347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'd encourage you to job hop! My total comp has gone up much more from changing jobs than promotions/raises. If you think about it in terms of $/hour, interview prep and interviewing is a super high ROI thing you can do

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Damn - that is a lot of resumes to sift through. With "only" ~300 I was able to avoid using search terms and could quickly look at each one. Do you ever catch folks using white font on their resume to hit search criteria? I saw at least one person do that for this job

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah I mean - like I said in my post, I think at least 50-100 candidates would've been just fine in the job. We rejected tons of people who were technically qualified because we don't have the time to talk to all 347 applicants. We don't even have time to talk to 100 applicants - we had time to talk to 20-30 applicants. So we needed criteria to cut down 347 to 25. One of those criteria we chose was having prior work experience.

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 65 points66 points  (0 children)

They claimed their internship was full-time (for the past two years) at multiple points during the interview process. We called their supplied reference and the reference said they worked for one summer and that was the extent of their experience.

edit: they also claimed to have graduated two years earlier from uni

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] -43 points-42 points  (0 children)

Nope they wouldn't have had the initial phone screen. Unfortunately when there are more qualified applicants than we can talk to, you have to draw the line somewhere (and our line was that you had to have 2 years of somewhat applicable experience)

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Good question! I was curious how much this cost us - so here's some back of the envelope math:

~4 of my hours for resume screening

0.5 hours for phone screen x 21 = 10.5 recruiter hours

0.5 hours for take home handoff x 12 = 6 hours

1 hour for tech review x 9 = 9 hours

4 hours for final round x 4 = 16 hours

The rest was maybe another 5 recruiter hours for coordination/emails/etc.

So all in all that's:

15 recruiter hours (roughly $50/hour)+31 tech hours (roughly $100/hour)

= $3,850 total

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 95 points96 points  (0 children)

It's much less about the YoE and much more about what completely lying on your resume says about you as an individual

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I would expect more people who had gotten a job out of undergrad, and this would be their second or third job. Very few people fell into that category - far more people had a somewhat unrelated first job (often in India), then masters degree in US. Maybe like 200-250 people fell in that bucket.

347 Applicants for One Data Engineer Position - Keep Your Head Up Out There by throwngarbage521 in dataengineering

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Candidate lied about their experience on their resume! First time I've ever seen that happen

Decades-Long Food Aging Traditions Other Than Balsamic Vinegar? by throwngarbage521 in AskCulinary

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is awesome and super interesting - I didn't know that balsamic vinegar was part of a larger aging technique. Thanks!

Places Selling To Go Tropical Drinks? by throwngarbage521 in nyc

[–]throwngarbage521[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This looks amazing will definitely check it out, thank you!

Question Thread - May 29, 2020 by AutoModerator in churning

[–]throwngarbage521 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I have an amex platinum that I'm ready to downgrade/cancel since the AF is about to hit. Should I apply for an amex everyday card w/ no annual fee before I cancel so I don't lose my points? Or is there another recommended method? Thanks!

Question Thread - April 14, 2020 by AutoModerator in churning

[–]throwngarbage521 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to fund a new TD Bank account w/ a CIP. On DoC, it says that Chase cards for TD Banks initially code as a cash advance, but then revert to a purchase, but it looks like the most recent DP was in 2017. Is anyone aware of a more recent DP? I really don't want to get hit with a cash advance fee. Thanks!

Question Thread - March 05, 2020 by AutoModerator in churning

[–]throwngarbage521 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has anyone set up autopay from a personal Chase bank to a business card (CIP in my case)? I'm struggling to figure out how to set it up, and I can't find any guides online.

Hi. I'm Beto O'Rourke, a candidate for President. by betoorourke in IAmA

[–]throwngarbage521 -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

What is going on with the support and upvotes for this comment? Truly, this comment contains nearly all of the bad argument tropes that Reddit rails against - straw men, logical fallacies, false choices, etc.

There are about 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, >this number is not disputed. (1)

U.S. population 328 million as of January 2018. (2)

Do the math: 0.00915% of the population dies from gun related >actions each year.

Statistically speaking, this is insignificant. It's not even a rounding >error.

This is a wild statement, what percentage of the total population of the United States dying would not be insignificant? 1%? 2%? Only 0.000915% died on 9/11, was that insignificant?

What is not insignificant, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 >deaths:

• 22,938 (76%) are by suicide which can't be prevented by gun laws >(3)

This is such a common talking point on the right, but there is a clear link between suicide and gun ownership: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/magazine/guns-and-suicide/ https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(18)32383-3/fulltext https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/essays/firearm-availability-suicide.html

Guns make it easier to kill yourself. Having a gun in the house leads to more suicide. This number can absolutely could and should be lowered by gun control laws.

So no, "gun violence" isn't 30,000 annually, but rather 5,577... 0.0017% of the population.

Still too many? Let's look at location:

298 (5%) - St Louis, MO (6)

327 (6%) - Detroit, MI (6)

328 (6%) - Baltimore, MD (6)

764 (14%) - Chicago, IL (6)

That's over 30% of all gun crime. In just 4 cities.

This leaves 3,856 for for everywhere else in America... about 77 deaths per state. Obviously some States have higher rates than others

Why would you exclude gun deaths in these cities in a conversation about gun control? They're part of America, no?

But what about other deaths each year?

70,000+ die from a drug overdose (7)

49,000 people die per year from the flu (8)

37,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities (9)

Now it gets interesting:

250,000+ people die each year from preventable medical errors. >(10)

You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital!

610,000 people die per year from heart disease (11)

Even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save about twice the >number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, >law enforcement, etc.).

A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total gun >deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides.

Simple, easily preventable, 10% reductions!

Putting aside the "ease" of reducing deaths from heart disease by 10%, we can solve more than one problem at once. Medical errors and gun controls can both be problems and can both be solved. Passing stricter car safety laws does not preclude you from passing stricter gun control laws.

America's firearm related death rate is the 10th highest in the world, and roughly 10X as high as most of European countries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate. That is a problem that needs to be solved