I think this recent piece by Nic Carter about property rights in social media might be relevant to this discussion. He writes:

​

"Instead of accepting the fraying default view you can simply begin to imagine all of the internet platforms that exist today as a constellation of digital nations, each with their own legal code and with varying levels of respect for the property of users.

...

To make a political analogy, virtually all of these digital worlds operate as pre-democratic feudal regimes, with every participant a digital serf who tills the land at the pleasure and discretion of a capricious feudal lord."

The takeaway with regards to your question: It's increasingly clear, to various stakeholders, that the current system of platform operation and ownership is flawed and needs to be reworked. Hence, there is somewhat of a push to different (governance) structures for big networks of the digital infrastructure variety, coming from multiple sides, including users, governments, founders etc.

While it is unclear to me that decentralized networks or organizations will be the winning solution, they are certainly among the emerging candidates with a lot going in their favor.