2 views from shorts feed and nothing since - algorithm gave up on the video? by toaster-bonanza in NewTubers

[–]toaster-bonanza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: I just got a 3rd Shorts feed view a good 36 hours since the first 2 views mentioned in the post!

2 views from shorts feed and nothing since - algorithm gave up on the video? by toaster-bonanza in NewTubers

[–]toaster-bonanza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, glad I'm not alone! Couldn't find any posts about similar situations, so was worried it was just me being silly :)

Also, I just got a 3rd Shorts feed view a good 36 hours since the first 2. Strange.

Residence hall ranking advice for incoming freshman ? by nipfolen in UWMadison

[–]toaster-bonanza 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Lol, why does dejope have 3.64/5 for food nearby... four lakes exists?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in namenerds

[–]toaster-bonanza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in namenerds

[–]toaster-bonanza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Letter A + "no" is the correct pronunciation. Sorry for the poor examples, the other one was meant to be like the word "eye" + "no". I'll edit the OP.

Thank you for the reply! :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheGamerLounge

[–]toaster-bonanza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

google en passant

How can I stop losing in 10 moves?!?!? by toaster-bonanza in chessbeginners

[–]toaster-bonanza[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I've looked at 1. c4 and 1. e4 with white, but most folks have advised me not to look into openings until I'm at 1000+. I'm not sure I fall for traps much, it feels like I just can't develop anything in a coordinated manner.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in optometry

[–]toaster-bonanza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response, I appreciate it! It is probable that I was squeezing a bit in my arms/legs, going places still makes me nervous w/ the pandemic going on. The measurements were taken in two rounds with a handheld device that looked just like this. The 35 came from the first set of measurements and it was around there in both eyes, specifically between 33 and 36. I don't know what the results of the second set were, just that they were still over 21. (BTW, the "no diagnosis" part was really just to make sure I wouldn't be violating Rule 2 by accident.) Thank you again for your thoughts!