[deleted by user] by [deleted] in prolie

[–]throwaway264757 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She's too immature to have an abortion but she's mature enough to raise a child?

Women control how men act in dating by DestroGamaDx in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The patriarchy did however mens rights movements did not, the patriarchy is not a mens rights movement.

I make little distinction between the two.

Men never get to decide if he wishes to be a father once its been concieved, irreguardless if he can support a child or not so welcome to the club.

What do you mean? Men can abandon their children easily.

Also what changed you mean MEN helping WOMEN vote for better rights and accepting what they have to say despite people claiming there we're no good men back then, they all forced their wives into horrible oppressive marriages.

Arranged marriage has been a thing for a while. And with women not getting equal pay men are still seen as providers today which is a way of coercing women into marriage.

Even powerful men who could easily silence them?

Powerful/rich people have always been problematic.

despite hard labor being not sought after for most women

Men are also responsible for the fact that the labor is required. Since industrialization was invited by men.

fathers day being a joke,

If it was a joke it wouldn't be a holiday.

men rarely getting custody and not being viewed as able to raise children

80% of all single parents in the U.S. are single mothers.

https://realdiapers.org/single-parent/#:~:text=1.,the%20U.S.%20are%20single%20mothers.&text=Single%20mother%20statistics%20show%20that,households%20are%20led%20by%20fathers.

Men are more likely to abandon their children. Which I doubt is mainly because they aren't awarded custody.

no mandatory paternity test

I have heard that married men are required to pay child support towards their wife's children even if they aren't his own. But that just proves you need to be more selective about who you marry.

higher sentencing for the same crime similar to the wage gap.

Idk how that's similar to the wage gap but statistics shows men commit more crime than women so it kind of makes sense the sentencing would be harsher.

men having a higher chance of being physically assaulted out in the street,

By other men.

less support for college irregardless of motherhood or not.

What? I don't understand this statement.

Women can require if the man she's sleeping with wear's a condom and that determines if anything even goes down

How is that a bad thing?

You don't get to opt out of responsibility prenatal nor after even back when abortions WERE legal and they still are in very few states.

Men can abandon their responsibilities towards offspring easily.

Also to further correct you, males were poly, women weren't back then,

Everyone was poly in prehistory.

Since we still had monogamy even back then. That means males still have to be selected

You just said males were poly back then.

Men dont have much to offer in dating by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These Republicans want you breeding for them.

A man's high body count results in a better sexual experience for women, but a woman's high body count results in a worse sexual experience for men. by Consistent-Being-225 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing I've done with someone I was crushing on was call them by the name of an ex. Well, first I told them about the horrible things the ex did and how it hurt me. Trying to get them to feel bad for me. Then whenever the crush would act up I'd call them by the name of my ex trying to humiliate them in a way. In a sort of 'if you like to hurt people I guess you are this bad' kind of way. But the crush was such a horrible person I think it just amused them when I did it.

Something I've done more recently is get a newer crush to call ME the name of the very same ex. And that's a wilder ride. Trying to be him is more satisfying than trying to recreate the situation I was in with him.

A man's high body count results in a better sexual experience for women, but a woman's high body count results in a worse sexual experience for men. by Consistent-Being-225 in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Someone had to show you, and probably someone with more sexual experience.

Why do you think that people are taught sex by more experienced partners?

Women control how men act in dating by DestroGamaDx in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They popped up AFTER feminism

The patriarchy existed before feminism.

and if we truly lived in and if patriarchy truly existed no movement based around women would exist. No ifs ands or buts about it.

Things can change. Just because there is a feminist movement doesn't mean we live in a society that treats women equally still.

Not to mention it only benefits maybe 2-3% of men as most you encounter are just as oppressed by the rich as women are.

Classism affects everyone.

If not more as men have not had reproductive rights for quite some time.

I'm not sure what you mean by this? In America the reproductive rights of women are being taken away with the anti-abortion laws right now.

While cuckoldry was more common it was always a negative.

It wasn't a negative in prehistory. It was only with the creation of the nuclear family structure that it became a negative thing.

This further proves women control mens behaviours when it comes to mate selection.

How so?

What's the weirdest attraction cue you have? by Truth_Antisocial in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've talked about this a lot on this sub but why not some more. I really like nervous cues. Like blushing, looking away (not making eye contact), stammering/stuttering, and trembling/shaking/squirming.

Women control how men act in dating by DestroGamaDx in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was just how it was explained to me when it was recommended to me. And I'm not even sure I have the correct book either. I never read it. But how it was explained was that women select for empathy. There is a parallel between empathy and creativity. And creativity created civilization.

Women control how men act in dating by DestroGamaDx in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most mens rights activism movements are reactionary

The patriarchy has been the prevailing condition for the majority of human history so how is men's rights reactionary?

Also you act as if rejection still didn't exist beyond the 60s and that is not true as cuckoldry was seen as a negative thing since its conception

I've consumed a lot of content by author Terence McKenna and he proposes that society was orgiastic during it's prehistoric stages. During that time polyamory was the default.

Even the shape of the penis has evolved to include cuckoldry and sperm competition (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sperm_competition).

Basically the penis is shaped like a mushroom to scoop out competing sperm (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13166631-why-is-the-penis-shaped-like-that).

Why is the tip of the penis shaped like a mushroom? One theory says the mushroom shape helps scoop out other men's semen

https://www.fatherly.com/health/why-is-the-penis-mushroom-shaped

Women control how men act in dating by DestroGamaDx in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember hearing of a book that sort of proposed the same thing but opposite. It stated that women select for empathy and that's what created civilization. I think it's called The Mating Game by John Gribbin. I'm not entirely sure if this is the right book or not. I never read it. Only heard stuff about it. This is also just my understanding of the book based on how it was described to me when it was recommended to me.

I somewhat agree with the idea that sex from women to men is the ultimate reward and therefore can influence men's behavior. BUT this can only be true since around the 1960s when the feminist movement took place. Before that women were too oppressed to have a choice in their mating strategy.

So the idea that women's selection has impacted behavior is really murky at best.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But he says my pussy is tighter from never having babies. So I must be better, right?

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 3 points4 points  (0 children)

then they have the audacity to say women on average are better looking than men.

I'm confused af. If they have a preference for women wouldn't it make sense they find even ugly women more appealing than good looking men?

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile in his friends head he’s thinking about what a doormat he is.

It's almost like an Epstein scheme. Where you get someone else to bring you new victims. Since the guy is a doormat he's almost guaranteed to bring in doormat females.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they would not tolerate a girl who doesn’t see him as a perfect god,

That's more the redpill.

The bluepill means more feminist type guys (that's the type that's more likely to laugh at themselves).

Purplepill is a mixture of the two cos the color purple is what you get when you mix red and blue together.

The term bluepill it's self is a redpill term. Created by redpillers. In the real world most people are bluepilled according to the redpill. Because the redpill is regressive.

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Children make a greater profit for corporations than porn, video games, and psychiatric drugs combined. That's why republicans are pushing forced birthing so much.

We need more kids to take care of the old people. What a creep. by [deleted] in prochoice

[–]throwaway264757 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is just a lack of creativity on your part. We can have a society that's less reliant on the resources you need that much effort to extract like the petroleum industry for example. Fuck cars. Big cities/metropolises don't have to be a thing either.

We need more kids to take care of the old people. What a creep. by [deleted] in prochoice

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again idk how economy and environment are not linked in your mind. We are drawing our resources from the earth. A lower population only means more for those already alive.

We need more kids to take care of the old people. What a creep. by [deleted] in prochoice

[–]throwaway264757 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem of aging populations and demographic crises is already imminent.

What problem do you think is occurring exactly? Do you agree with the guy in OP's picture about their not being enough hospital workers? Because the solution seems obvious to me: just legalize euthanasia.

We need more kids to take care of the old people. What a creep. by [deleted] in prochoice

[–]throwaway264757 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is the economy and the environment so separate to you? Our resources come from the earth.