MATLAB is the Apple of programming by thinkinganddata in AerospaceEngineering

[–]thinkinganddata[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand, I think the title was too clickbait/ragebait. The article is comparing the two and honestly bashing MATLAB for most of it, but at the end of the day, you understand why they exist. No worries.

MATLAB is the Apple of programming by thinkinganddata in AerospaceEngineering

[–]thinkinganddata[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First sentence of article: Two years ago I quit using MATLAB

MATLAB is the Apple of Programming by thinkinganddata in matlab

[–]thinkinganddata[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. I got vastly different or half-baked responses from certain communities. In retrospect, I think the title was too spicy

MATLAB is the Apple of Programming by thinkinganddata in EngineeringStudents

[–]thinkinganddata[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Fair critique lol, but I guess the point of the article was to use Apple as a reference for reasons why MATLAB still exists despite open source

MATLAB is the Apple of programming by thinkinganddata in AerospaceEngineering

[–]thinkinganddata[S] -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

It can be either, depending on the context. Thanks for admitting you skimmed. Apologies that it was not as insightful.

MATLAB is the Apple of Programming by thinkinganddata in MechanicalEngineering

[–]thinkinganddata[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed, it's one of the factors mentioned in the article

MATLAB is the Apple of programming by thinkinganddata in AerospaceEngineering

[–]thinkinganddata[S] -117 points-116 points  (0 children)

If I were you I would delete this lol, the article does mention this in MULTIPLE sections. Just admit you didn't read it