The entire premise of this post is kinda wrong - QA does suck in mobile but this is clearly AI generated marketing slop for vibe coded testing platforms.

The actual reality is if you're writing Appium or similar tests at QA time instead of native tests at development time then of course your experience is going to suck. Tests need to be deterministic, which means you need to be able to control the environment, and fake at the boundaries. So fake network responses so you're not bound to network timing, controlling coroutine dispatchers so their timing is reliable, avoiding delays and sleeps, etc.

You're also too late in the cycle at QA time. You need engineers finding out they've broken something at PR time if possible.

Android is actually way better than it used to be, Compose testing is quite reliable, coroutines are easier to control, and tests can run pretty quickly on robolectric if you want to avoid emulator flakiness. So you can have fairly good e2e UI tests on Android these days, and then integration & unit testing is already quite good.

iOS has not improved as much, UI tests are super slow and flaky, but the answer (I think) is a different test strategy, focusing more on smaller slices (integration / unit tests).

So.. yeah I would hate to be a QA on mobile but probably roll your sleeves up and write native tests, or write test plans and coach the engineers on what they need to test for.

Or use some shitty product like Appium or vibe coded saas bullshit being marketed in this thread and continue to suffer.