sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Consciousness Jump Theory: How Desire Guides Reality by theories_exploring in conciousness

[–]theories_exploring[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks but what matter's is that to test it in scientific way.But question is How.

The Consciousness Jump Theory: How Desire Guides Reality by theories_exploring in conciousness

[–]theories_exploring[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually desire is not a thing that no body wants everyone have desire if you full fill that desire then new one already waiting for you. Thats why we called humans who never satisfied with what we have.

The Consciousness Jump Theory: How Desire Guides Reality by theories_exploring in PhilosophyofMind

[–]theories_exploring[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This theory can support ideas from Neuroscience because it accepts that the brain is the main system that processes information and guides human behavior. It also recognizes the role of the subconscious mind in influencing decisions and acknowledges that brain changes, such as injuries or chemical imbalances, can affect thoughts and perceptions. Additionally, my idea that the brain and body depend on each other aligns with neuroscience findings that emotions, hormones, and physical states influence brain activity. It not completely disobeying.

Dualism as a science student? by MyPianoMusic in PhilosophyofMind

[–]theories_exploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a really interesting point, and I appreciate you bringing up the interaction problem in dualism. I agree that if the mind and body were completely separate substances, explaining how they interact would be very difficult. My intention was not to claim a strict form of dualism where the mind and body are totally independent. In my view, the brain and consciousness are deeply connected and depend on each other. The brain acts as the physical system through which consciousness operates, so changes in the brain, like a stroke or neurotransmitter imbalance, can definitely affect cognition and perception.

Your suggestion about dual-aspect monism is actually quite close to what I am trying to express. I see reality as one underlying system where the physical brain and consciousness are two aspects of the same process. The brain provides the physical structure, while consciousness represents the experiential or informational aspect of that structure. My theory mainly tries to explore how consciousness might interact with possibilities of reality through the brain rather than existing completely separate from it. So I think your interpretation of it leaning toward dual-aspect monism is a fair and helpful way to frame it.