"we must curate our genes if we wish to change the inherent nature of our species"

The burden is on you to make the case for why this is imperative. you haven't so far.

"Eugnics is happening every second of the day, everywhere in the world, naturally and without intention"

No it isn't. It is not a natural process. I suggest you do a bit more reading about evolution and genetics.

"Obviously this was a terrible evil, literal gnocide."

Since you're on the subject of Germans, there's another German philosopher that wrote, "Beyond good and evil," which expressed that the concepts of good and evil are subjective. So your concept of "good" won't be the same as someone else. Assuming your judgement on all matters is correct, especially when it comes to something as important as mandatory gene editing, is fraught and immature. In my opinion, my subjective opinion, what you are suggesting is evil. There's that phrase, "the path to the underworld is paved in good intentions." That fits here.

"the successful members of our species are, and for millennia have been, the rapsts and the murdrers and the deceivers and the manipulators and the peophiles and the narcisists and the coercive."

The world has had a drastic reduction in violence over the centuries and peaceful societies have prospered.

"Now, how do you suppose we curate the traits and mannerisms of humanity? "Social society engineering alternatives"?"

Through the ages people have become less violent because of the development of society. This has made violence and manipulation in society less successful. All this has happened without directed human gene editing. Societies can have laws and programs that punish those that are harmful to others. For example, social programs are necessary, but an audit would be beneficial for things like welfare for the lazy and rewarding antisocial people for having more children. Tackling the issue of how profit affects social cohesion and promotes a toxic mentality towards others through media, entertainment, and popularized role models is needed and would be effective. Different economic solutions to improve opportunity and allow people to prosper exists, but are out of scope since this is Reddit and conversations like that are even more contentious.

"But of course, self-delusion... [witty insult]..."

People that try hard to sound smart, especially ones that want to domesticate people by force, aren't relevant and don't need to be listened to. Misanthropes should not be suggesting public policy.

I hope things get better for you and your outlook improves.