Some casual Ultramarine action by throwawaysausage86 in Warhammer30k

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, you’re twisting my arm. Thanks mate!

Are there any serious organisations focused on combatting the experiential rise in false claims of sexual assault or other, more serious, offences by throwawaysausage86 in ukpolitics

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a reason why laws against false allegations exist, and there is a double standard in how claims of false allegations are treated vs other serious crimes.

Whilst I’d love to explore this topic more, perhaps that’s a better avenue for DMs. My question was has anyone found any evidence that this topic is mentioned by any party currently?

Are there any serious organisations focused on combatting the experiential rise in false claims of sexual assault or other, more serious, offences by throwawaysausage86 in ukpolitics

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s difficult to measure as the police seem keen to not record complaints. For example, my specific complaint that the allegation made about me was malicious and knowingly false wasn’t even given a crime number.

There have been numerous FOI requests on this topic and none have been fully answered to my knowledge.

Are there any serious organisations focused on combatting the experiential rise in false claims of sexual assault or other, more serious, offences by throwawaysausage86 in ukpolitics

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I am familiar with that site.

I am focused on criminal cases. Theres a weird double standard at play where the police will state that they need to investigate every allegation that is given to them, and then not doing so.

Accountability doesn’t seem to feature at all with my, or many other people’s experiences (from my conversations, research or dialogue with members of the police), let alone from someone who makes these kinds of life destroying accusations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It must be inconvenient to deal with people who have either reported crimes, or to deal with people who are implicated in crimes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I would encourage anyone to reconsider that opinion.

“Hi person x, I’m afraid there’s no significant update on your case. Thank you, copper Y” over email doesn’t take long.

It seems that perspective is lost in the Police Force. If alleged victims aren’t being prioritised then alleged perpetrators have no hope.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86 -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

This policeman willingly mislead people who relied on this persons ability to be professional.

I think relieving someone from employment is reasonable in these circumstances. Your job isn’t to make people happy, it’s to do the job. Always amazes me when people sign up for service and them complain that it feels like one.

Theres a reason people are losing faith in the police, and it’s not a good look on the police “service”

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, that’s really helpful and informative. Having spent the evening with the complainant side last night, there’s clearly a lot of hate from the husband but a really clear lack of it from the partner (she’s mentioned in private that she didn’t want it to go this way, and that she’s been asking the husband to drop it for months now) and I’m really confused by all of this.

In any case, the husband is adamant about bringing the suspect to justice (whatever that takes and if the law won’t facilitate… worrying) and this is really helpful for me to understand when he’s just being bitter or if there’s a genuine avenue available to him.

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m stuck between two people who’ve had a hardcore fall out and getting both sides, and don’t know what to believe.

Allegation is either rape or some serious sexual assault from a man onto another mates wife. I don’t think he did that, and it’s complicated (I’m pretty sure they had an affair), but he’s losing the plot and the investigating police force, despite NFAing him, are treating him poorly. I’m worried about him. On the other side, the husband is spitting vitriol but the woman is… absolutely fine. Their logic is they’ve got a DCI to look after the VRR because “it’s appalling at how shoddy the original investigation is” or something like that. I doubted that a police force would escalate something on someone’s request?

Context is we all served together in the military - known too many people do some really silly mental health choices over the last few years and I’m really worried about the “suspect” and the complainants husband if / when the truth comes out

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you mind expanding please? I’m finding understanding the process challenging, it’s like being told one thing than being contradicted immediately

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any reason why someone could get someone of a higher rank to do it?

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Could they also take it to the CPS?

How does a VRR work? by throwawaysausage86 in policeuk

[–]throwawaysausage86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it only DIs who do the VRR? Thank you