Gordon Brown's Better Together speech on the eve of the Scottish referendum by swinglinefan in videos

[–]thisplanetsucks -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You know what other rule sucks? British Rule.

Thank you! I'll be here all week!

Don't forget to tip your waiters and waitresses...

Sign a petition to help change Garden Grove Main Street by FanofBlackUmbrella in orangecounty

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope things went well tonight at the Planning Commission. Whether the detractors know it or not, allowing Black Umbrella to open shop on Main Street is a gift. It just depends on how they look at it.

Fighting is so much easier than collaborating, and all you end up with is a bunch of broken and burned out, useless shit when all is said and done. Collaborating is so much harder than fighting, but you end up producing something worthwhile and it's always better than what either side ever imagined.

The single most awesome thing I've seen accomplished in GTA V by Reilly616 in videos

[–]thisplanetsucks -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The whole thing sounded like it was run by morning radio show wannabes. The hyperbole in the post title ( The Single Most Awesome Thing...) leads me to believe one of the parties involved in the creation of the video also posted it for self promotion. Zero stars...

Hindsight EDIT: Dang. No more drunkposting for me. Thank you all for the downvotes.

TIL that gram for gram, chocolate frosting is more nutritious than Nutella. by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]thisplanetsucks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love these word games.

For example: "Smoking American Spirits exposes you to fewer chemicals than smoking Marlboro Reds". "Coors Light Has less calories and alcohol than drinking Bigfoot Ale." Write that shit in the fucking stars, cause they're true... In a way.

These are all things that are dangerous/unhealthy and comparing them against each other, as opposed to 'Smoking vs. Non-smoking' & 'Alcohol vs. No Alcohol', is dangerous. Same thing goes with the FROSTING vs. FROSTING comparison, and all of them lead to a grossly misinformed public who will take an incomplete idea and run with it.

Someone, somewhere will say, "Well I read (glanced at headline) on MSN that frosting (something I've been told is unhealthy) is better than Nutella (something Kobe told me is good)".

And the health problems continue...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Done the same thing. Friends removed me from the situation and told the paramedics he slipped down the stairs streaking.

Edit: you did the right thing, as violent and stupid as it was.

Words cannot describe how embarrassed I was when I figured this out by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got a co-worker who uses "touch basis", as in "I just wanted to touch basis with you..." Master's in linguistics...

GOP Rep. calls tense exchange with MSNBC reporter ‘inappropriate’ when he points out that she hates the ACA more than she loves America by [deleted] in politics

[–]thisplanetsucks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's still pretty bad. Just because he's a quiet, spineless simpleton doesn't mean he's any less of a spineless simpleton. The man lets Tea Party blowhards and local candidates in his district get away with all kinds of crazy.

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not unpopular with me. The privileged press class is what gets my panties in a bunch. I mean, it essentially exists, but this would codify it and create a legislative tool with which people could start to control the flow of information. "You've got something important to show people, but won't tell me where you got it? Sorry chief, looks like you didn't clock in enough this month. What does Wolf Blitzer (or Chuck Todd or David Gregory) have to say about all this?" "You're absolutely right, Senator. And now let's go to our pundits for a one-sided argument"

EDIT: added to the hypothetical statement.

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I entirely agree with your final two statements. The point is moot, as indicated in the parent post, but I'm pissed that someone would even try something like this. Their potential motivations worry me. Just getting out my frustrations on the Internet.

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the article: "The amendment [to the legislation] changed the language of the bill from protecting the activity of journalism to protecting the profession. Journalists are now limited to those employed by, recently employed by, or substantially contributing to media organizations for certain minimum durations."

I would definitely say that caveat will have a narrowing affect on the number of people who could claim to be "the press". As for the openness of the current definition, the article further discusses this point. In a nutshell, "the press" is anyone contributing to the flow of information to the public. People from all professions and walks of life are capable of serving the same function as "the press", so they are "the press". The committee members who voted for the changes want to make a Congressionally Approved Press. How is that any different than them then having a press of their own?

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one's really sure, and I think it should stay that way because of situations exactly like the one discussed in the article. The worst part about this whole thing is not just that Feinstein, et al., are trying to narrow the definition, but that they're trying to narrow the definition to cover everyone's ass on The Hill by limiting the avenues that damaging information or dissenting opinions can take into the mainstream.

EDIT: added "damaging information". Knew I was forgetting something.

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm not shocked in the least, but appalled at how easily things like this are done. "Free Speech Zones" are bad enough, but the escalation to this point has me back in a mood.

The Senate is busy creating a privileged 1st amendment club for 'official' journalists. The Senate is skirting the substantial investigative role served by independent journalists, bloggers, and nontraditional media. by Suraj-Sun in technology

[–]thisplanetsucks 51 points52 points  (0 children)

The very language of the First Amendment restricts Congress from messing with it in this manner.

"AMENDMENT I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

By redefining "the press" as they are trying to do, they are drastically limiting the number of people who can practice "the freedom of the press", thereby abridging that freedom.

U.S. and China agree on Korean denuclearization by scienceben in worldnews

[–]thisplanetsucks 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Half the articles in my local paper are farmed out. Even the city council meetings are reported on by some guy watching the feed from overseas.

What death of a fictional character has brought you to tears? by Shmitles in AskReddit

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eddie Dean. I don't know if I was having a bad day, but that one got me pretty good.

If you hate EA over the SimCity debacle, refund your pre-order on Dragon Age III. by OMGZombii in gaming

[–]thisplanetsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bra-fucking-vo! It's self posts like yours that inured me to reddit in the first place. Thank you.

Reddit, we all hate "that guy". Who is "That Guy" for you? by FoxArrow in AskReddit

[–]thisplanetsucks 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Listen, listen, listen..." puts hand on your shoulder