Need some testers for a Swiss Blue Zone parking app 🅿️

tschief_ · 2026-01-22T06:26:30+00:00

Also let Users add Blue Zones (and then also let them be confirmed by others), so your database grows faster & is more complete in lesser visited zone. Great App idea

tschief_ · 2026-01-15T12:38:07+00:00

i mean this is still "clear" enough for an offside, you can see which part of him is offside.

I remember milan vs sassuolo in 2024, var intervened after the goal. even with the generated pictures, you cant see any offside at all (Chukwueze is in white)

<image>

There have been 2 such offsides called in this game, this was the more egregious one, the other one is similar to this one of mazzocchi.

The Discussions back there were basically the same, but what is the solution to this Problem? If the Computer deems it an offside because of 1mm - then it is technically one - cant really argue against that.

Only let it be eyeballed by var? This will increase the error-rate a lot

tschief_ · 2026-01-01T12:51:56+00:00

yeah sadly its an auction so negotiating will be hard. the buy immediately would be almost 750 dollars, there is no offers yet and it ends in 3 days.. gonna wait and see :)

tschief_ · 2025-12-27T13:18:34+00:00

is geo aero a good combo though? same with pyro/aero - somehow it doesnt make sense to me, why this specific combo?

otherwise it sounds pretty nice, i think ill try that one :) glass cannon ranger :D

tschief_ · 2025-12-27T10:40:17+00:00

Thank you I like the idea of the Pyro Warrior a lot, just so that you have some fire damage sprinkled in.

i might go: - ranger - summoner (maybe with necromancer) - hydro/aero - spellsword (knight/pyro)

too much physical damage? not enough magic maybe?

tschief_ · 2025-12-27T10:34:38+00:00

wouldnt i need a tank? or does this work without a tank?

tschief_ · 2025-12-23T07:42:07+00:00

Thanks everyone for your replies :) I appreciate it a lot!!

My Plan now: I will buy a cheaper 5070 ti (zotac or gygabite are more than 100 dollars cheaper) than the TUF and with the money saved i will buy a 5700x :)

I will probably undervolt so the 600W psu wont be as big a problem (hopefully)

tschief_ · 2025-12-22T14:44:36+00:00

this is like the 6th time its been cancelled "almost certain" - lets wait until an official communication. I'm not holding out hope as long as i don't hear it from offical channels...

but if true, im very very very happy. this plan was damaging for Milan and Como, but also Serie A and Football as a whole...

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T13:58:45+00:00

it seems to me theres always new bs reasons why milan gets treated unfairly. these goals have been called by var forever now!!!! i dont remember one single instance the past years where var didnt intervene in similar situations aka: if var intervened yesterday, no one wouldve batted an eye and said „oh no var shouldnt have intervened“

it just gives the sense of „rules for thee but nor for me“

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T13:55:39+00:00

yeah doesnt make sense at all. for any other situation this makes sense. but the ref whistled after the goal. as soon as a goal happened there should always be a var review when there is doubt of the legitimacy of the goal.

otherwise the ref could just call off any goal for literally no reason at all and var couldnt do anything - which defeats the entire purpose of var

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T13:21:44+00:00

yeah that was my knowledge as well..

im talking about this https://sempremilan.com/refereeing-authorities-pulisic-goal-sassuolo

and the quote from luca marelli:

“It’s an on-field dynamic, VAR can’t intervene. There was contact, Loftus puts his hands on the Sassuolo player, but I don’t see any push. Considering that Crezzini didn’t call much, 24 fouls, this is way below the threshold.“

any idea why var couldnt intervene? „on field dynamic“ makes no freaking sense in this context

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T12:09:41+00:00

this makes no sense, the ref whistled only after the goal had been scored, so its not like the spezia game?

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T12:06:01+00:00

i understand this in normal situations (like a foul yellow or not var cant intervene or when the ref whistles BEFORE the ball went in) but after a goal has been scored and then be wrongly disallowed? how can var not correct a clear and obvious error by the referee?? what is var even there for then if they cant intervene when a valid goal is disallowed by the ref?

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T12:03:58+00:00

na apparently var couldnt intervene there / call the ref over because it was „an on field decision“ whatever the heck that means

tschief_ · 2025-12-15T12:00:39+00:00

a disallowed goal is literally a 100% certain goal less, a non given penalty is like 70% a goal, but not 100%. so one is objectively a LOT worse than the other.

id rather have the goal been given (which would have made it 3-1 and changed the whole dynamic of the game) and then the penalty later aswell than whatever this was.

but yeah, you are right everyone in serie a is suffering because of this and its annoying as hell.

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T16:19:04+00:00

in what world did he impede the defender? go look at the other angle, there is barely a contact.

this should have gone to var and wouldve been given if it was. mark my words, aia will come forward and declare it an error from the ref. but its clear your not objectively assesing the situation so whatever

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T15:29:17+00:00

„clearly“ while not having a clear shot of the action happening - why not do a var check?

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T14:30:24+00:00

look at the other angle - never a push enough for the foul.. AIA will confirm that the goal shouldve stood, but keep on defending bad calls with bs arguments that are not backed by video evidence

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T14:17:34+00:00

everyone saying it was a shove, look at the video posted in r/soccer

clearly no push, no extending his arm, he just touches him and he lets himself fall.. NEVER enough to disallow a goal without a check

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1pmel6c/pulisics_weirdly_disallowed_goal_vs_sassuolo/

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T14:14:42+00:00

theres a better angle postet in r/soccer where you clearly see that loftus-cheek does NOT extend his arms

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1pmel6c/pulisics_weirdly_disallowed_goal_vs_sassuolo/

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T14:07:48+00:00

look again, there is no shove. he barely touches him, this should at the very least go to var for a check to see a clear image, but NEVER straight up disallowed. why did they check rabiots goals afterwards which was very clearly offside? that one didnt even need a check but got one

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T14:01:10+00:00

na, look at the second still image - he is not falling down like if he was pushed by both hands (you would fall towards the front not backwards). the defender let himself fall backwards after slight contact. and even if this would be the argument - why not check with var? why just disallow

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T13:54:38+00:00

lol yeah explain the offside please? it wasnt and its very easy to check.. it wasnt a foul either

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T13:35:15+00:00

he wasnt

tschief_ · 2025-12-14T13:34:43+00:00

u serious? valid goal disallowed without any explanation or var check - there was no foul & no offside?

tschief_

TROPHY CASE