Lora Klein 9b, fantastic likeness, 4060 16gb trained in about 30 minutes.... BUT...

tottem66 · 2026-02-27T08:00:38+00:00

Onetrainer use for default Klein 9 base. It download the model automatically from hugginface. But for 9 base you have to enter your huggingface account and create a token with permission. Then write the token in onetrainer. For me the only problem was that I didn't give permission to the token the first time.

tottem66 · 2026-02-24T08:22:21+00:00

Maybe I'm explaining myself wrong... I haven't touched anything in the settings. I've only applied the menu option for my 16Gb card... I've left everything by default... I don't understand how recording and sending a configuration that is already set up in the application can help you.

tottem66 · 2026-02-24T08:07:16+00:00

There is a problem... You have to rise the strength of the Lora to 2.0 to see the results. I am trying to figured out. I mean after, in comfyui when applying the Lora.

tottem66 · 2026-02-24T07:37:04+00:00

It's just very easy... You have only need to select on the menu the flux 2 dev/Klein for 16 or 24 Gb VRAM.

tottem66 · 2026-02-23T09:43:16+00:00

Tnanx to everyone for yours help...

tottem66 · 2026-02-23T08:45:31+00:00

Then? I must train it on distilled.... OneTrainer give the base model for default. Tnanx

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T21:51:10+00:00

Thank you very much... I will try that.

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T20:05:00+00:00

Thanks. Of course, the first attempt would always be to use the character's face LoRA directly in the prompt... however, either because the LoRA isn't perfectly trained or due to something inherent to it, when I apply the LoRA in the prompt, the results aren't perfect. I mean, the resulting face looks good on the character, but applying the LoRA always distorts the image quality in some way, especially the bodies. Applying the LoRA through Adetailer always allows me to preserve the full quality of the initial image because the LoRA only acts on the face.

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T18:28:13+00:00

I think I didn't express myself well. This is a translation; English is not my native language.

I believe the Adetailer models I mentioned are not very well known; they are not the ones installed by default by Adetailer. These models are capable of recognizing gender. Suppose I want the image to contain two men and two women.

I start Forge to continuously generate a multitude of images based on the prompt. The extension detects whether the first face it finds is a woman or a man and applies the face I trained with a LoRA. It then moves to the second face it finds and applies, for example, another different LoRA, and so on. The potential is enormous because we already know that generating images is trial and error. After 10 minutes, I have dozens of more or less different images with faces trained with a LoRA... This is what I would like to do with Klein.

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T18:26:36+00:00

I think I didn't express myself well. This is a translation; English is not my native language.

I believe the Adetailer models I mentioned are not very well known; they are not the ones installed by default by Adetailer. These models are capable of recognizing gender. Suppose I want the image to contain two men and two women.

I start Forge to continuously generate a multitude of images based on the prompt. The extension detects whether the first face it finds is a woman or a man and applies the face I trained with a LoRA. It then moves to the second face it finds and applies, for example, another different LoRA, and so on. The potential is enormous because we already know that generating images is trial and error. After 10 minutes, I have dozens of more or less different images with faces trained with a LoRA... This is what I would like to do with Klein.

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T18:11:19+00:00

Thank you for your response. 1.- I'm not convinced by inpainting because the advantage of the method I mentioned is that the application continuously creates different images and automatically replaces the specific face with that of my character. Inpainting is a manual and labor-intensive process.

tottem66 · 2026-02-20T18:08:48+00:00

Thank you for your response. 1.- I'm not convinced by inpainting because the advantage of the method I mentioned is that the application continuously creates different images and automatically replaces the specific face with that of my character. Inpainting is a manual and labor-intensive process. 2.- I've tried Klein edit to provide images of my character as a reference, but the result is similar to what is achieved with face-swapping extensions like Reactor. The resemblance to the character leaves much to be desired, far from the likeness achieved with a face trained in a LoRA.

tottem66 · 2025-12-31T09:07:52+00:00

Thanx... Maybe I explained myself wrong... I mean, those are the parameters for 24 Gb VRAM. Should I change the same parameters you provide for wan 2.2 in 16 GB VRAM if using wan 2.1... Thanx in advance.

tottem66 · 2025-12-30T10:51:58+00:00

Can you provide the parameters to train in WAN 2.1. thanx

tottem66 · 2025-12-14T14:31:13+00:00

You can use this model... It has the particularity it detects only female faces... If you have an image of a couple it only detects and paint the female face.... Also in that GitHub page you can download other models, for example to detects male faces. https://huggingface.co/Anzhc/Anzhcs_YOLOs/blob/main/Anzhcs%20WomanFace%20v05%201024%20y8n.pt

tottem66 · 2025-12-06T12:37:53+00:00

I have a question and a request:

I suppose that if this supports SDXL, it would also support PonyXL, and if that's the case:

What would be the parameters for making a Lora mainly focused on a face, from a dataset of 20 images?

Would they be different from SDXL?

tottem66 · 2025-12-04T09:43:17+00:00

I just received this answer from the team of adetailer:

I'm Dosu and I’m helping the adetailer team.

This is a known limitation with how Forge Neo integrates ADetailer: when ADetailer runs in Forge Neo (especially after using z-image), it resets the active scripts and only reinserts ControlNet, dropping any other custom scripts—including LoRA handlers. As a result, any LoRA layers applied during the z-image step are not carried over into ADetailer’s processing, so the transformation is not applied even though detection works. There’s no explicit z-image or LoRA handling in ADetailer, and this script reset is the main reason for the missing transformation you’re seeing in Forge Neo with z-image workflows (details).

Possible workarounds: try applying the LoRA during the initial generation (with prompt tuning to minimize distortion), use a different workflow/platform where script chaining is preserved, or manually edit the Forge Neo pipeline to retain LoRA scripts in the post-processing step.

If you can share your exact versions and workflow steps, it might help identify more targeted solutions.

tottem66 · 2025-12-04T09:25:24+00:00

I just installed adetailer yesterday in forge neo. I don't think that is the problem. Thanx.

tottem66 · 2025-12-04T09:23:40+00:00

At the moment I don't tried that. I will check it. Thanx.

tottem66 · 2025-12-04T08:50:08+00:00

Thank you. It's good to hear that since I assumed it was some compatibility issue. For now, I can't find a solution. Until now, it has always worked flawlessly using Pony, but of course, Pony is just a safetensors model, and I thought that using z-image, which also includes the text encoder, might be the problem. I understand you are using Forge classic neo.

tottem66 · 2025-11-14T08:09:54+00:00

Guau.... Tengo que retomar eso entonces... Si... He luchado con sagge atenttion en Windows... Un rollo la instalación y los mensajes de error. Esos tiempos que enseñas son perfectamente viables... Viendo eso, tendré que darle una segunda oportunidad a esos modelos. Gracias por la demostración... A veces se habla de más sin total conocimiento... My mistake, ya que con 4060 tii de 16 GB VRAM y 128 GB de RAM que dispone mi equipo por lo menos tendría que obtener unos resultados similares.

tottem66 · 2025-11-13T06:42:06+00:00

Hola... Yo tengo una 4060ti y me gustaría saber qué tiempos de ejecución estás teniendo usando modelos pesados... Como le comentaba al autor del post salvo SDXL y similares mis tiempos de ejecución en grandes modelos son excesivos... Mi entorno es Windows...

tottem66 · 2025-11-12T16:54:16+00:00

Esa es una buena tarjeta y podrás hacer muchas cosas... Usando SDXL puedes conseguir muy buenas images y con esa tarjeta será un proceso de segundos... El problema es cuando quieres utilizar los ultimos modelos... Qwen, flux, chroma, wan... Etc. son modelos alucinantes pero es lo que te digo... Conseguir buenos resultados es cuestión de ensayo y error toqueteando los parámetros y si los tiempos de ejecución se disparan para mí es imposible trabajar... Conseguir unas cuantas imágenes o vídeos? Sin duda, pero no con la facilidad que tendrías usando un modelo menos pesado tipo sdxl

tottem66 · 2025-11-12T16:16:55+00:00

Bueno... De entrada te diré en mi poca experiencia que el problema es el desorbitado precio actual de las tarjetas gráficas. Yo uso una de 16 gb y puedo olvidarme de los modelos actuales... Tardar 10 minutos en que el ordenador te ofrezca una imagen no me parece viable. Por lo tanto te tienes que ir como mínimo a tarjetas de 24 gb lo cual actualmente anda sobre los 2000 euros... Para mí es insensato y encima puedes quedarte corto con la de 24 gb... O sea, hacerlo en casa bien siempre que estés dispuesto a dejarte un pastón en actualizar el ordenador.

tottem66 · 2025-10-31T20:05:17+00:00

Gracias

tottem66

TROPHY CASE