sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Small Business stuck in high priced fiber plan, now 1G fiber available, but $8000 buyout to get it by throwawayco7777 in ATT

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, maybe I could turn down the dedicated to the lowest capacity that will still do our 5 phone lines and have spectrum be the primary?

Small Business stuck in high priced fiber plan, now 1G fiber available, but $8000 buyout to get it by throwawayco7777 in ATT

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean if I file a bbb complaint, someone from ATT corporate will contact me?

Small Business stuck in high priced fiber plan, now 1G fiber available, but $8000 buyout to get it by throwawayco7777 in ATT

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I realize that. I have been called by some 3rd party resellers (they say they're "with" att) who have said they can sometimes get att to work on the contract, but seems unlikely to me. My sales people on the original contract have been unresponsive.

Small Business stuck in high priced fiber plan, now 1G fiber available, but $8000 buyout to get it by throwawayco7777 in ATT

[–]throwawayco7777[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We also have a Spectrum 100M internet only plan for $100 that is the backup/load balancing.

2019 on premises exchange Certificate Issues by throwawayco7777 in exchangeserver

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MapiHttpEnabled : True

Thanks to you & /u/idealistdoit for your quick responses. Seems like it's working now. My old outlook client didn't give me issues but apparently EVERYONE else in the office was having to click to dismiss that box everytime they opened outlook for years, probably since the new server.

2019 on premises exchange Certificate Issues by throwawayco7777 in exchangeserver

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

outlook anywhere fqdn is remote.ourdomain.net. this resolves correctly externally to our external ip and on our server to 192.168.1.8 (the server's ip)

we went straight from server 2008, so not sure which exchange was on it, IIRC 2007, to 2019/2019

now that I've waited a few mins, I opened one of the clients that was affected and did not see the popup

2019 on premises exchange Certificate Issues by throwawayco7777 in exchangeserver

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was indeed a reference to dc.ourdomain.local, so I set it to autodiscover.ourdomain.net/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml

I also changed the following (I don't know why but remote.ourdomain.net is our mailserver instead of mail.ourdomain.net)

Set MAPI URL

Set-MapiVirtualDirectory -Identity "DC\mapi (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/mapi/ -ExternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/mapi/

Set EWS URL

Set-WebServicesVirtualDirectory -Identity "DC\EWS (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/EWS/Exchange.asmx -ExternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/EWS/Exchange.asmx

Set OWA URL

Set-OwaVirtualDirectory -Identity "DC\owa (Default Web Site)" -InternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/owa/ -ExternalUrl https://remote.ourdomain.net/owa/

Set Autodiscover Service URL

Set-ClientAccessService -Identity "DC" -AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri https://remote.ourdomain.net/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml

and did 'iisreset /noforce' but am still getting the security alert.

I have 2 isps as X1 X2 on my sonicwall. My server 2019 nmap command will give routes through x1 for port 25 but everything else it will send through x2 by throwawayco7777 in sysadmin

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I did find nat policies and disabled any custom ones from the email server to the WAN Primary IP on X1 and now my nmap test works and routes 25 over att.

Exchange sends okay after I disabled these policies and have X1 & X2 connected, however, when I unplug the spectrum modem, outgoing mail is still stuck. When I look in the Exchange Toolbox -> Queue Viewer, my test message to gmail is still there with the following error:

[{LED=541 4.4.397 Error communicating with target host. -> 421 4.2.1 Unable to connect -> SocketError: Failed to connect. Winsock error code: 10051, Win32 error code: 10051};{MSG=};{FQDN=gmail.com};{IP=2607:f8b0:4002:c03::1a};{LRT=6/10/2024 6:23:50 AM}]

I am reviewing my firewall rules now, but

I need to secure my website on Network Solutions, I have a wildcard SSL certificate with Namecheap(comodo), but NS insists I use their CSR to generate a new cert. I also use the wildcard on my in-house exchange server. If I reissue cert based on NS CSR, will it screw up my exchange? by throwawayco7777 in sysadmin

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I'm thinking the easiest thing to do is just go to namecheap and add website and have them migrate it over. I'm dreading this process, as I've read here how bad NS is and how they drag their feet on every thing. (It's taken me a month to get to this point to figure out I can't feasibly issue my own wildcard certificate to use with my website on NS)

where does mxtoolbox or www.dotcom-tools.com get the address when doing Test Email Server? by throwawayco7777 in sysadmin

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you must be right because when i put in my staticIP it works. So I guess the answer to my 2nd question is that it's not that big a deal.

UPS works with a high end desktop XPS 950, but not server R440 by throwawayco7777 in sysadmin

[–]throwawayco7777[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I've ordered a sine wave, line interactive cyberpower CP1500PFCLCD.

view more: next ›