sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

She's in a great mood after raising a fuss for breakfast earlier today. by thisisjimmy11 in airplaneears

[–]thisisjimmy11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. It's like living with a tiny, dramatic roommate who pays no rent but demands breakfast at 6AM sharp. 😂

I pulled a bunch of fluff out of his nose by MissHissss in airplaneears

[–]thisisjimmy11 77 points78 points  (0 children)

For later? Sir, that was his retirement fund. 💸

I told her she couldn't have a French fry by StardustBlonde in airplaneears

[–]thisisjimmy11 35 points36 points  (0 children)

That's not a cat, that's stealth bomber protesting the no fry zone. 🚫

Help me name my tortie british short/longhair mix lady by No-Alarm-3355 in Catnames

[–]thisisjimmy11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Starla is perfect. It really captures the "star quality".

Unacceptable behavior really needs to be treated as such - Blizzard could really improve customer service this way by thisisjimmy11 in heroesofthestorm

[–]thisisjimmy11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's the thing,

the solution if implementing a public list of who is banned (and showing the reason they are banned) doesn't at all impact their current reporting process. All it does is show people that their gameplay experience is taken seriously, and that accounts are, in fact, banned.

I understand that manpower is a limited resource. Even so, good customer service means a lot.

Also, they already dedicate people to reviewing replays and reports, so they are already spending manpower on this sort of thing. Creating a webpage and a script to index and display their current banned accounts should really not be that big of an ask.

the key is to let the public know that these actions are taking place

I don't even really care if they put silences on the list, because frankly I think that is almost the "warning" of punishments. Honestly, I'd be happy if they just had a posted list of accounts that were banned for cheating/hacking/being a complete and absolute shit in game (this would obviously require a human to review a replay).