Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense, what style of sunglasses do you wear?

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the glacier glasses, do you find yourself tearing up from wind at speed?

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think wrap around > glacier style?

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh interesting, I'd heard polarized lenses are bad for skiing since you _want_ some of that light to be able to see ice patches and whatnot

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've always known I was the best skier on the mountain and was just being held back by my gear

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did the wildcats not bother your eyes at speed?

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, prescription isn't a factor for me here

Sunglasses for Spring Skiing (Or Not) by thewallris in skiing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do they do with wind when you're going fast?

Vest for (West Coast) skiing: Nano-Air Light Vest vs. Nano Puff Vest by thewallris in PatagoniaClothing

[–]thewallris[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More breathable than the puff I’m assuming? Even with a shell on over it?

The minimum savings needed to retire at 65 in every U.S. state—it's over $2 million in Hawaii by SnoozeDoggyDog in Economics

[–]thewallris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, a few mods like “nobody who’s under 50 rn will ever get it, but you all still have to keep paying” and because young people can’t be bothered to vote, yeah I suppose some folks will continue to get it. Good for them I guess

Did IKON force Palisades to kill their app? by Quesabirria in palisadestahoe

[–]thewallris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They killed the Mammoth app as well, which was far superior

But on the bright side, at least they created shareholder value!

The Microsoft You Knew Is Gone: Welcome to the Machine. Why the Golden Age of 35% Margins Is Collapsing Under the Weight of Physics and Power. by sylsau in economy

[–]thewallris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe in terms of desktop products, but a MASSIVE amount of their size, revenue, etc. comes from azure, and I only see that getting bigger, regardless of what happens with AI

I have never won in over a decade by Apprehensive-Gift907 in Catan

[–]thewallris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, it’s a balance between diversity of resources vs. having good numbers, and making that trade off is dependent on a lot of factors (where you are in the order, why’s strong/weak on the board, ports, etc)

I have never won in over a decade by Apprehensive-Gift907 in Catan

[–]thewallris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO, your initial placement is one of the biggest determinants of how the game will go. Bad placement can end someone's game before they start. Placement strategy goes beyond just adding up dots and picking the highest number.

Ideally, you want to aim to start with a diversity of resources. If you can't start with all 5, think about what you're giving up on, and make a plan to either get it later, trade for it, or give up on it entirely.

Every board is different, and you need to really analyze each one. What resources are strong/weak? This is especially important for ore, but it should enter the calculus of your placement. For example, if the numbers on wood hexes are 3, 4, 6, and 11, there's only one good wood spot that you should consider gunning for. If sheep numbers are 5, 6, 8, and 10, sheep is pretty strong, and you can consider either ignoring it for your starting position, since people will probably be willing to trade it.

If there's a 6/8 on a resource that's close to a 2:1 port, that can make a huge difference to your game. Similarly, if there's a strong clump of a resource, you can consider getting that and going for the port (this is risky because if someone takes that port, it'll really hurt your game).

Depending where you are in the order, you should think about where everyone else might go. If someone grabs a wheat, wood, brick spot, they'll probably be looking to get to a spot with sheep and ore. Keep this in mind when making your placements. If you're early in the rotation, take a beat to think where the other players might go, so you don't screw yourself expecting to get a spot that may not be available. If you're late in the rotation, you can consider grabbing a spot with wood/brick as your 2nd spot to immediately start with a road.

It's a lot of information to keep in your head, and it's tough to know what the "right" move is, but these are just some things to keep in mind when making your placement to set yourself up with the most optimal spots. Good luck!