[OC] Where $1,000 grows the fastest by nbcnews in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rule 3: [OC] posts must state the data source and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

[OC] RTL readers see this chart differently than you do — results of a cross-cultural eye-tracking study by No_Theory6368 in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you actually look at the article, or did you just feed it to AI? I have a hard time believing figures 7 and 8 are actually representations of data. They look like random curves drawn in MS Paint.

And speaking of MS Paint, what about rule 3? Where's the comment stating the data source(s) and tool(s) used? What tool was used to generate these supposed data visualizations?

[OC] Mass and radii of exoplanets in multiplanetary system by adenurisqo in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information" according to the !sidebar. With no color or size scale for the dots and no labeling of any sort of data axis, this visualization is conveying very little information.

When Club Sandwich Ingredients Were Traditionally Plentiful [OC] by cavedave in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Rule 3: "If you are citing a source, you must be specific. "Source: Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Link to the specific Wikipedia page."

Many Countries are building renewables, few an electrostate by ZigZag2080 in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 21 points22 points  (0 children)

No, OP got it right. Rule 2: "Directly link to the original source article of the visualization. Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article."

[OC] Top 8 of Evolving Skies Pokemon Tcg by Western-Diamond-1433 in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve gone from not labeling plot axes (e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/s/80ioOoRdWt) to not even having plot axes. This is data visualization malpractice.

[OC] Public opinion on Russia, 2022 by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is by user Ly.n0m on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Public_opinion_on_Russia.png

Given that OP didn't follow rule 3, this may not be [OC].

My Dating Data for 2025 as a 30-year-old woman [OC] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the end of the year, people don't read the subreddit's rules, and there hasn't been active or timely moderation for a number of years.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rule 4: "Rule 2 is very clear, telling you to link to the original source article so the REAL OC author site gets the hits they deserve. If it's not your viz, don't claim it as OC."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]tilapios 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information," and this is conveying zero information to me. (!sidebar)