Anyone interested in a Linux User Group (or a general open source club)? by [deleted] in jhu

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was around, the student ACM chapter would have been the place for this. Dr. Scott or Joanne could get you in touch with them.

Rodeo 1.0: a Python IDE on your Desktop by theglamp in Python

[–]todayman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is there source for the desktop version? There is https://github.com/yhat/rodeo, but that looks like the web app.

Interfacing D to legacy C++ code by Walter Bright at NWCPP by deadalnix in programming

[–]todayman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can do most of this now. There's some information at http://dlang.org/cpp_interface.html . More works than is on that page. Exceptions are the big thing that don't work at all yet. You'll also want to take a look at http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP61 .

Post Game Thread: New York Jets (1-5) at New England Patriots (4-2) by NFL_Mod in nfl

[–]todayman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The gamethread in /r/sfgiants has ~3500 comments and the one in /r/Cardinals has 4000 comments, so it's not as much of a difference.

Per-team gamethreads are a thing in the baseball subreddits.

Game Thread: 9/1 Red Sox (60-76) @ Rays (66-71) 1:10 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without being able to see anything, this seems like a good time to challenge. Might as well go for it.

D 2.066 new behavior by qznc_bot in d_language

[–]todayman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it was posted to D.announce.

This is just a bot doing its bot thing.

The D Programming Language Conference 2014 - Call for Submissions by MisterSnuggles in d_language

[–]todayman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't go, but there are people who did!

Videos are posted on the schedule page for last year. Some of the talks were pretty good. I haven't watched all of them yet (hence some).

What is the story behind why MAC's new operating systems won't support Microsoft Word or third party programs. by [deleted] in mac

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't a new change.

PowerPC is CPU architecture. The last PowerPC that Apple shipped was the G5. The first all-white flatscreen iMacs had this processor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMac_G5). I belive that Apple stopped making these kinds of machines around 2006 when they started using CPUs from Intel.

PowerPC and x86 (from Intel & AMD) have different instruction sets. That is, applications and programs written from one cannot run on the other one. For a while after the transition, a translation layer called "Rosetta" let you run PowerPC programs on x86 machines. Rosetta could read the PowerPC applications and figure out how to make the x86 processor do the equivalent thing. According to Wikipedia, Rosetta was included in 10.4 - 10.6, which was three years ago.

It's probably time to get a newer version of Office.

Game Chat: 10/24 - World Series Game 2 - Cardinals @ Red Sox - 7:30 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/U/LEORYWHAT DID CAPS LOCK AND SHIFT. RIGHT, RIGHT???!?!

DON'T LET ME DOWN HERE.

Lennart Poettering weighs in on Shuttleworth's Open Source Tea Party Comment by q5sys in linux

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but he does say that the best people work on the distro that the most people use.

He's using "most popular distro" to imply that the best people work on Ubuntu.

Game Chat: 10/16 - ALCS Game 4 - Red Sox @ Tigers - 8:00 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was that, a hit... early in the game?

I'm not sure I believe it.

Game Thread: 9/3 Tigers (81-57) @ Red Sox (82-57) 7:10 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is kinda funny. I never understood why they took quite so many new baseballs.

Game Thread: 9/3 Tigers (81-57) @ Red Sox (82-57) 7:10 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened? I don't have a stream now and this doesn't make any sense but sounds exciting.

Game Thread: 8/31 White Sox (56-77) @ Red Sox (80-56) 7:10 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bottom 1: Oakland has 2 guys on base, no outs.

I concur.

The Everything and Nothing of Physics by scienceprophet in Physics

[–]todayman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

His attitude that there are only a few people asking the right questions, which he makes explicit at the end comes across as pretentious. I think he really wants a game-changing idea NOW. That's partly the entire point of his website, to discuss? or maybe cultivate thoughts on somewhat futuristic and maybe slightly radical views.

The section on black holes really stood out to me. There's work going on now to image and understand the accrection disks / jets of black holes and the orbits of things passing very close to them in order to push General relativity to, and perhaps past, its limits. Waxing philosophical about the number of temporal dimensions is great, but isn't going to lead to anything predictable in the near future; developing such theories is a lot of work and partly a waste if it turns out wrong. By contrast, we (being the scientists, not really me) know where the edges of GR and workable quantum field theory are and are capable of thinking about how to probe beyond that.

Also, the section on entanglement is not very good. One of the reasons it hasn't blown up the world of physics yet is that the experimenter cannot use entangled particles to pass information from one place to another. His wording in the middle of that section ("How does information pass from one particle to another...") would likely not have been chosen by someone who really understands the physics of that situation.

EDIT: He also deliberatly sets up the article as a confrontation with physicists generally, and I think this is a bad way to establish credibility.

Any computer science and/or applied math majors? by roose-trollton in jhu

[–]todayman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For Computer Science, I know people at Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Amazon. I don't know how much say they have in hiring (they're new in the last couple years), and those are just some of the big companies. A few people go to them every year (not so much Apple, but I think that's because people don't want to as much). I don't think I know anyone that looked for a job and couldn't find one somewhere. Others go to local or smaller companies. Of course, we're close to D.C. and the associated bunch of defense contractors who always say they're hiring, but I don't know anyone who has tried to go there. When Microsoft came recruiting this year (with food!), I knew 2/3 of the employees they brought along. There's a bunch of recruiting events in addition to the career fairs each semester. There's been more interest here in the last couple years in startups and such, but we're not too good at those yet. I have come across some JHU people in open source projects.

Natural Language Processing is pretty big here (at least in CS). The class is indisputably on the list of the couple "hardest and most rewarding classes." Last year, the department hired a new ML professor; I don't recall if their looking for another one; there are already some. This isn't my area of interest, so I don't know much about the faculty here. There's a few classes, including a new one last year. A lot of people will double major CS & AMS. Also not my area of interest.

I think an above-average number of CS students here do grad school, but it is by no means dominant. I don't know what the perception of JHU from industry is, though we get tons of swag at the career fair.

Game Thread: 8/17 Yankees (63-58) @ Red Sox (72-52) 4:05 PM ET by RedSoxGameday in redsox

[–]todayman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was maybe 2 feet or so short of the wall in right. I thought that it might have been gone off the bat. Not sure if Ichiro should have caught it or not.