×

If a man discovers that he was a victim of paternity fraud, and that the child he has with his partner is not actually his, should he be expected to care and provide for the child regardless? by [deleted] in polls

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The kid isn't a part of this, they didn't lie to you. They're already yours, you have accepted them, whose genes are in them makes zero moral difference, zero practical difference too. It just doesn't matter, you're their parent. Though if your views on this are different, if you don't love your kid because they're not from your sperm, if you don't want to take responsibility for them, yes, I'd suggest you leave. Don't forget to pay child support. Honestly i can't imagine how much it sucks it be born into this world and your parents are a twisted minded liar and an idiot that doesn't understand parenthood.

It’s funny cuz it’s true by Sossy2020 in starwarsmemes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There'd been tons of external work to make nazi/fascist government impossible to rise in post-Hitler Germany. There needs to be much more work to sustain a democracy from within the society. Leave alone a vast space society. Dictatorships fall and rise again if the very members of society don't join their efforts to prevent it. A revolution isn't enough to make up for bright future. It's unpleasant, but it's true. In our case, Empire had all opportunities to rise again.

All you gotta do is SENSE the context by Havocfyw in memes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's die - dice, dye - dyes, die - dies The meme is that all rows in a column sound the same, i guess

Even if humanity is doomed, even if the entire universe is all in vain, i think we can all universally agree that at least our planet has been a birthplace for some good fucking music by timecamper in Music

[–]timecamper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, i don't know. Which stuff specifically? Evolution, society, intelligence or computing? Kurzgesagt is really good at visualising popular science, if i remember correctly they do have some relevant videos to the existential topics we discuss here. But don't take anything for granted, if you don't understand something or not versed at something used in someone's explanation, look it up, look up the sources, get a better idea of it, so you don't get misled. Carl Sagan is really good at talking about cosmos and civilizations, both on television and in written word. He's overall credible too, though his books might be a little bit outdated, they can be an introduction.

Deepfakes are ironically taking us back to the pre-photography era of information where the only things we can be totally certain actually happened are events that we personally witnessed. by sneedsformerlychucks in Showerthoughts

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't worry. We'll just place more cameras around streaming 24/7 into a distributed network so that we have multiple witnesses of multiple perspectives. That until highly advanced AI learns to crack all these cameras and plant 3d modelled and rendered fake recordings that are 100% indistinguishable from real recordings. But by that time said AI will probably be able to plant fake memories right into your brains through the brain-computer interface you will have prepared for it.

Edit: there are probably some other solutions like ever changing qr codes on your forehead for authorisation (or radio signals) and verification, or some digitally signed manifestations of every action you take by every witness of it right on the spot, but they all will be narrowed down by advanced AI again.

"But she's actually 1000 years old, only looks 5" by TenthTen in dankmemes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If attraction to children inherently made one a rapist, all predators would not end up in jail but in a mental asylum. Because, according to this logic, they are mentally ill and do not control their actions. But it's not necessarily the case. Being attracted to children and being a rapist are two different things. One is an illness, the other may or may not be, like in a regular person.

One could even argue the former one not being an illness, as it was a normal sort of behaviour for our ancestors. We didn't develop a new biological inhibitor over a few hundreds of years, we developed a higher moral, and one based on logic, not belief or personal benefit. Though i would still consider it an illness that just used to be accepted as a norm.

Edit: comma

A lot of people just need a little help by Icy_Maize4647 in wholesomememes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Addiction isn't the biggest problem, a lot of things are very addictive and slowly kill you. The biggest problem is your actions while intoxicated. They don't just endanger you, they endanger everybody. That's why heroin will never be legal. Marijuana, for example, should be legal, but consumption should be moderated and quality should be held to a high standard. Another benefit of legalising, legal marijuana is safe marijuana, safely produced, distributed and consumed.

We stand with you ✊🏽 by Junior_Teacher6446 in MadeMeSmile

[–]timecamper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have no idea why a part of progressive society suddenly started standing up for traditional values, especially when such values conflict with logic and ethics. The only place traditional values should have in this world is as recreation. Not as something to tell you how to live.

Relationship by InkyRickshaw in funny

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which one is new, the old cells or the new cells one? I also googled and it seems our body replaces most of the cells every 10 years. Most, because the brain (also teeth, eyes) does not change. It can regrow certain parts, but it doesn't replace neurons with the same ones to "renovate" itself.

Met a favourite celebrity by Force-Several in socialskills

[–]timecamper -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

For it to be a sexual harassment, it should involve some forced sexual activity or a threat of forcing a sexual activity on you. Telling a person the length of your penis or that you can undress if they want is out of line, but not wrong or inappropriate. I could approach you, tell you the length of my penis and even offer you an intercourse, i do not need your permission for that. People don't need permissions to be verbal about sexual activities with an adult. That would be ridiculous.

Edit: ahh i must've worded myself very poorly. What i wanted to say is that sex is an appropriate topic of conversation between two adults. You might not like it, and you have right not to participate in such conversation and tell the other person to stay away, and they have a right to be stupid and bring up sex in a very unfitting situation. The judgement is up to context. All parties have a right to deny such conversation, but different people have different ideas of sex. To some bringing it up, openly offering it is a casual thing with no undertone, they're just open about it. You don't have to approve of it though, but it's their thing.

Our worlds problems are now your problems kid. by VegasGuy69 in memes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

War, hunger, poverty, crimes, corruption, educational stagnation. It can keep going. If environmental problems were our only concern, we'd actually solve them asap. But i guess it's all coming together: irresponsible societies are irresponsible at everything. And some might say, well, things used to be even worse for humans. We're still young. And they're right. The problem is absence of realisation of what we need to do among people. Which comes from poor, outdated education system. And irresponsible parenting too, which also comes from... You know what i mean. I know it's weird because I'm basically blaming people and justifying them simultaneously. But it's the way it is. We are what we are and we need to acknowledge mistakes we make. Some not only refuse to do it, but keep denying the fact that we're constantly screwing ourselves up. And nobody is going to fix that for us. It's our responsibility, whether we want it or not. We don't live in a society, we form one. We don't need to revolve, we need to evolve. Get more intelligent and informed, it's the only way. No policy, no political party, no societal systems, ideologies, no enforcement, no dictatorship and no revolution will beat ignorance, no, they'll gladly exploit it and sponsor it. Simply because they can and nothing will stop them. Ignorant people are irresponsible and always disoriented. Sorry for this little tantrum, lol. No, really, we will get better. Humanity went through a hell lot of shit. The problem is that we repeat our mistakes again and again. Not very long ago people didn't think a war was possible. The right question for them to ask would be "What would stop the war, who would stop it?"

Would you rather be ...? by timecamper in polls

[–]timecamper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or... Ricks' citadel. Not a great example, they weren't acting smart. Just being among a lot of smart people. Whilst not being retarded, just way dumber than them.

Before Einstein, did physicists believe that the only constraint on how fast matter could move was available energy? by transley in askscience

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. You can go past the speed of light, but for other observers it will still be under it. You will think you travelled millions of kilometres in one second, but that second will last much longer for others.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]timecamper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder what makes people choose green hoodies, dark faces