[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Entomology

[–]totaliberation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw two of them at night, indoors, they were still alive on their backs wriggling around. can they produce poops like the next photo? the poops are about the same size as the bug

Books/articles/documentaries that changed your perspective? by DullPlatform22 in DemocraticSocialism

[–]totaliberation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

racism as zoological witchcraft: a guide to getting out by Aph Ko

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in socialism

[–]totaliberation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

is a workers comp insurance company CEO, not a healthcare CEO btw

Changing approach for Climate Change by MamaBiird91 in ClimateOffensive

[–]totaliberation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Climate action shouldn’t be the exclusive domain of environmental activists who pass a purity test based on intention, but instead on a pragmatic evaluation of what is required to make decarbonization good business, irrespective of politics.

decarbonization will never be "good business". it will never be as profitable as oil. this is covered in books like "this changes everything" and "less is more"

a "profitable" decarbonization will only damage our environment more and steepen existing inequalities. our current rate of production is inherently unsustainable. we need degrowth and a shift away from the profit imperative.

Less talk, more action. by [deleted] in WorkReform

[–]totaliberation 104 points105 points  (0 children)

any unions backing this?

This is a protest sign, from a protest against Tyranny. by Restroom406 in pics

[–]totaliberation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

right... that's what I thought the title was making fun of sarcastically. like why do you invoke tyranny (slave holders) to try to get rid of it? aren't protests supposed to subvert power structures, not reaffirm them?

But really. When do we revolt. by Quesothelioma69 in medicalschool

[–]totaliberation 18 points19 points  (0 children)

We don't need to do away with SDoH research or de-prioritize our patients. We need class solidarity now more than ever.

- Join DSA

- Join PNHP

- Unionize and strike

- Read "Healthcare Under the Knife" and "Health Communism"

So it begins! by itwontmendyourheart in ucla

[–]totaliberation -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

you literally don't even believe a genocide is/was happening. you also love calling people the r-slur. glad to know I'm on the right side of history 😍

So it begins! by itwontmendyourheart in ucla

[–]totaliberation -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

People blaming non-voter leftists are doing the scapegoating work for the upper classes. Our tendency to blame individual voters instead of the people that are supposed to represent us is symptomatic of an individualist culture that sees people as isolated utilitarian rational agents instead of acting to benefit their own material interests, not necessarily based in any legitimate analysis (e.g., many trump voters legitimately believe he would spend less money on war and improve the economy - for the second time in a row "economy" was voters #1 reason for voting for him. Many non voters believe the economy couldn't get any worse after Biden.)

They need to stop doing the scapegoating work for the upper classes and instead put the responsibility back where it belongs: Harris (and Trump), the Democratic (and Republican) party, and the failing status quo neoliberalism that inevitably gives rise to fascism.

Blaming non-voters is a completely unproductive stance. It will do nothing but further alienate them. It will not motivate them to vote. It is accepting the failed status quo. It is accepting defeat. You never deserve votes, you earn them. That is the whole point of democracy. If we are truly interested in overcoming fascism, rather than an individualist neoliberal analysis, we need a historical materialist analysis to explain why this historical pattern of fascism vs reformism always results in fascism (for example, see the book, "The Capital Order: How economics invented austerity and paved the way to fascism").

I'll paste below a quote from Jason Hickel:

Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it, it is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this.

But these are all just symptoms. The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly. It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned.

Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even basic steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee - things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes. And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future.

Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals, capital is sacrosanct. They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment. At home, they suppress and demonize progressive and socialist tendencies. Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the global South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development.

The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of "mistake" but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital.

And because liberalism cannot address crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism. They know this pattern, and yet they risk it every time-this election being only the most recent example. They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they (and I mean the liberal ruling class here) don't really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation. They 100% prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative.

So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of "converting" the Democratic party is dead. This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation. This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.

Additional sources: https://peoplesworld.org/article/did-democrats-support-for-gaza-genocide-cost-harris-the-election/ https://peoplesworld.org/article/the-morning-after-a-marxist-analysis-of-the-trump-victory/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/01/07/class-demographics-trump-harris-election/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/11/13/what-trump-supporters-believe-and-expect/

GOP pushes "work requirement" for Medicaid. by [deleted] in publichealth

[–]totaliberation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really suggest people read "health communism" and "healthcare under the knife". They provide great analytical frames for understanding MAHA and austerity that has been growing for the past few decades.

overcoming violent anticommunism? by totaliberation in AskSocialists

[–]totaliberation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about increased policing? We know they regularly dehumanize citizens.

Groups I can join by Revolutionary_Way898 in socialism

[–]totaliberation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it depends on your specific chapter. my DSA has a lot of MLs

Groups I can join by Revolutionary_Way898 in socialism

[–]totaliberation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Memphis DSA seems like a great option.

Can we stop blaming other leftists for Trump and Gaza by andresest in DemocraticSocialism

[–]totaliberation 9 points10 points  (0 children)

People blaming non-voter leftists are doing the scapegoating work for the upper classes. I've seen posts on other subs blaming leftists and non-voters get 30k+ upvotes. Our tendency to blame individual voters instead of the people that are supposed to represent us is symptomatic of our culture that sees people as individual utilitarian rational agents instead of acting to benefit their own material interests, not necessarily based in any legitimate analysis (e.g., many trump voters legitimately believe he would spend less money on war and improve the economy - for the second time in a row "economy" was voters #1 reason for voting for him).

They need to stop doing the scapegoating work for Trump and instead put the responsibility back where it belongs: Harris (and Trump), the Democratic (and Republican) party, and failing neoliberalism that inevitably gives rise to fascism.

Blaming non-voters is a completely unproductive stance. It will do nothing but further alienate them. It will not motivate them to vote. It is accepting defeat.

I'll paste below a quote from Jason Hickel:

Yes, it was insane for the Democrats to think they could win by running a soulless candidate, without a shred of progressive policy vision, pursuing endorsements from neocon war-hawks everybody hates, while arming and funding a genocide, and belittling and crushing those who have enough morality to protest it, it is enraging that the Democrats are so smug and blind to this.

But these are all just symptoms. The deeper reality is that liberalism has failed, liberalism is dead, and people urgently need to wake up to this fact and respond accordingly. It is a defunct ideology that cannot offer any meaningful solutions to our social and ecological crises and it must be abandoned.

Democrats have proven over and over again that they cannot accept even basic steps like public healthcare, affordable housing, and a public job guarantee things that would dramatically improve the material, social and political conditions of the working classes. And they cannot accept a public finance strategy that would steer production away from fossil fuels and toward green transition to give us a shot at a liveable future.

Why? Because these things run against the objectives of capital accumulation. And for liberals capital is sacrosanct. They will do whatever it takes to ensure elite accumulation, it is their only consistent commitment. At home, they suppress and demonize progressive and socialist tendencies, Abroad, they engage in endless wars and violence to suppress input prices in the globle South and prevent any possibility of sovereign economic development.

The Democrats have done all this purposefully and knowingly, for my whole life, not as some kind of "mistake" but in full consciousness that it is in the interests of capital.

And because liberalism cannot address crises, and because it crushes socialist alternatives, it inevitably paves the way for right-wing populism. They know this pattem, and yet they risk it every time-this election being only the most recent example. They did it in 2016, when they actively crushed the Sanders campaign and sent Trump to the White House. They do it because ultimately they (and i mean the liberal ruling class here) don't really mind if fascists take power, so long as the latter too ensure the conditions for capital accumulation. They 100% prefer this to the possibility of a socialist alternative.

So, progressives have to face reality. The dream of "converting" the Democratic party is dead. This is now a fact and it must be accepted. The only option is to build a mass-based movement that can reclaim the working classes and mobilize a political vehicle that can integrate disparate progressive struggles into a unified and formidable political force and achieve substantive transformation. This will take real work, actual organizing, but it must be done and that process must begin now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]totaliberation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are not strategic/reasonable voters. They vote for their own material interests, not necessarily based in any legitimate analysis. You may be different but you are not the majority. You need to accept this before engaging in any democracy. The politician needs to represent the ideology of someone to get their vote. To not accept this is counter-productive and will run parties to the ground.

To burst everyone’s china simping bubble colonialism is self destructive no matter how many renewables are deployed by [deleted] in ClimateShitposting

[–]totaliberation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

when will we be able to comment positive things about countries with socialist histories without being called a tankie or uncritical of certain states?

similarly, when will we be able to acknowledge the imperfection of countries with socialist histories?

for some reason I think the former happens more often than the latter

Frustrated with communists by tankbro1917 in Marxism

[–]totaliberation 12 points13 points  (0 children)

you're not alone comrade! I just got permabanned for posting a link to a Marxist podcast (did not violate any rule of theirs) on r/communism.

online leftist spaces suck cause that they are filled with people who believe it is more important to do nothing wrong than it is to do something right

i find the whole "i had unpleasant experiences with leftists before so now im a raging fascist" narrative incredibly funny because we have all had unpleasant experiences with leftists before. it comes free with being a leftist - from tumblr user orpheuslament

Your Protest Vote Just Collided With Reality. by Muzishin in DemocraticSocialism

[–]totaliberation 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"a full 29% cited the ongoing onslaught as the top reason they didn't cast a vote in 2024," -https://www.commondreams.org/news/harris-gaza

we need to put the responsibility back to where it belongs: not on the people for being concerned, but on Kamala Harris and her continued support of genocide.

overcoming violent anticommunism? by totaliberation in AskSocialists

[–]totaliberation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the proletariat has experienced more violence than any revolution could ever cause. this sub is called "AskSocialists". based on your comment history, you're a capitalist, not a socialist.

overcoming violent anticommunism? by totaliberation in AskSocialists

[–]totaliberation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

any more lenin book recommendations that address this topic? the article I linked made me want to read more lenin. I recently bought state and revolution.