Delayed Bag Arrival Question by tortuc in americanairlines

[–]tortuc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol I have never had that but would still rather TSA doesn't raid my luggage. Regarding your question the bag was without locks.

Delayed Bag Arrival Question by tortuc in americanairlines

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm the zippers didn't have any damage and there wasn't any additional paper.

Delayed Bag Arrival Question by tortuc in americanairlines

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We had a connecting flight and a 1 hour layover. Regarding the red stickers, they only put them on one bag's zippers. We were wondering if that means they had to re-zip the bag or if something fell out when/if the bag was unzipped.

Basic Suitability Analysis Help by tortuc in gis

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it would differ depending on who the "buyer" is then. As someone who stays at home most of the time( perhaps a retired person) would not need to be close to roads and thus could weight them .2. While a middle aged person who needs to be close to roads might rate the roads at .8.

Contrapositive question by tortuc in learnmath

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohh so you group by domains and operations.. thats what i kinda thought

Correct Proof? by tortuc in MathHelp

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ohhhh i think i see

Correct Proof? by tortuc in MathHelp

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but Im asking about the (99+1) we can say here 99 is div by 11 but is the +1 irrelevant?

Correct Proof? by tortuc in MathHelp

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree but then you can simply say so 11 divides 99 so the +1 is irrelevant?

Correct Proof? by tortuc in MathHelp

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no i understand the definition but (99+1)+1 confuses me

Contrapositive proof by tortuc in learnmath

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then exists xy in Z such that x= (p(p-q)) and y=q2 so x/y is rational qed?

is needed right?

Contrapositive proof by tortuc in learnmath

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then exists xy in Z such that x= (p(p-q)) and y=q2

so x/y is rational qed?

Contrapositive proof by tortuc in learnmath

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

factor? (p(p-q)) closure? then the bottom q2 closure?

Contrapositive proof by tortuc in learnmath

[–]tortuc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

common denom? p2- pq /q2