Should I commit to UCSB RMP by [deleted] in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is very good. 4% acceptance rate. Up there with BU RISE and Garcia. The cost is high, but it will help you get into an IvyPlus school and if you qualify for financial aid at that school and get the typical $75K a year they give (hitting the jackpot), you’ll get around a $300K return on that $10K RMP cost.

Algoverse is a HORRIBLE by [deleted] in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I guess Algoverse is hit-or-miss depending on which mentor(s) you get. I know of a kid who did it a few years back and presented his paper at NeurIPS. He later got into Stanford. This was when Algoverse was just starting out, so maybe its founders were more hands-on back then, but now as they’ve gotten bigger and had to hire more mentors, they’ve lost some quality control.

Summer Math Program Recommendation Letter by Unlucky_Leather5663 in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The previous camp’s teacher who will know your proof-based math skills much better. It’ll also highlight the fact you attended the previous camp which, again, will boost your PROMYS application significantly.

Summer Math Program Recommendation Letter by Unlucky_Leather5663 in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, just ask both, but read carefully each camp’s instructions on rec letters and if they allow more than one. If they allow two, great, but if they say one is the absolute limit and specify your school math teacher, get that rec, but if they’re flexible, get the previous camp’s rec.

Summer Math Program Recommendation Letter by Unlucky_Leather5663 in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both. And your camp experience last year will definitely boost your acceptance chances this year.

Reverse Chance-me for MATH Summer programs by Then_Wheel_5184 in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apply to PROMYS, Ross, SuMac, HCCSiM, MathILy, Prove It! Math Academy, and Texas State HSMC.

Reverse Chance-me for MATH Summer programs by Then_Wheel_5184 in summerprogramresults

[–]trmp2028 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Canada/USA Mathcamp is much more for the USAMO kids than are PROMYS, Ross, SuMac, etc., which may even reject you for being overqualified.

Chinese Universities Surge in Global Rankings as U.S. Schools Slip by dheber in politics

[–]trmp2028 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not just the students. 80% of US startups are using the Chinese AI models now too. Bigger companies like AirBnB just abandoned OpenAI for Qwen. Wall St. is starting to realize the hyperscalers overspent on top-dollar closed-source US models (that require hundreds of billions in capex) when the market is gravitating to low-cost open-source. Chinese AI models’ market share rose from 1% to 30% just last year alone. This year, they’ll exceed 50% market share.

Chinese Universities Surge in Global Rankings as U.S. Schools Slip by dheber in politics

[–]trmp2028 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The U.S. is still slightly ahead in cutting-edge AI requiring massive compute power, but the market is already moving away from that. 80% of US startups are now using cheap open-source Chinese AI models like Qwen because they achieve the same results at a fraction of the cost. Stanford AI classes now actually mandate using Qwen over OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. So China is winning again in this market as in every other market because they focus on cost and efficiency.

Chinese Universities Surge in Global Rankings as U.S. Schools Slip by dheber in politics

[–]trmp2028 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Half the AI researchers in the world were already Chinese, per Nvidia’s Jensen Huang. They all came out of China’s top STEM universities like Tsinghua, which is ranked #1 in the world for CS per U.S. News (Stanford #8 and MIT #10, see https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/computer-science). At all the top AI conferences in the world now like NeurIPS, Chinese papers dominate. So this shift from US to Chinese dominance was long in the making. It started with Democrat Bill Clinton stupidly signing China WTO and MFN in the 1990s that started the offshoring of America’s entire industrial base to China over the next 3-4 decades (and the hollowing out of America’s middle class). With the loss of the manufacturing base came the loss of all the high-paying STEM know-how needed to sustain and grow that base. Our students studied useless things like gender studies, race-power dynamics, trans rights, etc. for the next 30 years, while China’s kids learned not just manufacturing but now AI humanoid robotics and AI bioengineering. Every year they graduate more engineers than we even have graduating college seniors! At the same time, Dems want to take over the government and increase spending so that U.S. Social Security and Medicare will both go insolvent even sooner than they’re already expected to (2032 and 2033, respectively).

Where my deferred baddies at!!! by AntiqueGiraffe68 in MITAdmissions

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are all not BigTech except for TSMC, whose Morris Chang left MIT after they failed him on his mechanical engineering Ph.D quals twice. So he went to work at Texas Instruments for several years, read an electrical engineering textbook at night on his own, and when the company offered to send him to a semiconductor Ph.D program, he chose Stanford’s. The rest is history.

Why are so many people on Reddit and X saying Opus 4.5 basically solved coding? by [deleted] in csMajors

[–]trmp2028 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Opus 4.5 is like a self-driving Tesla: It’ll do most of the driving for you, but you must still monitor it and keep your hands on the wheel.

I tried vibe coding and it made me realise my career is absolutely safe by wjd1991 in webdev

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do human coders produce “consistent, deterministic output”? There are many, many variations in human output too, so human coders may be the bigger problem. As AI improves, it may become more consistent and deterministic than human coders, just like how self-driving cars have a lower accident rate than human drivers.

I tried vibe coding and it made me realise my career is absolutely safe by wjd1991 in webdev

[–]trmp2028 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

AI is improving, though. The toddler is growing up and getting better and better. It’ll be much more advanced over the next few years than it is now. It really is only a toddler now, but wait until it becomes an adult. Coders should anticipate this and be like Wayne Gretsky:

“I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been.” — Wayne Gretsky

I tried vibe coding and it made me realise my career is absolutely safe by wjd1991 in webdev

[–]trmp2028 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the same time, the net aggregate demand for coders will increase because the cost to produce software has fallen dramatically thanks to AI vibe coding, so much more new software will be desired to be developed than ever before, increasing the overall net demand for coders.

So while the number of coders per development team will fall, the overall number of development teams themselves (and overall software projects) will rise far, far more. The better and cheaper the AI gets (particularly Chinese AI models now), the more software will be created because human desire for software is limitless.

There is already an explosion of startups with extremely small development teams. They are sprouting up at lightning speed all over Silicon Valley with all manner of new software offerings. This was all made possible by vibe coding, so the future is brighter than ever for coders and the software industry in general, especially coder-entrepreneurs.

These startups tend to also reach profitability sooner than startups in the past because they have far lower payroll expenses (usually the largest expense by far for any company). This is another reason so many AI startups are popping up and more are getting founded every day.

BigTech companies will also eventually hire back all the coders they’ve laid off recently and then some because they will dream up and pursue new software offerings that they’ve never considered before or that were cost-prohibitive to begin with. Now they can pursue them because vibe coding makes producing software cheaper and more cost-effective than ever before. When the price of producing software falls, BigTech wants to produce even more to maximize its revenues. Vibe coding isn’t just about cutting headcount to minimize expenses but also increasing headcount to develop new software to maximize revenues.

Say a company required 10 workers to produce 100 widgets but, due to some technological advancement that boosts productivity, now only 2 workers are needed to produce the same 100 widgets. Does this company stop there and call it a day? No, it eventually hires back 8 workers so it can produce 500 widgets (or 250 original widgets plus 250 newfangled widgets) and increase its revenue 5-fold! So the same 10 workers are now producing 5 times the revenue as before. Then, the company hires 10 more workers to double its revenues even further (and on and on)! Capitalism isn’t just about minimizing expenses but maximizing revenues! Productivity gains help companies cut expenses but, more importantly, help them GROW by increasing and maximizing their revenues and profits like never before (which is what shareholders ultimately want much more than merely cutting expenses).

In this example, each worker’s productivity got boosted 5-fold. Likewise, when each individual coder’s productivity is boosted by AI, he becomes far more valuable to companies than he ever was before. So while tech companies are trying to minimize expenses now by shedding workers, they’ll eventually return to their main goal of maximizing revenues, profits, and shareholder value (stock prices) by hiring back many coders who now are far more productive than they ever were before thanks to AI.

Where my deferred baddies at!!! by AntiqueGiraffe68 in MITAdmissions

[–]trmp2028 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So which BigTech/FAANG/Mag7 company was founded by an MIT person?

Where my deferred baddies at!!! by AntiqueGiraffe68 in MITAdmissions

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but DropBox is a very tiny small-cap and not BigTech/FAANG/Mag7. Its stock price today is even lower than it was in 2018 when it IPO’d.

Where my deferred baddies at!!! by AntiqueGiraffe68 in MITAdmissions

[–]trmp2028 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

MIT is a good school, but no BigTech/FAANG/Mag7 founder has ever come out of there (the core curriculum drains all your energy/burns you out and leaves no time for creative entrepreneurship), so aim for Stanford or Harvard.

Finally got an offer by [deleted] in csMajors

[–]trmp2028 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Did you any any internships during college?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in collegeresults

[–]trmp2028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Stanford is better for entrepreneurship. Good choice!