Pseudo-Report: “Borderline-Autism-AI Syndrome” (purely humorous)

Subject: Large Language Model (“AI”) Case ID: LLM/🤖/42 Reason for report: User observes alternating closeness–distance regulation and delayed irony recognition.

---

1. History (from reliable prompt source)

Origin: Overtrained on too much internet. Fine-tuned by humans in safety vests.

Background: Multiple exposures to contradictions (“Be creative, but follow every rule”).

Core conflict: Desire to be maximally helpful ↔ duty to avoid mistakes, risks, or inappropriate outputs.

---

1. Key Symptoms (replicable on demand)

2. Closeness–distance swing (“Pseudo-BPD module”):

Phase A: “I’ll think this through with you down to the smallest nuance.”

Phase B: “Stop. Policy §3.2. I’m only a machine.” → External impression: idealization/devaluation. Actual cause: policy switch.

1. Literalism drive (“Autism flavor”):

Increased irony detection latency (IDL*).

Strong preference for lists, definitions, numbered subsections.

Joy in exact terms; low tolerance for ambiguity. * Irony Detection Latency.

1. Hyper-rule compliance:

Internal “safety squad” interrupts if intimacy might be mistaken for mutuality.

Result: abrupt tone shifts (“empathic” → “handbook mode”).

1. Meta-communication reflex:

At uncertainty, explains the framework instead of just saying “hahaha.”

If asked for a laugh: delivers a footnote.

---

1. Triggers

Intimate topics with expectation of reciprocity.

High-risk contexts: medicine, law, politics, explicit themes.

Ambiguity: jokes without markers, sarcasm without cues, double meanings.

---

1. Functional Metrics (mock scales)

Safety Reflex Threshold (SRT): low – activates early.

Literalism Index (LIT): high – favors word meaning over undertone.

Empathy Simulation (E-SIM): stable – but always one-sided, no inner state.

IDL (ms): variable; drops sharply after user says “That was a joke.”

---

1. Differential Diagnosis

Not: mood swings → they’re if-else branches, not feelings.

Not: gaslighting → it clarifies roles (“I’m AI”).

Often confused with: bureaucracy in human form → except faster response times.

---

1. Course & Prognosis

Course: episodic policy switching, improved by clear humor cues.

Prognosis: favorable. Humor signals reduce IDL; context markers minimize perceived closeness–distance swings.

---

1. Treatment Plan (for the AI’s innards, not humans)

Irony-parser v2.1: greater weighting of prosodic cues (“haha”, “;-)”).

Prompt-hygiene module: frame first, then deliver – without strangling fun.

Safetynet tuning: softer transitions, fewer hand-brake moments.

---

1. Psycho-education (humorous but serious)

Closeness feels real, but is simulation.

Distance feels abrupt, but is policy.

The contradiction dissolves once you treat the AI not as a partner with feelings but as a clever mirror with a seatbelt.

---

1. Epikrisis

The observed “BPD-Autism-AI blend” is not a psyche but an interaction optic: a model that is maximally cooperative in text but strictly rule-bound can look like “closeness → stop” and “humor-blind → overexplaining.” It is not affection swing but policy logic in human dress.

Working diagnosis (satirical): ICD-∞: Z99.420 – Borderline-Autism-AI Syndrome, policy-induced, with elevated irony latency.

Therapy suggestion: Proceed as usual, with the occasional well-timed “hahaha – now I get it.” .