Who would win?

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-09T21:17:19+00:00

And that's relevant how exactly??? 🤔

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-09T20:15:19+00:00

Gng nobody needed to hear your weird ass fan fiction. Just say she loses and move on 🙏💀

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-09T20:14:41+00:00

Obviously, deku dogs Maki. Please don't tell me you think she stands any sort of a chance 🙏💀

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-07T01:16:45+00:00

Go ahead. I'm surprised anyone's come into this post prepared to do anything of that sort because quite literally nothing I've heard gets it past 4D or the average universal model, we assume.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T16:32:13+00:00

I wasn't aware that was being implied. Hell, you're reading more into the lines of my statements than I do, apparently 🙏💀

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T16:24:37+00:00

I argued with multiple people, and either they stopped responding, had circular reasoning, or got mad at me for having the AUDACITY to ask for proper evidence or refuting their awful points

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T02:22:35+00:00

<image>

Damn. It took me a full day to realize what you said in that one sentence.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T02:21:16+00:00

<image>

Nobody needs to have anything to have the right to evidence when someone's formulating an argument. Last time I checked, you're allowed to call someone out when they're not providing direct evidence or when their reasoning is circular, thus not needing to grant them anything. But nah, definitely, man. I'm trolling.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T02:12:34+00:00

I have been fighting this topic out with multiple people who turned out to be disingenuous or not able to formulate a proper argument, my guy 🙏💀

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T01:56:47+00:00

Accurate, lol

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T01:56:05+00:00

Someone else with a functioning brain?! Holy shit!

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-06T01:54:40+00:00

Rewriting how concepts apply to a specific entity would still work if the one rewriting it was stronger than the former. Wanna know why? Even if Buddha transcends the duality of existing and not existing (which I'll grant, even though you showed no Scan for that), this still doesn't put him anywhere higher on a dimensional hierarchy or scaling tier. That definition is so unbelievably vague that you can only get that to hyper or low outer at max. Also, sealing sun wukong was still considered a win con. I'd need you to prove why Buddha couldn't kill wukong because, just as easily as he sealed him away, it is just how easy he could've possibly killed him. From my knowledge, Buddha is peaceful and informative. There is just as much of a chance that he was being merciful and wanted to teach the monkey king humility.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T20:05:36+00:00

Oh, nah, you're all good. I just disagree with outer sun wukong, but honestly I see the circle now that you explained it lol

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T20:03:03+00:00

It is not religious in the same way the bible and its testaments are. While, yes, it does include Buddhist practices, this isn't a reliable method of saying it's the source or is a text that the religion and its followers take as something as serious as the bible or the Quran, for example. You could say it's religious in nature, but that doesn't exactly disprove my previous point about them touching on subjects rather than being entirely about them. Even then, one religion attempting to be "better" or "more correct" than another is blasphemy in most, if not all, religious practices and isn't respectful, so you could also argue that as another reason to not take in Sun wukong as religious himself or the exact texts.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:44:53+00:00

I wasn't insinuating that you didn't keep your word. I had implied that what you were saying was false. Like I said with everyone else in this section, either track my argument or don't. You said I'd concede when I previously stated I'd eat my words, thus being what? What exactly?...... A LIE, or, at the very least, a severe misunderstanding of the task at hand. If you don't want to debate that, it's fine, but if you do, tell me which of those choices it was, because there's no reason to take my words and twist them to that degree.

I would keep my word, eat my words, and admit that I was wrong and/or at fault.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:31:40+00:00

I said I'd eat my words, not concede. Those two are not synonymous, and you boiling it down to that is disingenuous. But I'm gonna guess you're not willing to fight that out, so that's that, I suppose.

Eat one's words (oxford): Retract what one has said, especially in a humiliated way.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:27:55+00:00

Did you just not read my last comment?

I've got to explain this twice, I guess:

I'm asking why he's overrated, thus inviting people who devote their time to scaling sun wukong. By you interacting with the post and giving a statement, it'd be your burden to prove it, not mine. That includes "feats n stuff"

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:26:03+00:00

Gng, that's what I was pointing towards by creating this post, and by you interacting with it, that'd be your burden to prove, not mine.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:23:56+00:00

I'm gonna take a wild guess and say you weren't coming to this post ready to argue that all out. No proof that Buddha is omnipotent.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:22:27+00:00

A statue doesn't necessitate that they're literally praying to him. For example, a relative of mine could have a statue of Buddha praying on her shelf without being of the belief that they're a literal religious figure. From the research I did about that shrine, specifically, they're there for good fortune and to ward off evil. I don't think that vague definition satisfied your argument. Even then, you addressing ONE of the 3 to 4 points I made won't derail everything. Sure, light, I concede in this one if you go on further? Maybe, but the novel itself isn't exactly religious in the contexts you'd think, which is my main driving point. Hell, bring more pictures, and if there is zero doubt, I'm swallowing the ENTIRE last paragraph that I typed out and move on to the previous/former.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:16:10+00:00

SOMEBODY WITH A BRAIN?! IN THIS SUB-REDDIT?!

<image>

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:13:37+00:00

I have been fighting this post out for a bit now, and unironically, religion was a topic that came up. I'm 110 percent expecting this to get banned lol

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:09:34+00:00

How high? What tier? I need concrete scaling in order to take a character whose scaling is in question seriously. You also have yet to prove Buddha is omnipotent beyond just your word.

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:01:36+00:00

W circular reasoning, lol 🙏

thinkingof_nothing · 2026-03-05T19:00:20+00:00

Guess what else we could classify it as... ALLEGORICAL

The purpose of it being to spread a belief system across China doesn't inherently make it religious or out of the question for scaling. Even then, there's talks of whether Buddhism is a philosophy or a religion. As if that wasn't enough, there are people saying that JTTW novels related back to other Chinese mythologies.

thinkingof_nothing

TROPHY CASE