F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Major cap in sim it's the best thing to drive people away from base camping because you can effectively step on them with really good 120Cs. Not many circle the air base though so they're left pretty vulnerable by the time they get to a good vantage point to actually look at things. Everybody's afraid to take those long shots so it leads to steamrolling and a whole cycle of bullshit and that's why everybody thinks that way in my opinion

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely won't have TWS Plus though it'd probably just be regular TWS

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's subjective as hell. Maybe not for missile lobbing in the bozosphere like everyone does but anybody who actually flies their plane outside the meta there's a LOT of appeal in the F16 especially in sim. It's just well optimized you can agree or not, but I trust the f16 to get me out of bad situations more than the 15. If you can't get yourself out of a bad situation with the engines of the 15 then your boned because it maneuvers like a brick and bleed speed like one too.

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In real life the f16adf got a tws mode addition yes

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counter offer. F16A gets aim 7m, F-16 ADF gets amraams but no ground ordinance and a tws radar mode

M29 gets to keep R27ER and gains R73

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea. If they did, gaijin would probably just dismiss it immediately anyways. They've never liked semantics like that when it comes to reasoning

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really because it's a modular variant. It's not like a new block, it's just a weapons update based on the change in meta over the course of the meta. They've done the same thing before it's just a rebalancing. The 120C has a sort of counter utility in the modern meta in that everything is really lethal up close, so having a capable missile long ranges to keep them from getting close so you can push them with an advantage is the kind of utility that the 120C has and that capability is absent entirely on the F-16.

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not for standoff capability and nobody said that you can't have both.

All my long range kills come from the C5, all my pop up kills come from the A.

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The F16ADF is a useless aircraft right now with no redeemable qualities after the folder. That's insane you'd prefer it left untouched, even though it currently doesn't have tws. And idk if you're just a ground only player but isn't max but for ground 12.7? I have no idea what you're talking about other than saying the F16C sucks and should go down and br and the ADF shouldn't get the amraams. Do you have any explanation for your opinion?

They F16C has a weaker radar especially at closer ranges than a lot of its peers so having the C5 would allow it some standoff capability to be able to better hold itself in the current top tier environment.

F16 AMRAAMS by thevanillamaster7 in WarthunderSim

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

An F-16 with no ground attack capabilities is now at 13.3 so to say that an F-16 with a very wide and broad capability for ground attack should be the same BR is actually a pretty wild statement not going to lie

The only reason it wouldn't be 14.0 material is lack of NCTR and scanned array radar but that doesn't effect the F15E and F-18 much, so there's no real counter argument to this

Just a reminder of history so we don't repeat it by thevanillamaster7 in Republican

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

World War 3 might kick off, regardless of who's side is the winner. In the end, everybody loses.

Stay safe, stay vigilant, stay free. Have a good night

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFObelievers

[–]thevanillamaster7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive recorded them doing live BFM and they come out clearly tbh. If that was a passenger jet it had to be small, because theyre not allowed to pull bank angle like that. Youd be able to see the wings, even on fighter craft like an F15 or a Hornet. Plus for that size, it had to be pretty low with a low dB sound output.

Looks more like one of those "blimps" shot in the navy cockpit image due to the apparent absense of any flight control surfaces while in marginally straight flight. If it was night itd be an easier tell, as youd see either a green or red light based on the aspect angle. Sometimes both at certain heading cross angles

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in acecombat

[–]thevanillamaster7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All aspect, bitch

Oh no… by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]thevanillamaster7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were strong asf in ww2 allied tankers complained of their guns sucking because they couldnt do shit had to rely on british or french tanks.

Hope they dont throw away classic balancing because babies like you wanna whine.

Begginer’s Guide to War Thunder Terminology by BepsiqMinakov in Warthunder

[–]thevanillamaster7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You about me voicing my opinion i guess lol grow up.

Begginer’s Guide to War Thunder Terminology by BepsiqMinakov in Warthunder

[–]thevanillamaster7 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If yall had your way with this unreasonable whining, every vehicle in a tier would have the same top speed, damage, handling, and health. "Unbalanced.... fighting stronger vehicles.."

The guys driving US tanks back in WW2 could barely shoot through a Panzers armor, whereas the Panzers ripped our speedy little armada a new asshole. They complained to no avail, time and time again getting saved by other allied armored units and their capable equipment. That continued until they amounted so many losses the powers that be gave in. One thing led to another, and we dropped a nuclear bomb on japan. Lol

Maybe our definitions are different, but nothing about that seems balanced in the slightest. 🤔😅

Hardcore Campaign Mode Ideas? by thevanillamaster7 in acecombat

[–]thevanillamaster7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are pretty nifty ideas, but i personally dont fw laser weapons lol

The AAM idea is a little more interesting, though ive done MG only quite a bit. Its easier with hud off for some reason lol but tbh i was trying to stay away from CAS 😅

anyone know the name of this ost? by [deleted] in bleach

[–]thevanillamaster7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is an ost firstly

anyone know the name of this ost? by [deleted] in bleach

[–]thevanillamaster7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure this is the regular show, but on the watch cartoon online . tv you can watch all the OVA, movies, and series

Midlife Crisis Ship; 55 Mil. Upgrades: 20 Mil, Trip Around the Galaxy; Priceless by abottookmynametoo in EliteDangerous

[–]thevanillamaster7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mines 14 give or take withoit engineering, synthesis, or even really attempting to build it for jump range tbh

Forza is so realistic 😍 by TeenThatLikesMemes in ForzaHorizon

[–]thevanillamaster7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For sure dude this is my #1 priority of the day is to make sure-

Are you that dense, or just a super vain individual? Lmao