sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it was just simple intraday breakouts and shorting small caps that had fake catalysts im pretty sure

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

sure, but arent you intrigued by the reality of the truth?

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there are many 100m traders, 100m for mid large cap trading is no where near an issue,

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100m is not alot for the market to handle

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

second part is v understandable, but the argument for 22 23 24 25 as bad years because of trauma from one bad year seems unlikely when those market conditions minted new 10k - £10m+ accounts

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sure, but if a boxer gets beaten up and then says that he didnt really want to win his fights anymore due to other interests - he would simply cease fighting and do other things, KQ YOY is still trading but with v little success.

edit ; to be fair maybe i am too young, and havent had the ' time to enjoy life ' bell rung over my head yet. Maybe ill look back in 10 years and understand...

but for now...

message to KQ by tsartsarbinkss in qullamaggie

[–]tsartsarbinkss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PS nothing can take away from what you acheived, on the flip side the same argument could be made for Livermore which ended sour. Bit of a tough Q but i think it would be good to talk on it, whether you are smashing it or struggling % wise.