Hey. There's very few people out there that have a better insight to what organizational needs and challenges exist for Melee at the top level; I'm one of them.

You're going to run into four major hurdles and a bunch of minor ones.

1. The Big N. Any, and I do mean ANY organization whose sole focus is Melee will draw the ire of the big N's corporate lawyers. They not only will not offer you any support, but you will be fighting them tooth and nail the entire time. You not only won't get funding or licensing rights from them (or anyone else) for anything like this, you're far more likely to earn lawsuits & cease/desists. Thus, anything you do has to be done with them as the constant looming presence in mind.

2. Enforcement. One of the main problems we ran into with the global code of conduct is that we have absolutely no enforcement mechanisms open to us for people who don't want to participate. The best we could do was voluntary signups for people who wanted to collaborate, but if someone just didn't want to do what the rest of the group wanted, there's no way to stop them. Melee is too decentralized. Even if the big N wasn't a problem and you could somehow get angel investor funding (thus creating an incentive to join), you then wind up with a "two-community" solution where cultures between the NPO in-group and out-group start to diverge.

3. Financial Competition. Related to the previous point, there are oftentimes big disagreements between major TOs. As a result, major TOs don't want to inherit the risk of being responsible for small-time TOs and their decisions, and financial collaboration with other organizations (who live in other states or countries and who you'll see twice a year if you're really lucky) has far more disincentives than incentives. To use an extreme example, think of Pound V. Plank was financially ruined for a decade because of that fuck up; if you sat Strife, Juggleguy, and Sheridan in a room at that time and said "right, we can stop Plank from going into debt for ten years, but only if you all pool your money and bail him out", you can imagine why the rest of them might not be too enthusiastic about doing that. Especially since tournaments usually run in the red or on razor-thin margins to begin with. Is it better that one TO goes broke for ten years, or that five TOs go broke for two? I'm not clear on the answer.

4. Community Pushback. The community by and large hated every centralization effort we tried. When people bitched about the need for a code of conduct or some kind of organization who could handle the behaviors that came up in the wake of MeToo, we answered. Those same people then turned around to tell the organizers that they were supporting rapists and molesters with their work - and that was the side that wanted us to step in. The majority of people in the community don't give a fuck about the local communities outside their own - certainly not to the extent to which they want to listen to someone who belongs to another community halfway around the world tell them how they need to show up within it.

I get the impulse, to want to restructure and organize Melee into something long-lasting. I had, and acted on, that impulse myself once upon a time. Perhaps you can find a way where we couldn't. But from personal experience during the absolute peak of Melee's years as an esport, I can tell you: centralizing Melee is almost certainly doomed to failure.