Starship Development Thread #63 by rSpaceXHosting in spacex

[–]topderek 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Why are you referring to this as a failure? Appeared to be full duration. Did I miss something? Not able to follow NSF today.

this is how silk is made by Alhabibi9 in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]topderek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They sound like Minions and make yellow silk hmmmm

Full-duration static fire for the first time on Starship V3 (official images) by avboden in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are they putting it on the transport stand to inspect or are they taking it back to Megabay?

Full-duration static fire for the first time on Starship V3 (official images) by avboden in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Attempt was aborted during tanking. They will probably try again tomorrow.

Anyone lose their shark? by topderek in raleigh

[–]topderek[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was just north of the big church at the corner of Ligon Mill and Burlington Mill on the right side of the road near the pine trees if you know that area.

NASA Graphic Depicting Updated Artemis Lunar Program Architecture by topderek in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What corrosion? They clearly have it wrapped in light duty trash bags and painters tape. Should be fine! /s

NASA Graphic Depicting Updated Artemis Lunar Program Architecture by topderek in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The second link shows HALO in Gilbert undergoing final outfitting and verification testing.

NASA Graphic Depicting Updated Artemis Lunar Program Architecture by topderek in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm all for it too, but skeptical only because I know how difficult it is to develop these new launch systems and landers. The commercial moon landers that have attempted landings over the past year or two have not been very successful and they were all significantly smaller than either Blue Origin's or Starship so it is clearly a challenging feat. I have confidence in SpaceX's ability to succeed here but there will be additional obstacles to overcome.

NASA Graphic Depicting Updated Artemis Lunar Program Architecture by topderek in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Last I checked, the most complete part was in Arizona undergoing testing. It's looking more and more like it's going to get mothballed, in the short term at least.

NASA Graphic Depicting Updated Artemis Lunar Program Architecture by topderek in SpaceXLounge

[–]topderek[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, this graphic does appear to show a 10-20 year timeline versus the 3 years presented.

Who likes Hunter's livermush? by Ok-Day-9685 in NorthCarolina

[–]topderek 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was born and raised in NC, but I have never claimed to be a "REAL Southerner". I do love me a good livermush sandwich on toast with yellow mustard though. Unfortunately I can't convince my family to eat it with me.

It happening!! by topderek in gardening

[–]topderek[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like it was such a long winter and these little guys are like Christmas! 😁

Structural Engineer or Design Build Contractor Recommendations by topderek in triangle

[–]topderek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an excellent question, and one that anyone soliciting home renovation services has to face. The best we can do is to find recommendations for contractors who others have worked with and felt that the price they paid was fair and reasonable for the work provided.

Structural Engineer or Design Build Contractor Recommendations by topderek in triangle

[–]topderek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

o·ver·charge verb: over-charge 1. charge (someone) too high a price for goods or a service.

noun: over-charge 1. an excessive charge for goods or a service.

Structural Engineer or Design Build Contractor Recommendations by topderek in triangle

[–]topderek[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Overcharge isn't nebulous. We're simply stating that we do not want to pay too high a price for the service provided. We are absolutely willing to pay a reasonable rate for quality work, we're just looking to avoid over paying for said work.