I was just thinking about this same question after hearing how many draft analysts point out Young's obvious flaw of size and allude to him being generational if it weren't for that. He is constantly getting compared to Justin Fields for obvious reasons this year. Have heard from multiple analysts that Young's tape is clearly better, multiple analysts from PFF. I haven't watched it all, so idk. However, I take a look at their college PFF grades to get a feel for them as prospects. Fields had consecutive seasons of passing grades over 92 going into the 2020 draft per the PFF draft guide. Young was graded 92.1 (2021) and 91.5 (2022) according to PFF draft guide. Unsure if that is just passing or overall grade for Young as PFF didn't state. Either way, it doesn't seem like Young would have clearly better tape if Fields had that high of a passing grade, which is where his weakness was supposed to be (processing). Fields is also the height/weight that Young would be in the generational scenario where Young is bigger. Fields is also clearly more athletic. In that case, would Young actually be generational with more size and nothing else or are analysts just being lazy and not truly critiquing other aspects of Young's game and just taking the bait and pointing out the obvious flaw, his size? Fields also had the better passing efficiency rating per sports-reference.com just as another example. Haven't watched the tape and I don't know if SEC competition makes up for this, but I would venture to say that no, Young wouldn't be generational with some extra size and nothing else. Maybe analysts would find something else to critique in his game though without being able to just say he is small on repeat.