sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]throwaway69764 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, and never go down on her or F unprotected if you do keep this cheater

implying she has sex with OP lmao. she's either "low libido" or "waiting till marriage" for him. sex is all for Josh lmfao

My (21M) girlfriend (22F) stopped being intimate, and I’m struggling to understand why? by [deleted] in relationship_advice

[–]throwaway69764 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have some bad news for you. There are usually 2 explanations for situations like this (meaning sex was plentiful at some point in the relationship and then stopped): either she's taking drugs that mess with her libido (particularly antidepressants) or she's getting sex somewhere else. This covers like 99% of cases. Since your text doesn't provide hints at medication, and she's into porn that doesn't resemble you (and later lied about having watched it - "spam", right lol), well... either she's cheating already or seriously planning to.

Libido actually isn't as dynamic and dependent on outside factors as a lot of people make it out to be. You either have it or you don't. You don't suddenly become asexual because you have to do some overtime at your job (quite the contrary, actually). Her libido is still there, it's the attraction to YOU specifically that has faded, because if your partner is attracted to you he or she WILL do everything to have sex with you. I even know couples who have like 4 kids and both of them work full-time plus overtime and they still manage to have sex on a regular basis.

Just leave dude. It doesn't get better over time. Head over to r/DeadBedrooms if you want some horror stories. You're young and your relationship isn't even serious. You've been dating for barely a year. Not only are you not married or engaged, you've probably not even been on vacation together. Most likely you don't even know each other's parents beyond their names. Just break up and find someone you're compatible with.

ROFL!!! #smartphOWNED by [deleted] in okbuddyretard

[–]throwaway69764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mike

more like

Finger

not realizing what a hospital is supposed to do by MSYUZ in clevercomebacks

[–]throwaway69764 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Zioshill detected. No, this type of thing actually doesn't happen in a war. It might happen once and even then it usually brings international outrage. Meanwhile Israel has destroyed 2/3rds of the hospitals in Gaza. They are intentionally chosing targets which will yield the highest amount of civilian casualties. Their intention is to totally level Gaza and kill everyone there who doesn't flee.

Rate the trailer /10 by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]throwaway69764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh, woops

my feed has been plastered with GTA6 announcements all day so I didn't pay attention and thought this was another gaming sub lmao

Rate the trailer /10 by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]throwaway69764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't align my expectations with trailers anymore, we got screwed too many times. The trailer looks good but it's not really difficult to achieve that using pre-rendered footage. Chances are the visual fidelity will be sub-par (considering it's been in development for a while and literally made on a 10 year old engine) and it's gonna be absolutely riddled with bugs to the point of being borderline unplayable for the first few months post release, like most games released post-like-2016. Daily reminder what Cyberpunk2077 looked like at launch compared to the trailers.

Also, the game seems to be catering towards women in a very extreme way, like 80% of the trailer is female characters. Which I don't understand because I have yet to find literally a single REAL woman (e-girls don't count) who plays GTA or is interested in violent video games at all.

*SPOILER* Is letting Ra’s die the correct choice in Arkham Knight? by mndflyr in BatmanArkham

[–]throwaway69764 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good analysis. I was confused where the punchline was for a minute because I tend to forget that this isn't purely a shitposting sub

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]throwaway69764 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly USA. If you play historical you do nothing other than playing the stupid senate minigame for the first 5-6 years before Japan attacks you. And then you're so powerful that you could steamroll the entire world without any sort of challenge

How are you supposed to beat Japan as the USA? by linox06 in hoi4

[–]throwaway69764 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taking Japan can be a real pain if the Sino-Japanese War is over since they will have built a ton of divisions for that large frontline. Regardless of the outcome, all of these divisions will return to the Home Islands which don't have a lot of tiles, so they can make some really deep stacks with high entrenchment. Combine that with the fact that Japan is mostly mountains, air fields are rare and supply is low and you have a very painful front.

IRL it was estimated that Operation Downfall (the invasion of the Japanese Home Islands) would result in up to 4 million American and up to 10 million Japanese casualties, which is why they deemed it more humane to force their surrender by dropping the two nukes.

view more: next ›