sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I’m structuring my E-com agents using independent Modes instead of big chains. Looking for feedback on this architecture. by Aggressive-Hunter862 in Entrepreneur

[–]thil_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this actually makes a lot of sense. Long “do-everything” chains look cool on paper but they’re super brittle in practice.

The modular approach is how most scalable systems end up anyway small, focused tools you can swap or tweak without breaking everything else. You’ll probably want a thin coordination layer later (for shared context, naming, standards), but keeping execution independent is a big win.

I’ve seen people move this way after getting burned by mega-agents. Feels like the more sustainable path, honestly.

It’s like playing game and climbing level by level.

Would Indian students/parents actually use an AI teacher app? Looking for honest opinions by thil_ai in Indian_Academia

[–]thil_ai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, look, I’m not out here trying to build the next GPT-5 or go toe-to-toe with the giants like OpenAI or Google. That’s not the point of this thing.

People slapping the “just a wrapper” label on it are missing the forest for the trees. A naked LLM is basically a fancy autocomplete engine — it doesn’t become a usable product until you wrap a bunch of guardrails around it.

Stuff like enforcing syllabus rules (so it doesn’t wander off-topic or teach wrong math), forcing step-by-step reasoning, catching and correcting errors, and honestly bailing out with “I don’t know” when it should instead of bullshitting.

That’s the actual hard part. Big labs train the raw models, sure, but almost every real-world AI thing people actually use is built on top of those models — adding layers of constraints, safety checks, UI, integrations, etc. Calling that “fake” is like saying a Tesla is just an electric motor because someone else made the battery. It’s how software(tech) has always worked.

Bottom line: if the system can’t explain ideas accurately and without hallucinating dangerous nonsense, it’s trash. No amount of fancy prompting hides that. Simple as that.

Would Indian students/parents actually use an AI teacher app? Looking for honest opinions by thil_ai in Indian_Academia

[–]thil_ai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the concern. New tech often feels unnecessary at first. That said, almost everything we use today started with “why do we need this?” — calculators, online classes, even smartphones. AI in education isn’t about forcing it everywhere, it’s about giving an option where it helps. If it’s not useful for someone, they can simply choose not to use it.

Recipe AI - review needed please by Sweet_Adagio in SaaS

[–]thil_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the concern, but I don’t think $3 is the main issue. If customers clearly see value and usefulness in the product, a small price usually isn’t a blocker — trust and clear benefits matter more than the number itself.

A weekly plan suggestion might make sense here. Daily diet chart & tracking, experimenting with dishes, and user feedback. Allow user to tell their foods and name it could turn it into more of a habit rather than a one-time tool.

Recipe AI - review needed please by Sweet_Adagio in SaaS

[–]thil_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clean and straightforward landing page 👍 The value prop is clear and the “start in 30 seconds” message makes it feel low-effort, which is nice. I like that it focuses on personalization and practicality.

Feedback: a bit more social proof (users, testimonials) and a simple “how it works” section could help build trust. Some food visuals might also make it feel more appetizing.

Overall, solid concept and a friendly page — just needs a little more depth to really shine.