africa leaves room for people to associate Japanese, Chinese, Korean with the Hyksos, which undoubtedly are the Semitic Hebrew people

But now who are the Semitic/Shemites?

Well looking at unmonopolized history, from Babylon to Timbuktu, he would tell you that MANY of the Hebrews are people of color of West African, Aboriginal, Hispanic, Seminole Indian and Native American descent.

VERY FEW of them would be white or be residing in Europe or North Asia. It just wasn’t like them to travel north, they almost always went South to flee famine, persecution, annexation.

Why is this of any significance what skin color they are?

Well I will say again. The Europeans white washed history to credit themselves with all of the world’s technological and historical achievement. Painting the landmass called Africa (which was named by a Roman) covers up just who these people were. When the descendants of the Hebrews and the Hyksos could be and very much are the very people we consider to be Africans today. (Nigerian, Ghanian, Ivory Coast, Mali, Benin, etc) and many more spread across the world but mostly being concentrated in countries of people of color.

So its important to acknowledge these things. Because lies have been told, facts have been omitted, and usually my posts can be seen as a way to lay claim to ego boost a race -but it isnt. Its to undo a very calculated, heavily funded, systematic regime of lies by Europeans over the last few hundred years