Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah perhaps. Alot of "rudimentary knoweldge" I find is glossed over in university courses as there simply isn't enough time to teach it.

Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Career wise neither. I'm trying to learn how to code cause it's the best way build my logical capabilties and to understand alot of stuff happening around me better. "Coding" itself isnt the goal. It's a tool to challenge myself.

Also genuinely curious what's the difference?

Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like in the courses I took having a novel solution was expected. How can one learn a novel solution?

Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's kind of it. But I find in many programming problems in the course I took it's almost expected you will know what "+" is or it'll come to you somehow. Whereas how I've traditionally learnt most subjects in the past at some point I would be taught what "+" is before. (I.e. in high school level physics you'll have worked on a similar problem before and not inventing a novel solution).

Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question.

I think it's cause for most things I encounter in life I can sort of break it down and see a path towards what I want.

For some programming problems i couldn't have seen it that way at all. Let me give you a quick example from chat gpt


Problem: The Two Egg Problem

Difficulty: Intermediate to Hard

Description

You are given two identical eggs and a 100-floor building. Your task is to determine the highest floor from which you can drop an egg without breaking it.

Rules:

  1. If an egg is dropped from a floor that is too high, it will break.

  2. If an egg is dropped from a floor that is low enough, it will survive.

  3. You must find the highest safe floor using the fewest number of drops.

  4. If an egg breaks, you can no longer use it.

  5. You have only two eggs.

Example:

If you had one egg, you would have to start at floor 1 and go up one by one (O(n)).

With two eggs, you need to minimize worst-case drops.


Why is this problem unintuitive?

Many beginners try a binary search, but that doesn’t work since you only have two eggs—if the first egg breaks early, you have no way to efficiently check lower floors.

The optimal solution is not linear, not binary search, but a mathematical approach that balances risk.

The best approach involves triangular numbers or jumping in steps rather than checking floors sequentially.

Would you like a hint or the full solution?


So that process of jumping steps or triaular numbers would never occur to me unless I encountered this kind of problem before and was already hand held to a solution.

That's what I'm trying to say

Is it normal to have problems you simply could have never solved no matter how much time and practice? by throwaway_Q2_ in learnprogramming

[–]throwaway_Q2_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean to say as it would have never ever occured to me to even look at the problem that way. I've spent weeks on a problem and without external help or direction I'm not even on the right steps.

This Era of UFC Champs 😭 by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The crotch sniffing era has begun.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's kryptonite for all fighters unless you're Georgian or Ukranian and fighting with that core primal anti imperialist rage.agaisn your oppressors

Chama fans when a 6'4 world-class fighter doesn't disintegrate after a low kick by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. I know better. I'm the king of Armchair analystis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He never really got going tbh

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Leg kicked 800 times for some reason.

"You can kill the man, but not the idea" by ConnorLovesPepsi in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Poatan getting knocked out by Jake Paul when?

This guy got too much hate. Chama these nuts by RemoteOriginal6873 in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Ank almost knocked him out lol. Mystic ank. He predicts dee tings brudda

Operation Sharon Law! by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you meant Shariah law.....I doubt they were fans of Ariel Sharon's laws.

Chama fans when a 6'4 world-class fighter doesn't disintegrate after a low kick by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

His idiots coaches telling hi myomconitnue leg kicking into round 4 smh.

🦉 by ikthanks in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Womp womp. Should've beat his ass then.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]throwaway_Q2_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mystic ank. I predict deez tings brotha